Am 15.12.2011 05:20, schrieb John Baker:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:03:25 -0800 (PST),

So what are Good Men to do in the face
of an Uncompromising Gangster Gov't
which operates on a Global Scale
with unlimited force?

Well, what can one do?

Scratch...

If I think about a situation, where government and certain helpers try
to defeat the rest of the world, that rest should take care of those,
that threaten them.

In a democracy the people decide and not a certain group, however defined.

The people threatened should make perfectly clear, they would be after
those, that commit crimes or that help other to commit crimes.

Any threatening of regular citizens is regarded as crime and will be
prosecuted. Theft, rape, torture and murder are also crimes - of course
- and nobody committing any will get away with this.

Possibly the current powers would win a fight or a war, but people have
long memories and will not forget and will take care of those, that
commited crimes.

The other question would be, if it is necessary to allow any subgroup of
a society to harass, threaten or even kill another subgroup. That sounds
like a question of power.

At first sight I would say, crimes commited by the government under
fraudulent laws are still crimes and nobody should consider taking part
in such lawless activities. The officials of all kinds must remember
their constitution and the oath they have given and never ever allow or
support atrocities against their own countrymen.

But if things go really bad, than it would be mandatory to calm down,
identify the enemy and take them out. This would be measure of last
resort of course, so peaceful habits should be preferred.

TH

Thomas Heger
Am 15.12.2011 05:20, schrieb John Baker:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:03:25 -0800 (PST), steadyeddy4u
So what are Good Men to do in the face
of an Uncompromising Gangster Gov't
which operates on a Global Scale
with unlimited force?

Well, what can one do?

Scratch...

If I think about a situation, where government and certain helpers try
to defeat the rest of the world, that rest should take care of those,
that threaten them.

In a democracy the people decide and not a certain group, however defined.

The people threatened should make perfectly clear, they would be after
those, that commit crimes or that help other to commit crimes.

Any threatening of regular citizens is regarded as crime and will be
prosecuted. Theft, rape, torture and murder are also crimes - of course
- and nobody committing any will get away with this.



My kinda world!

The LIBs streets are extended gutters overflowing with blood and
depravity, when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown.
The accumulated filth of all their crap will foam up about their waists
and all the victims, liberal freaks and politicians will look up and shout
"Save us!"... and I will whisper to them "NO."

http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/...3/botchmen.jpg






Do you really have any illusion that you elect your President,
let alone the Leader of a Free World anymore?
Why isn't the NEED for a Leader to Follow
considered anything-BUT a weakness
to overcome?


LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---
The world should be very concerned about OBAMA's Sequel.
This is it's AVATAR. Aren't you GLAD you settled for the Lesser Evil?



http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/79...linton-281.jpg
http://www.comicbookbuddy.com/wp-con...er_Joker11.jpg
http://wallpaperswide.com/thumbs/the_joker-t2.jpg
http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2010...s/chelsea_clin
ton/chelsea_clinton13130659--500x380.jpg



http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...an_nomenklatur
a.html
Secrets of the American Nomenklatura

With the rise of independent media, the secrets of the American
nomenklatura are coming into clearer focus, the shameless exploitation
of the good will and treasure of the people increasingly put on view for
all to see.


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/...ugged-and-ayn-
rand-predict-america-spinning-out-control/

How Did Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged'
Predict an America Spinning Out of Control?


Was the solution to “go Galt” and quit society? No, Rand again
answered. The solution was simultaneously much easier and much harder.
“So long as we have not yet reached the state of censorship of ideas,”
she once said, “one does not have to leave a society in the way the
characters did in Atlas Shrugged. . . . But you know what one does have
to do? One has to break relationships with the culture. . . . [D]iscard
all the ideas—the entire cultural philosophy which is dominant today.”