| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
May 20th 13, 04:39 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ......That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR?$?$? ...
On May 16, 4:43*pm, CyberDroog wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:38:41 -0700 (PDT), Jack Pine wrote: On May 14, 6:22*pm, CyberDroog wrote: There more to it than "American craftsmanship" disappearing also. *The fact is that the crafts have merely changed. Yes, American labor today would be barely recognizable by, say, a steelworker transported from 1955. Talk to JFK - he's the one who gave America's steel industry to Germany. The exponential growth in the digital world has accelerated the metamorphosis to such a rate that a few million people haven't been able to keep up. *I think this fact and the rapid expansion of Oriental economies can be named as two factors in our 'jobless recovery.' Life is change. *That has always been true. Never been anything like the current rate of change or population growth. |
|
#2
May 20th 13, 10:56 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ...... That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR ?$?$? ...
"CyberDroog" wrote in message om... Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where did you get that pearl of wisdom? World population continues to grow exponentially. In 1930, there were just 2 billion, we hit 3 billion around 1960, 4 billion in 1975, 5 billion in 1983, and 6 billion in ~ 1999. We're already closing rapidly on 7 billion. Yes, the rate of growth as a percentage of the total may be slightly lower, but when you deal with numbers like this, it's almost a non-sequitur. |
|
#3
May 21st 13, 06:50 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ......That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR?$?$? ...
On Monday, May 20, 2013 3:56:16 PM UTC-5, Brenda Dyer wrote:
"CyberDroog" wrote in message om... Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where did you get that pearl of wisdom? World population continues to grow exponentially. In 1930, there were just 2 billion, we hit 3 billion around 1960, 4 billion in 1975, 5 billion in 1983, and 6 billion in ~ 1999. We're already closing rapidly on 7 billion. Yes, the rate of growth as a percentage of the total may be slightly lower, but when you deal with numbers like this, it's almost a non-sequitur. A Bridge, you say? Go to the middle of the Bridge and turn right. |
|
#4
May 21st 13, 11:25 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ...... That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR ?$?$? ...
"CyberDroog" wrote in message om... On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:56:16 +0900, "Brenda Dyer" wrote: "CyberDroog" wrote in message news:0m0lp8dc5775rqvf3cb3nhhi52l0luhogi@giganews. com... Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where did you get that pearl of wisdom? World population continues to grow exponentially. In 1930, there were just 2 billion, we hit 3 billion around 1960, 4 billion in 1975, 5 billion in 1983, and 6 billion in ~ 1999. We're already closing rapidly on 7 billion. Yes, the rate of growth as a percentage of the total may be slightly lower, but when you deal with numbers like this, it's almost a non-sequitur. You ask a question, answer it yourself and then claim it doesn't follow.... sigh -- Men live in a fantasy world. I know this because I am one, and I actually receive my mail there. - Scott Adams ok |
|
#5
May 23rd 13, 09:24 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ......That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR?$?$? ...
Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. *It has been declining ever since. Interesting. Source? |
|
#6
May 23rd 13, 09:27 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ......That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR?$?$? ...
On May 21, 5:21*pm, CyberDroog wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:56:16 +0900, "Brenda Dyer" wrote: "CyberDroog" *wrote in message news:0m0lp8dc5775rqvf3cb3nhhi52l0luhogi@giganews. com... Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. *It has been declining ever since. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where did you get that pearl of wisdom? World population continues to grow exponentially. In 1930, there were just 2 billion, we hit 3 billion around 1960, 4 billion in 1975, 5 billion in 1983, and 6 billion in ~ 1999. We're already closing rapidly on 7 billion. Yes, the rate of growth as a percentage of the total may be slightly lower, but when you deal with numbers like this, it's almost a non-sequitur. You ask a question, answer it yourself and then claim it doesn't follow.... sigh The the rate of increase (acceleration) may have declined but the rate continues to increase, I believe. I doubt the worldwide population growth rate have ever been higher. Guessing. Source? |
|
#7
May 23rd 13, 09:30 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ...... That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR ?$?$? ...
Jack Pine wrote:
Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. Interesting. Source? non human primates |
|
#8
May 23rd 13, 09:32 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ...... That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR ?$?$? ...
Jack Pine wrote:
On May 21, 5:21 pm, CyberDroog wrote: On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:56:16 +0900, "Brenda Dyer" wrote: "CyberDroog" wrote in message om... Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where did you get that pearl of wisdom? World population continues to grow exponentially. In 1930, there were just 2 billion, we hit 3 billion around 1960, 4 billion in 1975, 5 billion in 1983, and 6 billion in ~ 1999. We're already closing rapidly on 7 billion. Yes, the rate of growth as a percentage of the total may be slightly lower, but when you deal with numbers like this, it's almost a non-sequitur. You ask a question, answer it yourself and then claim it doesn't follow.... sigh The the rate of increase (acceleration) may have declined but the rate continues to increase, I believe. I doubt the worldwide population growth rate have ever been higher. Guessing. Source? the the |
|
#9
May 23rd 13, 09:35 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ......That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR?$?$? ...
On May 23, 3:30*pm, "%" wrote:
Jack Pine wrote: Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. Interesting. *Source? non human primates " The paper is titled "Lethal intergroup aggression leads to territorial expansion in wild chimpanzees." The research is funded by the Detroit Zoological Institute, the Little Rock Zoo, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the National Geographic Society, the National Science Foundation, the University of Michigan, the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, and Yale University. " Read more at: http://phys.org/news196342222.html#jCp |
|
#10
May 23rd 13, 09:45 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.support.depression,alt.suicide.methods,alt.suicide.holiday,alt.politics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there anyone here besides me who has reached the point ...... That they would rather be dead ...... Than spend the rest of their lives POOR ?$?$? ...
Jack Pine wrote:
On May 23, 3:30 pm, "%" wrote: Jack Pine wrote: Peak population growth occurred 50 years ago. It has been declining ever since. Interesting. Source? non human primates " The paper is titled "Lethal intergroup aggression leads to territorial expansion in wild chimpanzees." The research is funded by the Detroit Zoological Institute, the Little Rock Zoo, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the National Geographic Society, the National Science Foundation, the University of Michigan, the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, and Yale University. " Read more at: http://phys.org/news196342222.html#jCp which has nothing to do with population regrowth |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
