Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El lunes, 30 de abril de 2012 06:00:25 UTC+2, abd allah escribió:
After reflecting on all of the above, how could we look to the universe above us through a telescope or observe the cells in a microscope and then think all of this came about as a result of a "big bang" or some "accident"? After reflecting on all of the above, how could we look to the universe above us through a telescope or observe the cells in a microscope and then think all of this came about as a result of a "god"? So, what you say for the "big bang" you can say for "god" also. The big difference between "big bang" approach and "god" approach is that "big bang" people leave us free and "god" people tries to limit this. So I go for "big bang". Wim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's the GOD Particle, man, the GOD Particle. I done Proved GOD does exist. What more do you want?
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Art - prove it or go away | Antenna | |||
Markie writes again to prove he's right | CB | |||
prove your assertion | Policy | |||
prove your asertion | Policy |