Dr Artaud wrote:

If you are a male, where you circumcised by religious
requirement or by your parents desire for better sanitation?

Interested in my penis, are you?

Were you circumcised by religious requirement? Are you Jewish? If asking
the question of circumcision denotes that I have a penis fetish, it doesn't
say much for Rabbis, does it?

http://www.circumcision.net/index.html (Jewish site on the Ritual of
Circumcision)

antisemitism [from quoted text far below]

Anti-Semitism, the word Semitism should be capitalized.
The world's most overused term, the automatic disqualifier for American
political office, in a country where less than 5% of the population is
Jewish, interesting. Let's examine the word: http://www.m-w.com/

Main Entry: Sem·ite
Pronunciation: 'se-"mIt, esp British 'sE-"mIt
Function: noun
Etymology: French sémite, from Semitic Shem, from Late Latin, from Greek
SEm, from Hebrew ShEm
Date: 1848
1 a : a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia
including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b : a descendant
of these peoples
2 : a member of a modern people speaking a Semitic language

Notice that Semites include Arabs. Interesting, one would not believe this
to be the case by the way the term is commonly applied. Most of the people
in the U.S. have been taught that the word means Jewish, and that anyone
that issues even the slightest criticism of a Jew must therefore be a rabid
anti-Semite. Never mind that people are taught by the Jews to hate Arabs
(certainly not without foundation in Israel, but one has to wonder with all
the foreign aid that Israel gets if the Eminent Gray One [believe it or
not, this word is in my dictionary but not available at online
dictionaries, it denotes an individual or individuals that secretly control
things behind the scenes] actually wants an end to the strife),
paradoxically making these very same people anti-Semites.

"Jews have been disproportionately active in civil rights and liberties
issues".

Your credulity is showing. If you feel that the Founders intended Larry
Flint to be the poster boy for the 1st Amendment, you are indeed a sick
individual. Pornography the likes of Hustler magazine and worse would have
caused the possessor of such material to receive the death penalty in when
the Constitution was founded. Conversely, the American Legal system is
founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs. The government and court systems for
much of the existence of this country have abounded with religious
symbolism, I don't think that we need modern day Jews to protect us from
something that the founders never expected us to need protected from.

Your mind in mired in liberal thinking, as is the minds of some others in
this group. Very few people actually take the time to research their posts,
they just make comments about bestiality, penis fetishes, etc. It's
eminently easier to be juvenile and insubstantial and never serious address
the posts of others, just to post the same mundane drivel in response.

As your reply illustrates, the only reason people like you mention the
ACLU in connection with the movie is antisemitism, and has nothing to
do with the facts. Jews have been disproportionately active in civil
rights and civil
liberties issues probably for historical reasons, having been subject
to legal and extra-legal discrimination for most of European history.
It is not a plot to pollute your vital fluids, but just a desire to
protect the rights guaranteed in our constitution.



Gray Shockley why consume more bandwidth grousing about people consuming
bandwidth with non-shortwave related posts?
Plonk me, killfile the thread, get on with your life.


Larry Ozarow
How about some of those pro-bestiality flicks that Artaud
has been watching on Sundance?

What's the matter Larry, did your mother fail to read the rest of the post
to you? Keep on plugging, in another 15 or so years, you might make manager
of the McDonalds where you work.


Dr. Artaud

Dr Artaud wrote:


Larry Ozarow

How about some of those pro-bestiality flicks that Artaud
has been watching on Sundance?


What's the matter Larry, did your mother fail to read the rest of the post
to you? Keep on plugging, in another 15 or so years, you might make manager
of the McDonalds where you work.


Dr. Artaud


I read the post, and by the way if you'd like to compare educational
level or income I'd be happy to. My doctorate is real, not self-conferred.

In my post I was referring offhandedly to your hysterical bashing of the
mass culture. If you don't like pornography or violence (or nature shows
- that's what I hate), don't watch it, I don't. If television is your
preferred form of entertainment, there's plenty of stuff on it that is
not pornographic or pro-gay or anti-Christian. That junk is not a plot,
it is just pursuit of income - that's what people like and pay to see.
I'm not saying I'm in favor of most of it, just that it's not something
imposed on us by a Jewish plot, it is just what we as a country want to
see. In European countries and Canada, which are for the most part far
LESS religious than the US, there is also far less obsession with sex
and violence. By the way, 15 years ago or so, when Martin Scorcese,
who is a believing Catholic, made "The Last Temptation of Christ," it
was subject to bomb threats, boycotts and censorship (Blockbuster
wouldn't carry it). I don't think the Jews were behind that - groups
will organize and protest, and in the case of "The Last Temptation," can
even threaten or commit violence when they think they are being attacked.

Interestingly, apropos your obsession with the evil Jews, Michael
Medved, who carried on a long, somewhat tiresome, and of course
unsuccessful crusade against sex in movies a number of years ago, has
been interviewed strongly condemning the outcry against the Mel Gibson
movie. Medved has been very active in the Jewish community.

