Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis
ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Should I try a simple length of "counterpoise" wire as a ground? Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Meloche" wrote in message ... Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Most likely picking up common mode noise from your household wiring. Those grounds are great for 60 Hz, not so great for 1 MHz. Grounds often don't make a lot of difference for SW reception, but in some cases can make a world of differene (short run directly to an earth ground). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, DO ground your devices. Here in Finland, the BBC on shortwave
19 metres comes in at S=9 without grounding and S=9+40dB with grounding. Also weaker stations on so called tropical bands are not audible without this "counter part" to the antenna. Matti Ponkamo, 33 years of experience, Naantali, Finland "Brenda Ann" kirjoitti viestissä ... "Tony Meloche" wrote in message ... Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Most likely picking up common mode noise from your household wiring. Those grounds are great for 60 Hz, not so great for 1 MHz. Grounds often don't make a lot of difference for SW reception, but in some cases can make a world of differene (short run directly to an earth ground). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tony Meloche wrote: Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Two possible explanations come to mind: 1. Local radiating noise sources are mostly "e" field, as you are very close to them ("in the near field"). So connecting a ground may improve your reception of the noise more than it does the signal. 2. You may have noise on your wiring's Green Wire. EVERY PC I've ever opened has used the Green Wire as its operating ground, as the electrical code forces it (the metal enclosure, being a conductive object the user can touch, MUST be so grounded). So you may have digital hash on your ground, being conducted into your receiver with you antenna acting as a counterpoise. Should I try a simple length of "counterpoise" wire as a ground? Sure. Also, see if you can't rig up some sort of 'extension' to your original antenna, so you can have a 'balanced' antenna that doesn't need to work against ground. I say that knowing a chorous of voices will immediately arise, saying "That will work better with an impedance-matching balun." True, but just connecting with a piece of twinlead or even zip cord will still work. -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Meloche wrote:
Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. AC power in the US is at an extremely low frequency of 60 Hz, which has a wavelength of around 5000 kilometers! This means it takes a 5000 km long length of wire before you see just one full cycle. 360 degrees in 5000000 meters, or about 0.000072 degrees of phase shift per meter! The voltage at all points along a 10 meter length of wire at 60 Hz is for all intents and purposes, exactly the same at both ends, and it's an excellent ground. Not so at 10 Mhz (10,000,000 Hz), where the wavelength is just 30 meters. You'll see a whole RF wave across only 30 meters of wire. 360 degrees in 30 meters is 12 degrees per meter of phase shift. That means the voltage and current at each end of the wire will be significantly different, and it's NOT an excellent ground. In fact, it's more like a 1/3 wavelength antenna that's grounded on one end, than an RF ground. **** poor ground, it is. You didn't mention whether you live on the ground floor. If not, you're already doomed for having a good quality electrical ground at *RF* frequencies. Also, your results are poor with the ground, probably because AC power system noise is coming in through your ground wire. At RF frequencies, an AC power ground may be very poor, because a length of wire becomes an antenna, even if one end is grounded. Once you have 20 or 30 feet of wire before it goes to an actual earth ground, I think all bets are off. The best ground for an antenna system is probably the shortest and most direct to earth, independent of and as far away from noisy wiring as possible. In this case, it would be better to ground the antenna and feed your signal in via coax cable, than attempt to ground the receiver chassis. (Unless it's an old tube radio with a screw terminal for the ground. These may provide a measure of electrical safety. But otherwise... avoid.) Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Should I try a simple length of "counterpoise" wire as a ground? Given how noisy AC wiring can be, it can't hurt to experiment. Try running the counterpoise wire so it's as low to the ground (or floor) as possible. It may well outperform your AC "ground", which probably is feeding in massive amounts of electrical noise directly into your radio. If it turns out to work better one way over another, don't argue with results. :-) This, of course, is all my opinion. Please accept it as such. -- Ross Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ross:
I really appreciate your response to this (now aging) post, and the final result was that I ran a ground wire a total of 30" long to a galvanized steel rod sunk 6' in the the ground right outside my ground floor window. Problem solved. It is most noticeable on MW, where it is *much* quieter. Again, appreciate your response. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TM,
Household Electrical Ground and a 'good' RF Grounding Point often are two different things. IOW: "Good" Electrical Wire Code and "Good" Radio RF Reception are not necessarily the same thing. YDTRT: What you did is the right thing to do. - - - Try It and If It Works: Use It / If Not Don't Use It. ?Q? What Radio? Type of Radio? Were You Using ? - Direct A/C Powered ? - - A/C Adapter to DC Power ? - - - Battery Power ? GROUNDING a Process of Alternatives: 1. If you can install a Ground Rod and a short(est) Ground Wire to connect to you radio then: Try This First. - - - IMHO: A Ground Rod and Grounding Point at the Antenna with Coax Cable as a FeedLine to the Radio would be Better. 2. Try a Cold Water Pipe if you have metal piping in your house/building. 3. If the above does not work for you: Then try using a counterpoise vice an actual ground. 4. Household Electrical Ground at the A/C OutLet is usually the Last Option in Today's High "Man Made Noise" (RFI/EMF) Household Environments. TIP: If this is a Stand-A-Lone Battery Powered 'portable' SW Radio that is simply using the built-in WHIP Antenna: - You may wish to try a "Place Mat" ground plane reflector. - - Plastic Place Mat (12"X18") or Paper Desk Blotter (24"x36") with some Aluminum Foil under it connected to a 'good' ground (or not). - - - With some 'portable' SW Radios in some locations this is the Magic That Works. (No Theory Required - Hey, Simply It Works! - SomeTimes ![]() iane ~ RHF .. .. = = = Tony Meloche = = = wrote in message ... Why would reception improve - and noise drop - when the chassis ground to the receiver is removed? This is noticeable on SW, but *very* noticeable on MW. Ground connection is to faceplate screw of a (verified) grounded 3-prong outlet, the best grouond I can muster, at the moment. Should I try a simple length of "counterpoise" wire as a ground? Tony |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ross I agree 100 percent with your suggestion to experiment. I installed a
12-gauge wire directly from my receiver down to a 6-foot ground rod. Total length of ground wire about 8 feet. At the low end of the receiver, around 100kHz, the ground is a definite improvement. At the high end near 30MHz it actually introduces more noise. My solution was to put a switch in the ground wire near the receiver. When I do a major frequency change I simply flip the switch back and forth for the best position and, as you said, not argue with the results. When I'm not using the receiver I leave the ground hooked up, it makes for a nice static discharge path. Al KA5JGV "Ross Archer" wrote in message ... Given how noisy AC wiring can be, it can't hurt to experiment. Try running the counterpoise wire so it's as low to the ground (or floor) as possible. It may well outperform your AC "ground", which probably is feeding in massive amounts of electrical noise directly into your radio. If it turns out to work better one way over another, don't argue with results. :-) -- Ross |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
What's this inductor doin'? | Homebrew | |||
Ground connections to a tower | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |