On Jun 9, 10:43*pm, "max headroom" wrote:
talk.politics.GUNS

"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...
On Jun 9, 5:48 am, joeturn wrote:





On Jun 1, 9:21 wrote:

On Jun 1, 6:23 am, joeturn wrote:

On May 29, 8:47 wrote:

On May 29, 3:42 pm, joeturn wrote:

On May 27, 8:13 wrote:

On May 27, 12:52 am, joeturn wrote:

On May 26, 11:51 wrote:

On May 26, 5:04 pm, joeturn wrote:

On May 26, 6:54 pm, RD Sandman wrote:

joeturn wrote
:

On May 26, 2:00 pm, RD Sandman wrote:
joeturn wrote
innews:19a9de4c-4b15-4cd9-9890-604d
:

Actually I'm complaining just like you,Just think I could have
made that extra 100 pionts making it say 245 if I had taken the
test,while not being over-medicatedI;-)

And it would be even more bull**** than your claim of 145.

You could not excess my link or are you ashamed to post your score?
I think my IQ is higher than your bowling score! Even if it was a
spelling test you could not get any higher than 100 which is
average for the majority.I;-)

Whatever.....don't you understand that on the internet everyone is 6'
5", weighs 245lbs and has an IQ over 145?

Soo post your link so we can tell how tall you are!

5' 9" or would you prefer 6' 5"?

--
Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman)

If you woke up this morning....
Don't complain.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No that would be allowing your word to be a reliable source.Surely you
can out score me Im a kook and mentally chalenged with an altered
state of mind. Let your mommy read it for you,you can just take a wild
guess if she gets stumped on a hard question.Its multiple choice and
you should be able to guess your way into the limelight!.

Stop sniffing glue, kooktard.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You have not solved this crime after I told you what happened!

WrognTurnJoe, YOU don't tell peopel what happened. YOU tell people
what the kooky voices in your head tell you to say!

Hint: Your claims are physically impossible; the official findings
resolve every question, the FACT that you cannot NAME ONE THING in the
NIST report that is incorrect shows you are an idiot.

So you name one thing that was not correct in the NIST report

HEY WrongTurnJoe, you MORON: NOTHING is incorrect in the NIST report.
Your continuing inability to NAME ONE THING proves that.

and
claim your not the IDIOT.Failure to do soo after you have been shown
several inconsistances in the NIST report

You HAVE NOT NAMED ONE THING that is inconsistent in the NIST report.
Not a one.

puts your intelect in
jeopardy.Fact is is that its by far harder to find just one thing that
is not a lie in the NIST report!

Then NAME ONE, moron. YOU CAN'T AND YOU WON'T!!

BWAHAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!

You have 30 seconds to prove your not the idiot, GO!

Done and done. Your constant illiteracy and lack of reasoning skills
and your ignorance of basic physics exposes you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So you name one thing that was correct in the NIST report and
claim your not the IDIOT.

Poor poor WrongTurnJoe!! STILL failing to understand the nature of his
task!!

Joey, YOU are the one who is supposed to NAME ONE THING in the NIST
report that you "think" is wrong. So far, across these many months and
years, you have been utterly INCAPABLE of doing so. The fact is,
EVERYTHING in the NIST report is verified TRUTH and CORRECT, and this
is why you continue to RUN AWAY from your challenge! Too funny! But we
knew you would.

Failure to do soo after you have been shown
several inconsistances in the NIST report puts your intelect in
jeopardy.

OH THE ****IN' IRONY!! "Intelect?" BWAHAAHAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAA!!
"Inconsistances?" BWAWWWAHAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHHAAA!!! "Soo?"
BWAHAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!

Joey, I think you've been missing your ride on the short bus!

Hint: You have not yet shown ANY inconsistency at all. None. FAIL.

Now let's all watch WrongTurnJoe RUN AWAY AGAIN!!

MightyIarnrodcorrectly predicts WrongTurnJoe will once again FAIL to
NAME ONe THING!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There is a never ending list of things NIST got wrong in their
Government paid for 911 commission report!

Well then why can't you NAME ONE, WrongTurnJoe?

BWAAAHAAAAHAAAHHAHAAAA!!!

You can't and you won't!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I've already named one! They claimed controlled demolition was not
what brought down the Twin Towers.That was an obvious lie.

Mary has some pretty titties huh?

On Jun 9, 8:58*am, Klaus Schadenfreude
wrote:
joeturn wrote in talk.politics.guns :
There is a never ending list of things NIST got wrong in their
Government paid for 911 commission report! Here is just one!

They said after listening to tapes where the audible level was
dubed.That the elevation of noise was not loud enough for an explotion
large enough to bring down the twin towers!

I can tell you're an expert, just by the way you spell "explosion."

That tells me you are extremely proficient in the science of physics
and chemistry. You may have even met someone who studied the subject,
or watched "Mythbusters" once to see them try to blow up a Bic lighter
by leaving it on the dashboard of a car.

Pray tell, what other Secrets can you reveal to us?

I can tell all ,that your expertise is limited to spelling.

What a waist of a brain,when you have been programed to avoid reality
based on spelling.

Just think if you could get past this hangup,you could move onto
things of importance.

It is a pitty to see how many people can spell but not think.

**** #2 has already been given the job of being my spell checker,if
she falls ill and cannot service me anymore I will take your resume
under consideration.Although be advised if you want to join the league
of spell checkers give specifics of your castration,Eunuchs need only
apply!

joeturn wrote in talk.politics.guns :

On Jun 9, 8:58*am, Klaus Schadenfreude
wrote:
joeturn wrote in talk.politics.guns :
There is a never ending list of things NIST got wrong in their
Government paid for 911 commission report! Here is just one!

They said after listening to tapes where the audible level was
dubed.That the elevation of noise was not loud enough for an explotion
large enough to bring down the twin towers!

I can tell you're an expert, just by the way you spell "explosion."

That tells me you are extremely proficient in the science of physics
and chemistry. You may have even met someone who studied the subject,
or watched "Mythbusters" once to see them try to blow up a Bic lighter
by leaving it on the dashboard of a car.

Pray tell, what other Secrets can you reveal to us?

I can tell all ,that your expertise is limited to spelling.

It's not MY expertise we're talking about. It's yours. Clearly, you
are endowed with mental powers far beyond those of mortal men.

Just think if you could get past this hangup,you could move onto
things of importance.

Like "explotions?"

It is a pitty to see how many people can spell but not think.

Indeed. It's a "pitty."

[chuckle]

_____________
__________________
Hitler had escaped to a secret Nazi base at the South Pole
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...megafile18.htm
The earth is flat:
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djubl...rthsociety.htm
Paul is dead:
http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/
The moon landings were faked:
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
Everyone knows 9/11 was faked:
http://www.911hoax.com/
The "face" on Mars is artificial:
http://metaresearch.org/solar%20syst...iles/proof.asp
....and...
...most importantly.....
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

On 6/11/2011 1:54 AM, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 9, 8:58 am, Klaus
wrote:
wrote in talk.politics.guns :
There is a never ending list of things NIST got wrong in their
Government paid for 911 commission report! Here is just one!

They said after listening to tapes where the audible level was
dubed.That the elevation of noise was not loud enough for an explotion
large enough to bring down the twin towers!

I can tell you're an expert, just by the way you spell "explosion."

That tells me you are extremely proficient in the science of physics
and chemistry. You may have even met someone who studied the subject,
or watched "Mythbusters" once to see them try to blow up a Bic lighter
by leaving it on the dashboard of a car.

Pray tell, what other Secrets can you reveal to us?

I can tell all ,that your expertise is limited to spelling.

What a waist of a brain,when you have been programed to avoid reality
based on spelling.

Just think if you could get past this hangup,you could move onto
things of importance.

It is a pitty to see how many people can spell but not think.

**** #2 has already been given the job of being my spell checker,if
she falls ill and cannot service me anymore I will take your resume
under consideration.Although be advised if you want to join the league
of spell checkers give specifics of your castration,Eunuchs need only
apply!

Look don't sweat their strawmen arguments based around spelling which go
like this, "If your spelling is in error, your logic is in error."

Anyone of real worth will gauge your writing on the logic, not on the
spelling ... just get the logic right ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:48:06 -0700, John Smith
wrote:


Look don't sweat their strawmen arguments based around spelling which go
like this, "If your spelling is in error, your logic is in error."

Anyone of real worth will gauge your writing on the logic, not on the
spelling ... just get the logic right ...

Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On 6/11/2011 7:43 AM, Howard Brazee wrote:

...
Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".


I was not commenting on the logic of the post ... which may, or may not,
be of any real value ... I am just tired of punctuation, grammar,
spelling, etc. being cited as "proof" of defective logic ...

That's all ... the strawmen attacks, no matter how they are crafted, or
about what elements they are crafted, are getting rather boring ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:51:48 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".


I was not commenting on the logic of the post ... which may, or may not,
be of any real value ... I am just tired of punctuation, grammar,
spelling, etc. being cited as "proof" of defective logic ...

That's all ... the strawmen attacks, no matter how they are crafted, or
about what elements they are crafted, are getting rather boring ...

And I agreed with you - but made an additional note.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On 6/11/2011 8:14 AM, Howard Brazee wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:51:48 -0700, John
wrote:

Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".


I was not commenting on the logic of the post ... which may, or may not,
be of any real value ... I am just tired of punctuation, grammar,
spelling, etc. being cited as "proof" of defective logic ...

That's all ... the strawmen attacks, no matter how they are crafted, or
about what elements they are crafted, are getting rather boring ...

And I agreed with you - but made an additional note.


What does a little clarification hurt?

Why so sensitive?

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

On 6/11/2011 7:43 AM, Howard Brazee wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:48:06 -0700, John
wrote:


Look don't sweat their strawmen arguments based around spelling which go
like this, "If your spelling is in error, your logic is in error."

Anyone of real worth will gauge your writing on the logic, not on the
spelling ... just get the logic right ...

Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".


OK. Let me go a bit further; I would support a properly formatted and
spelled document, but I agree with you, I think, the importance/validity
of what is contained in the post is what is of real value, or not ...

Never intended to offend you on all this, sorry if you interpreted it
that way ...

--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry

Howard Brazee wrote in talk.politics.guns :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:48:06 -0700, John Smith
wrote:


Look don't sweat their strawmen arguments based around spelling which go
like this, "If your spelling is in error, your logic is in error."

Anyone of real worth will gauge your writing on the logic, not on the
spelling ... just get the logic right ...

Correct.

But it isn't invalid to assume "If you don't think your post is worthy
of review and editing - you probably are correct".

It's all in the details. If the stupid **** can't even spell simple
words, what OTHER details is he screwing up?