Good Shabbos.

Nowhere in my posts did I suggest that there was a "plot". Me thinkst that
you have revealed your bias by referring to this non-existent assertion.

Oh, you have a Doctorate, excuse me a moment (yawn). Oh, I am impressed.
The saying goes, "Better that people think you're a fool than to open your
mouth and prove it". I suggest that you indeed have opened your mouth.

By the by, I don't even know who Michael Medved is, I don't listen to the
show. And pursuant to you claim of avoiding material that I find offensive,
why can't the Jews do the same with the movie Passion and the plethora of
other material that they are always claiming is anti-Semitism?

You never really answer any of the questions that I have queried of you,
you simply create new thought lines or refer to myopic aspects of my posts.

If you really don't know my background, why promulgate your own self
importance?

That junk is not a plot, it is just pursuit of income - that's
what people like and pay to see. I'm not saying I'm in favor of
most of it, just that it's not something imposed on us by a
Jewish plot, it is just what we as a country want to see.

Sir, there would be a massive audience for snuff movies, this doesn't
justify their dissemination in the mass media. By the by, I loved the "The
Last Temptation", I have watched it many many times. The Peter Gabriel
music is great, it really helps to make the movie. Also, if Catholics
protested it, I don't think that "all" Catholics did, let alone make death
threats. But there goes the generalization that ensues when Christians are
involved.

Look up the JDL for an example of an extremist group that goes unnoticed by
the media.


Dr. Artaud



Larry Ozarow wrote in
:

Dr Artaud wrote:


Larry Ozarow

How about some of those pro-bestiality flicks that Artaud
has been watching on Sundance?


What's the matter Larry, did your mother fail to read the rest of the
post to you? Keep on plugging, in another 15 or so years, you might
make manager of the McDonalds where you work.


Dr. Artaud


I read the post, and by the way if you'd like to compare educational
level or income I'd be happy to. My doctorate is real, not
self-conferred.

In my post I was referring offhandedly to your hysterical bashing of
the mass culture. If you don't like pornography or violence (or nature
shows - that's what I hate), don't watch it, I don't. If television is
your preferred form of entertainment, there's plenty of stuff on it
that is not pornographic or pro-gay or anti-Christian. That junk is
not a plot, it is just pursuit of income - that's what people like and
pay to see. I'm not saying I'm in favor of most of it, just that it's
not something imposed on us by a Jewish plot, it is just what we as a
country want to see. In European countries and Canada, which are for
the most part far LESS religious than the US, there is also far less
obsession with sex and violence. By the way, 15 years ago or so, when
Martin Scorcese, who is a believing Catholic, made "The Last
Temptation of Christ," it was subject to bomb threats, boycotts and
censorship (Blockbuster wouldn't carry it). I don't think the Jews
were behind that - groups will organize and protest, and in the case
of "The Last Temptation," can even threaten or commit violence when
they think they are being attacked.

Interestingly, apropos your obsession with the evil Jews, Michael
Medved, who carried on a long, somewhat tiresome, and of course
unsuccessful crusade against sex in movies a number of years ago, has
been interviewed strongly condemning the outcry against the Mel Gibson
movie. Medved has been very active in the Jewish community.

Good Shabbos.

Tony wrote:
"Larry Ozarow" wrote in message


Doctorate or not we still think you're an Idiot. Income has NO bearing on
the subject here at all.


I was answering artaud's stupid crack about
my working in a McDonald's. What's with the
"we" crap, you got a frog in your shorts?

Dr Artaud wrote:
Me thinkst

"Me thinkst" - the classic construction revealing its
author to be a true semi-literate.

Bye Bye

Oz

Dr Artaud wrote:
SNIP


"Jews have been disproportionately active in civil rights and liberties
issues".

Your credulity is showing. If you feel that the Founders intended Larry
Flint to be the poster boy for the 1st Amendment, you are indeed a sick
individual. Pornography the likes of Hustler magazine and worse would have
caused the possessor of such material to receive the death penalty in when
the Constitution was founded. Conversely, the American Legal system is
founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs. The government and court systems for
much of the existence of this country have abounded with religious
symbolism, I don't think that we need modern day Jews to protect us from
something that the founders never expected us to need protected from.

Yeah, cause the guys in 1800 were so brilliant that they foresaw every
issue history would confront us with. Get real, doc, even the most
swell-headed of them wouldn't have claimed that.

2nd, there were plenty of ribald libertines in the late 17th century
intellectual classes. I think Ben Franklin would probably have been a
contributor to Penthouse & Hustler.

By the way, what's with your Larry Flynt obsession? You think your
tastes should determine whether I can look at naughty pictures of
naked women? If so, **** you. You have the right to read all the
jew-hatin' nonsense you like. I have the right to look at naked
pictures.

--
Col. I.P. Yurin
Commissariat of Internal Security

Stakhanovite
Order of Lenin (1937)
Hero of Socialist Labor (1939)