Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 2:14*pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! The explosives were built into all the towers during their construction! Listen to the architect's interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
joeturn wrote:
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! The explosives were built into all the towers during their construction! Listen to the architect's interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded Well, then it's gotta be true....even though that flaky retard had nothing to do with it. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote:
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene. Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene. the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! The explosives were built into all the towers during their construction! Listen to the architect's interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too! Krypsis |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/7/2011 8:17 AM, Krypsis wrote:
... Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene. Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene. ... For all intents and purposes: kerosene = No. 1 Diesel = Jet Fuel There are minor differences, as an example: http://www.combinedoil.com/pdf/MAP_N...20Kerosene.pdf My grandfather used to use No. 1 Diesel in kerosene lamps and kerosene heaters for barns and smudge pots to keep plants in the fields from freezing ... in the home he only used kerosene, said it was because it was "deodorized No. 1 Diesel." Now-a-days? Who knows ... Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Krypsis wrote:
On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene. Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene. the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! The explosives were built into all the towers during their construction! Listen to the architect's interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too! It was supposed to be funny....and by golly, it was! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 11:17*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah *wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k *idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene. Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene. the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! The explosives were built into all the towers during their construction! Listen to the architect's interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too! Krypsis- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Please explain how my comments makes you think of tripping.How often do you do this? Is it a problem or have you not sold your soul yet to support your habbit? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say? http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg I don't think so. Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say? http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg I don't think so. Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out on them! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say? http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg I don't think so. Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1973 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: * US * wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k idiotically wrote: The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing a collapse When demolished ... That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes into them at 500 Kts, you retard. They get demolished. The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins. and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left with was a "normal" high-rise fire. Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints! Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say? http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg I don't think so. Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their construction prior to 1968 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave |