| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
June 2nd 11, 05:01 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest? |
|
#2
June 2nd 11, 05:13 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote:
On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ? |
|
#3
June 2nd 11, 05:37 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...eature=related |
|
#4
June 2nd 11, 06:51 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...ature=related- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Also notice the sound of the plane in flight keeps playing after it crashes as if it has not been effected by the sudden stop. |
|
#5
June 2nd 11, 07:56 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...ature=related- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9Drb...layer_embedded |
|
#6
June 2nd 11, 06:46 PM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 2, 1:56*am, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...e=related-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9Drb...ayer_embedded- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hows my hotsy ****sy Lamerod this fine afternoon? |
|
#7
June 3rd 11, 06:35 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 2, 12:51*am, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...e=related-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Also notice the sound of the plane in flight keeps playing after it crashes as if it has not been effected by the sudden stop.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The sound of the plane keeps playing ? What are talking about ??? Why do you propagate disinformation ??? |
|
#8
June 3rd 11, 06:39 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 2, 10:35*pm, wrote:
On Jun 2, 12:51*am, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc... * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...ted-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - Also notice the sound of the plane in flight keeps playing after it crashes as if it has not been effected by the sudden stop.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The sound of the plane keeps playing ? What are talking about ??? Why do you propagate disinformation ??? Because he is a liar. That's what liars do. |
|
#9
June 3rd 11, 06:41 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On Jun 3, 12:39*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 2, 10:35*pm, wrote: On Jun 2, 12:51*am, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:37*pm, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:13*pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32*pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: *... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) *On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). *Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. *This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated.." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. * Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - Also notice the sound of the plane in flight keeps playing after it crashes as if it has not been effected by the sudden stop.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The sound of the plane keeps playing ? What are talking about ??? Why do you propagate disinformation ??? Because he is a liar. That's what liars do.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is very poor alibi . |
|
#10
June 3rd 11, 06:42 AM
posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
|
|||
|
|||
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
wrote in message ... On Jun 3, 12:39 am, Iarnrod wrote: On Jun 2, 10:35 pm, wrote: On Jun 2, 12:51 am, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:37 pm, joeturn wrote: On Jun 1, 11:13 pm, wrote: On Jun 1, 11:01 pm, joeturn wrote: On May 6, 3:32 pm, Jah Wobble wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:22 AM, John Smith wrote: ... Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! ... Well, I am with you, I frequently laugh at anything FEMA/NIST says, also ... However, I do believe they are right on, at least, this single point: "It is highly unlikely that jet fuel was present to generate such explosions especially on lower floors, and long after the planes hit the buildings. Dr. Shyam Sunder, Lead Investigator for NIST stated: "The jet fuel probably burned out in less than 10 minutes.” (Field, 2005) On the other hand, pre-positioned explosives provide a plausible and simple explanation for the observations, satisfying Occam’s razor (Jones, 2005). Thus, it cannot be said that “no evidence” can be found for the use of explosives. This serious matter needs to be treated as a plausible scientific hypothesis and thoroughly investigated." Fire up google and see how many disagree with Dr. Shyam Sunder! Like you, he is a retard if you think we tossed the trade center, the pentagon, and the plane in PA, faked the moon landing, and etc.. Yer a retard, get over it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you believe in fairy tales? Man has never survived a trip to the moon.You saw the lunar modual on TV(just like the cartooned planes hitting the buildings),now explain how they docked the lunar modual and got into the splash down modual! Its television not reality! We tossed the Titanic,the Lusiatania,the Murrah Building,Pearl Harbor,ect why not the rest?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What cartooned planes are you referring to ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The planes on TV that noone at the scene saw .The ones they spliced(overlayed) onto the live feeds on 911 at the precise momets to hoodwink the audience into believing they were real! A few live feeds did not have the overlay and published the view without planes! They even hologramed the south tower plane hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXr_s...Hidequotedtext - - Show quoted text - Also notice the sound of the plane in flight keeps playing after it crashes as if it has not been effected by the sudden stop.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The sound of the plane keeps playing ? What are talking about ??? Why do you propagate disinformation ??? Because he is a liar. That's what liars do.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is very poor alibi . Yea, but he's a very poor liar too. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A CASE OF WHODUNIT! | Shortwave | |||
| A CASE OF WHODUNIT! | Shortwave | |||
| A CASE OF WHODUNIT! | Shortwave | |||
| K!MAN Has a Case ... | Antenna | |||
| PRO-82 case? | Scanner | |||
Linear Mode
