Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Women over 30 are so ugly!!! With clothes on it looks quite ok, but .....
The truth is that few people of either sex are goodlooking. With straight men, that doesn't seem to matter much. As long as they keep reasonably fit and clean, they can use their personality to attract females all their lives. The surplus of females helps here. Females are less fortunate, mainly because their personalities are unstable. Monthly hormone changes mean that they suffer from continual moodswings and then they hit the dreaded menopause. Females are therefore reduced to attracting a partner almost entirely on their looks alone. Most do possess a temporary attractiveness in their teens and twenties but this rapidly vanishes after they turn 30 and, by the age of 40, they mostly look like cardboard. This knowledge doesn't improve their personalities at all but it does make them spend a fortune on beauty products. It also makes them hate men, especially men who state the known truth. Some societies have a custom of couples marrying young, staying together until the children grow up and then divorcing. The man then goes on to lead a cerebral or spiritual life as a tribal elder, hunt leader or monk and the woman, now redundant, dies of starvation. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please take this to an appropriate news group -- try
alt.junk.battle.of.sexes or something But thanks for the OT alert This is for short wave discussions, at least most of us expect that it is! "Burr" wrote in message ... Women over 30 are so ugly!!! With clothes on it looks quite ok, but ..... The truth is that few people of either sex are goodlooking. Snipped for total junk |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
get lost, troll!
The truth is that few people of either sex are goodlooking. the truth is that nobody here is interested in your varicosities. 73 Bernhard |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very True.
Burr yachtboy! wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:55:06 GMT, Burr wrote: Women over 30 are so ugly!!! With clothes on it looks quite ok, but ..... Man, you are so far off the mark. At 30 they're just beginning to get interesting. Trust me. I'd take a 40 year old over a 20 year old any day. ========== "Being diabetic is alot like having an un-invited guest at a picnic, who keeps pointing out the potato salad may have gone bad."--W.B. Willis "Destiny has a strange sense of humor..." K. Honeycutt ---------- http://www.geocities.com/swl_yb400pe http://www.geocities.com/swl_yb400pe/psychedelic.htm http://www.geocities.com/swl_yb400pe/slinkypage.html "He not busy being born is busy dying..." B. Dylan ======================= |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone who posts their true ID and e-mail address here is asking for grief,
big time. Females particularly. I know several who have been stalked, received crank calls, numerous hate mail, and other incredible stuff. Once someone knows your name and possibly a ham call, it is no problem finding out where you live and a phone number. One person here who was stalked had costly legal action to get it stopped. No thanks Some Ham clubs have member phone numbers on line and that has caused a BIG problem when the nuts get a hold of it. And THEY DO!! Our club discontinued phone call listings when a lady member logged over 100 crank calls. I have had some real horror stories about my personal experiences with true IDing, but bottom line -- I am anon as a result. And how would you like someone to use your e-mail address to sign you up for porn sites and mail, singles and kinky chat rooms ??? Has happened to several I know here. And what does a true ID have to do with credibility??? Just read the bad info posted here and you will see true ID does not ensure that the poster knows what they are talking about. A well known Ham Alias system discontinued thier roster --- why -- because the nuts used it for spamming. nuff sed -- Oh Lord I'm Anon Again And Burr -- have you read the NG guidelines yet ??? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Burr" wrote in message ... When you get enough guts to sign your name and use you real address then you try telling someone what to do!! Burr Signal In The Noise wrote: Please take this to an appropriate news group -- try alt.junk.battle.of.sexes or something But thanks for the OT alert This is for short wave discussions, at least most of us expect that it is! "Burr" wrote in message ... Women over 30 are so ugly!!! With clothes on it looks quite ok, but ...... The truth is that few people of either sex are goodlooking. Snipped for total junk |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So True !!
40 is Twice as good as 20 . . . ( IMHO ) Dan ( Noting as fact: Sharon Stone is approaching 50 ; Susan Sarandon is on covers of NARP ; & Just how old is Demi Moore ?? ) In article , Burr writes: Women over 30 are so ugly!!! With clothes on it looks quite ok, but ..... Man, you are so far off the mark. At 30 they're just beginning to get interesting. Trust me. I'd take a 40 year old over a 20 year old any day. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An excellent site! | Homebrew | |||
problems reading W3UHF's icomclassic site, too much 'script' | Boatanchors | |||
Interesting site | Shortwave |