Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
None that I am aware of. However, in order to have privacy, police use
NEXTEL just like everyone else, and so are part of the problem too. It's no longer enough to have a two-way radio in a patrol car, now there is the computer and cellular phones. they can compare notes about suspects they have under surveillance or have to deal with repeatedly - it saves having to deal with a dispatcher. Some systems are digital, so only a few people can hear what's happening, but digital is expensive, so few departments have it yet. It is ironic that law enforcement and the government which must enforce increasingly intrusive laws, finds it needs privacy itself. It is not impossible to build a scanner that can hear, but it takes expertise .... "Radioman390" wrote in message ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | General | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1371 - November 21, 2003 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1371 - November 21, 2003 | General |