Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right Al;
If It's on the INTERNET . . . It MUST be true !! Nother bunch of nuts... same author http://www.public-action.com/ Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS by Carol A. Valentine Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum In article , Al Patrick writes: You don't have to take my word for anything I say it says. You don't have to wonder. Go to http://www.comeandhear.com/ and scroll to the bottom of the page. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
America Is Rapidly Becoming Talmudized
In 1991, the US Congress declared the Talmudic Noahide Laws to be the basis "upon which our great Nation was founded" (see America's New Government Church http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_1.html). Under Noahide Law regulations, idolaters (which includes Christians by definition) are put to death. In 1999, the Supreme Court agreed to consider an amicus brief based wholly on Talmudic law (see Sentence and Execution http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/capunish_1.html). In November 2002, the American Orthodox Jewish community held a kosher dinner in the Supreme Court building to celebrate the establishment of the National Institute for Judaic Law. (6) http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_5.html#n6 The dinner was attended by 200 people, including three Supreme Court Justices. The purpose of the Institute is to introduce Talmudic laws into the US legal system and law schools. It is thus the clear civic duty of every American to become intimately acquainted with the Talmud. Read articles at: America's New Government Church: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_1.html Death Penalty: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/capunish_1.html Kosher Dinner: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jp-11-09-2002 and http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jw-01-08-03 BDK wrote: Why don't you post the bad things in th bible with the same glee you post the bad stuff from the talmud, Al?? I can guess why, it's not part of the jew hatin' hobby, is it?? How often do you get emails calling you a scumbag, or worse?? I hate to think how high the number is. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
LO,
"The Talmud is a legal document," Maybe at one time it may have been, in some nation, country or state. But, in the USA the Talmud like the Bible is NOT a Legal Document [.] In any public library the Talmud/Bible can be found in the "Religion" Section and also listed under 'fiction' and history. ~ RHF .. .. = = = Larry Ozarow = = = wrote in message ... Al Patrick wrote: I typed in "sex" and was surprised at the number of times it came up. Each item you click on provides even more. Like a 12 year-old going to the library and searching through the books for the "good parts." The Talmud is a legal document, and sex is a fairly major part of human relationships that especially in former times had serious legal consequences. To balance the hate literature you might take a look at http://www.strangersbible.com/talmudAntiHate.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They really teach some odd things about sex. Example:
Here's a passage full of advice. It, like the others, gives us insight into the folkways of Talmudic society. Among the advice: A wife should not demand her conjugal rights, and a man should avoid having intercourse with one wife while thinking of another wife -- he may, however, think of a woman who is not his wife. GEMARA. ... And that ye seek not after your own heart. (7) [Deducing] from this Rabbi taught: One may not drink out of one goblet and think of another. (8) Rabina said: This is necessary only when both are his wives. And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me. (1) R. Levi said: This refers to children belonging to the following nine categories: children of fear, (2) of outrage, of a hated wife, one under a ban, (3) of a woman mistaken for another, (4) of strife, (5) of intoxication [during intercourse], of a mentally divorced wife, (6) of promiscuity, and of a brazen woman. (7) But that is not so: for did not R. Samuel b. Nahmani say in the name of R. Jonathan: One who is summoned to his marital duty by his wife will beget children such as were not to be found even in the generation of Moses? For it is said, Take you wise men, and understanding [and known among your tribes, and I will make them rulers over you]; (8) and it is written, So I took the chiefs of your tribes, wise men and known (9) but 'understanding' is not mentioned. (10) But it is also written, Issachar is a large-boned ass; (11) whilst elsewhere it is written, And of the children of Issachar, which were men that had understanding of the titles? (12) -- [It is virtuous] only when the wife ingratiates herself [with her husband]. (13) -- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Nedarim 20b http://www.come-and-hear.com/nedarim/nedarim_20.html#20b Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 58-59 ================= Larry Ozarow wrote: Like a 12 year-old going to the library and searching through the books for the "good parts." The Talmud is a legal document, and sex is a fairly major part of human relationships that especially in former times had serious legal consequences. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The references are cited. Look them up -- IN THE LIBRARY -- OR AT YOUR
PRIEST'S OFFICE. They didn't just come off the internet. It was only a research tool. :-) Animals Are People, Too Now let us consider another subject important to the Talmud Sages: Bestiality. It seems to have been quite a problem. The rabbinical rulings on bestiality are complex and the rabbis make many subtle distinctions. (18) http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_5.html#n18 The Sages weigh carefully whether the human is male or female, whether the man uses the vagina or the anus of the beast, whether the beast uses the vagina or the anus of the woman, and whether the human is a minor child. The Sages take note that of a man, only the anus is available for passive intercourse ("unnatural"). Footnote 18 is provided: For examples of the subtle distinctions in bestiality, see Tractate Sanhedrin 54b http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_54.html#54b, Tractate Sanhedrin 55a http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_55.html, Tractate Sanhedrin 55b http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_55.html#55b A woman who commits bestiality in the presence of two witnesses, who warn her ahead of time on the gravity of her crime -- might be tried for a capital offense. However, if either condition is not met (two witnesses, and a warning from each), she suffers no censure and retains her eligibility to marry a High Priest. We are not told what happens to the animal in this case. GEMARA. ... R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest. (4) Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being, (5) though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning, (6) is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest. (7) When R. Dimi came he related: It once happened at Haitalu that while a young woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from the rear, and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High Priest in the days of Rabbi? -- Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest. -- Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 59b http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_59.html#59b Soncino 1961 Edition, page 397 The translator, Rev. Dr. Israel W. Slotki, amplifies the text with footnotes. 4. Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either. 5. A beast. 6. If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning. 7. In the absence of witnesses and warning. -- Rev. Dr. Slotki ---------------------------------- Diverd4777 wrote: Right Al; If It's on the INTERNET . . . It MUST be true !! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
LO, "The Talmud is a legal document," Maybe at one time it may have been, in some nation, country or state. But, in the USA the Talmud like the Bible is NOT a Legal Document [.] Duh. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does it teach how NOT to post html to text only newsgroups?
