"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so
on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.

Then it wasn't part of the design. QED.

Looka here ilk,
http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...+East+Hostages

Does that sort of kind of Ring a Bell?

It's like this, sort of kind of, They (''They'') save the Bogeyman for
whatever other U.S.(Keep in mind, SCARHEAD MOFO USURPER! is NOT! the
President of U.S.A. U.S.A.does NOT! have a President!) prezes.Do you
follow me? Do you understand what I am getting at?
cuhulin

On 05/08/2011 03:54 PM, RHF wrote:
On May 8, 6:31 am, wrote:
On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:



- - The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy"
- - Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...29619837dd65e7

- If we can use Navy SEALs to execute one guy for war crimes, why not
another?

Dave, Dave, Dave : Once Again You Prove That You
Are NO Libertarian of any Stripe -but- an Intolerant
Elitist* With Liberal-Fascist Tendencies to Send-Out
Death Squads To Kill Americans and America's Leaders

Libertarians don't believe in pre-emptive war. We are way less likely to
be swept up in some media frenzied orgasm of patriotism and revenge. We
know that nothing changes until I the individual change.

CIA and Born in Kenya! SCARHEAD!
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=307403
cuhulin

"Scout" wrote in message




"joeturn" wrote in message

..
..
On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message


.
...





On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring
their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all
followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of
all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ...
security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -

Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -

Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -

Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_ha
lliburton...

Part Four -

Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe
the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors,
and so
on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.

Then it wasn't part of the design. QED.

If anything was put in anywhere for Bush..

It was during the period when cousin Marvin Bush was director of
security for the WTC - just months before its collapse.

On May 8, 3:13*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

....

On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so
on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.

Then it wasn't part of the design. QED.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It was part of somebodys design since they were installed and Lofferty
was asked where to put them!

I takes my sweaty nasty stinking socks off, I drapes them on doggy's
head.
Pheeeeeeeeuuuu,,, doggy says.WMD!
cuhulin

Bush invaded and holocausted a nation that never did anything to us
and nothing has been done to him!!!

"Uno Hu" wrote in message
...


"Scout" wrote in message




"joeturn" wrote in message

..
.
On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message


.
..





On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring
their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all
followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of
all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ...
security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -

Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -

Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -

Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_ha
lliburton...

Part Four -

Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe
the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors,
and so
on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.

Then it wasn't part of the design. QED.

If anything was put in anywhere for Bush..

It was during the period when cousin Marvin Bush was director of
security for the WTC - just months before its collapse.

Right, and as director he could naturally violate the terms of the
contractual security without anyone noticing, or even employees coming
forward later saying "Hey my boss ordered me to look the other way while all
these guys with pallets of explosives came into the building".

Sorry, but that's not going to hold water.

On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote:
They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...ic_halliburton...

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

Excellent presentation of ...

.... bull****.

Not one contradictory fact has been presented.

Not one supporting fact has been presented. In fact, all the science,
evidence, videos, witnesses, etc., contradict your claims. This is not
even remotely open to dispute.

The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.