Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:03:20 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:
That's not the business Apple is in; they sell a lifestyle of form [over] substance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Besides, Apple was extant in the market before PC's (the original Apple computer was something like $3000, a clone was about $2300, IIRC). Apple maintained a following and indeed an increasing market base even after PC's got so cheap that most anyone could afford one. If someone likes a product enough to pay what seems to be an exhorbitant price for it, even in the face of a much cheaper alternative, then that is what they call "market forces" in operation. The consumer, in this case, has actually set the price by buying the product. If nobody were buying it, it would either become cheaper or taken off the market. They subsidised and strongarmed their way into schools; a whole generation equated Apple with computing. It's definitely a fashion thing. I was the IT guy at a TV network west coast headquarters. All the "creative" types insisted on iMacs; they refused to work on windows machines (this is for typing-not editing). Hollywood creative types are insufferable boors. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have at least half a dozen old Apple and Mac computers, and a bunch of
old Windows computers.Some of them are Portable Computers, forerunners of laptop computers, one of them has a big shoulder strap attached to it.Five of my old Dinasaurs (computers) were given to me for free.The rest of them, I bought dirt cheap at Goodwill.My newest computer, a Velocity Micro ProMagix desktop computer XP Home Edition operating system, I bought it new from Velocity Micro in Richmond,Virginia in November of 2004.I have seven WebTV set top boxes.For most of what I do, WebTV works just fine for me. I am an Idiot. cuhulin |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Jobs was a Great inovator, that is for Sure.
cuhulin |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When my eight years older brother was an MP at Fort Gordon,Georgia back
in the 1950s, a guy was driving a Jeep.That guy had forgot to first check the oil level.He burnt the Jeep engine up.My brother and another guy, they went out there with some old used motor oil.They drained the new oil from the Jeep, then they refilled the Jeep engine with the old used motor oil.When they got back to Motor Pool, the boss said, I can't understand why that engine burned up. What kind of motor oil are you using Earl? ///Motor oyl is motor oyl!/// cuhulin |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:03:20 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote: That's not the business Apple is in; they sell a lifestyle of form [over] substance ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Besides, Apple was extant in the market before PC's (the original Apple computer was something like $3000, a clone was about $2300, IIRC). Apple maintained a following and indeed an increasing market base even after PC's got so cheap that most anyone could afford one. If someone likes a product enough to pay what seems to be an exhorbitant price for it, even in the face of a much cheaper alternative, then that is what they call "market forces" in operation. The consumer, in this case, has actually set the price by buying the product. If nobody were buying it, it would either become cheaper or taken off the market. They subsidised and strongarmed their way into schools; a whole generation equated Apple with computing. It's definitely a fashion thing. I was the IT guy at a TV network west coast headquarters. All the "creative" types insisted on iMacs; they refused to work on windows machines (this is for typing-not editing). Hollywood creative types are insufferable boors. Of course... ...someone insisting on a product must be a "fashion thing". How exactly did Apple "strongarm" their way into schools. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Alan Baker wrote: In article , dave wrote: On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:03:20 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote: That's not the business Apple is in; they sell a lifestyle of form [over] substance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- Besides, Apple was extant in the market before PC's (the original Apple computer was something like $3000, a clone was about $2300, IIRC). Apple maintained a following and indeed an increasing market base even after PC's got so cheap that most anyone could afford one. If someone likes a product enough to pay what seems to be an exhorbitant price for it, even in the face of a much cheaper alternative, then that is what they call "market forces" in operation. The consumer, in this case, has actually set the price by buying the product. If nobody were buying it, it would either become cheaper or taken off the market. They subsidised and strongarmed their way into schools; a whole generation equated Apple with computing. It's definitely a fashion thing. I was the IT guy at a TV network west coast headquarters. All the "creative" types insisted on iMacs; they refused to work on windows machines (this is for typing-not editing). Hollywood creative types are insufferable boors. Of course... ...someone insisting on a product must be a "fashion thing". How exactly did Apple "strongarm" their way into schools. Perhaps this genius can also explain why more and more college students in science and engineering are switching to Macs? Of their own free will, that is. And not to use Windoze on them, either. What is Apple at now - 11%, third largest, up from less than 5% four years ago? |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/8/2011 6:56 PM, RHF wrote:
On Oct 8, 5:42 pm, wrote: On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:33:33 -0700, John Smith wrote: On 10/5/2011 8:10 PM, J R wrote: I just now heard on TV news he has died. cuhulin I guess you just can't keep charging people too much for hardware and OS forever ... someone elses' turn now ... Regards, JS - That's not the business Apple is in; - they sell a lifestyle of form of substance. Ah M4 Mania Dave -u-b- Smoking Da App El ! -aka-'substance'-abuse- * Mucho Medical-Marijuana Madness [M4] . . Reminds me of that old Cheech and Chong movie where they are smuggling dope into the USA by forming the compressed pot into the material the auto body is made out of ... maybe dave is indicating you break off parts of a MAC and smoke it? I don't know, I'll wait until others have tried it and see if it looks like something I would like to do, or not ... Regards, JS |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2011 11:49 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
In articlejoednXxxSuLvPQzTnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink .com, wrote: On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:03:20 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote: That's not the business Apple is in; they sell a lifestyle of form [over] substance ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Besides, Apple was extant in the market before PC's (the original Apple computer was something like $3000, a clone was about $2300, IIRC). Apple maintained a following and indeed an increasing market base even after PC's got so cheap that most anyone could afford one. If someone likes a product enough to pay what seems to be an exhorbitant price for it, even in the face of a much cheaper alternative, then that is what they call "market forces" in operation. The consumer, in this case, has actually set the price by buying the product. If nobody were buying it, it would either become cheaper or taken off the market. They subsidised and strongarmed their way into schools; a whole generation equated Apple with computing. It's definitely a fashion thing. I was the IT guy at a TV network west coast headquarters. All the "creative" types insisted on iMacs; they refused to work on windows machines (this is for typing-not editing). Hollywood creative types are insufferable boors. Of course... ...someone insisting on a product must be a "fashion thing". How exactly did Apple "strongarm" their way into schools. They virtually gave them the hardware, then sold them the software for exorbitant prices ... signed them into exploitative contracts, etc. Contracts which stipulated only apple people maintained the college hardware ... etc., etc. Games within games, really. Back in the late 80's and early 90's I taught at a jr. college, I seen first hand how apples predatory sales techniques worked. Finally, at the college, a few of us wrote letters of complaint to the "higher ups" and rectified the problem ... there was also some business of "incentives" being passed about about by apple to those who controlled purchasing ... lunches, wining and dining, etc. However, digital equipment corporation also participated in such practices ... (DEC) However, one thing I did notice, the "apple room" was always full of liberal arts students while the PC sections of the computer labs always contained the math, physics, science, etc. students ... just as a casual observation ... Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama creates 200 new jobs! | Shortwave | |||
Obama creates 200 new jobs! | Shortwave | |||
Disabilities and jobs in broadcasting | Broadcasting | |||
Obama creates 30,000 jobs with $787 Billion tax dollars | Shortwave | |||
American Trauma: Jobs and the Economy | Shortwave |