|
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... America Is Rapidly Becoming Talmudized In 1991, the US Congress declared the Talmudic Noahide Laws to be the basis "upon which our great Nation was founded" (see America's New Government Church http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_1.html). Under Noahide Law regulations, idolaters (which includes Christians by definition) are put to death. [snip] That come-and-hear website sure exposes the unexposed. Such as: "Despite this Congressional declaration, many Americans are still not aware that their country was founded on Talmudic laws. (70) It is still widely believed that America was founded on the principles contained in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and Anglo-Saxon law generally. Some of the Founding Fathers even thought they had been influenced by the writings of John Locke, a Scot. Help clear up this misunderstanding. A copy of that 1991 resolution, Joint House Resolution 104 Public Law 102-14, and prior Congressional Schneerson birthday resolutions are available for easy download and study. (1)" That's news to me! The Magna Carta, Locke, Hobbes, The Holy Bible, Indian tribal traditions, the Freemasons, the Illumanati didn't influence the thinking of guys like George Mason and Tom Jefferson and Hamilton and Adams and all the other founding fathers. Nope! It came straight from the Talmud!! Who'd have figured? Clearly, I've been reading the wrong sources. I've never even seen a Talmud. I guess the best conspiracies are the most secret. Oh, the website clearly explains exactly why the ACLU is so anti-abortion and pro-death penalty. "On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the murder of an embryo." "Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin. (3) It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc.:' What is taught by the expression any man? (4) The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.(5)" That's the death penalty, and ACLUites are all for it, I'm sure. It also has a vaguely Decalogueish look to it. Thank goodness the ACLU/Talmud gang are fighting to keep the Stone Tablets on display in Alabama. Thanks, Al. Looks like I've filled my quota of "Special Knowledge" early this week. I might even sleep through George W. Gentry Sunday morning. Frank Dresser |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDK wrote in
: This is an easy question to answer. The media, the news, the purveyors of movies, drama, comedy, sci-fi, they all see to it that Christians are given a bad rap. Watch TV closely for a week, 10,000 Holocaust movies designed to elicit empathy for the plight of the Jews, (truly a sad time in history), and as many movies showing perverted priests, reverends, holy rollers, everything and anything to demean the Christian religion. Why was our current president not shown as a picture of Moses rather than Christ? Jews are NOT made fun of on TV, unless it's by another Jew, such as Mel Brooks. But Jews are quite comfortable denigrating Christianity. It's that simple. Many Christians have tired of seeing their beliefs put through the meat grinder by gays, Jews, atheists, and so on. In life, many Christians make a positive contribution to society, but you wouldn't think so by watching the news. Jews undoubtedly make positive contributions to society, but also very negative ones. When several members of the JDL (Jewish Defense League) were caught that were intent on destroying a Mosque and killing a Muslim lawmaker in the U.S., it hardly made the news. But if some Catholic Priest in a parish in the middle of Montana gets caught giving an underage kid a bottle of beer, whoa, this is national news. Dr. Artaud Why don't you post the bad things in th bible with the same glee you post the bad stuff from the talmud, Al?? I can guess why, it's not part of the jew hatin' hobby, is it?? How often do you get emails calling you a scumbag, or worse?? I hate to think how high the number is. BDK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Links-page with online action ! (Scanners/Helicam/ATC/AIS...etc) | Scanner | |||
Latest 50's Rock and Roll Shows Online | Broadcasting | |||
Hunter Hancock R&B DJ - Online Broadcast | Broadcasting | |||
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! | Scanner | |||
Apco scanner online ? | Scanner |