This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many followers he
has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!

On 11 Oct 2003 00:13:33 GMT, (Soames123) wrote:



This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many followers he
has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!

Well I think most far right wing Conservative Christians are misguided
and trade ethics/virtues for morals. Where the Bible offers this
advice, I simply do not know. The pharisees suffered from the same
misguidance.

Julian Borger in Washington
Saturday October 11, 2003
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/internatio...060907,00.html

The king of American talk-radio, Rush Limbaugh, stunned his 20 million
conservative listeners yesterday by confessing on air to years of addiction
to painkillers and declaring he had booked himself into a drug clinic for a
month.

The confession came days after the tabloid revelations of a former maid who
claimed she bought thousands of prescription pills on the black market for
Mr Limbaugh, and the confirmation by the police near his Florida home that
they were looking into an illegal drug ring.

The revelations sent shock waves through Middle America, where the talk-show
host has been one of the most influential figures over the past decade,
appealing to poor, angry whites with a mixture of conservative values and
vehement loathing of the liberal "elites" that he claims dominate the east
and west coasts and the national media.

"You know I have always tried to be honest with you and open about my life.
So I need to tell you today that part of what you have heard and read is
correct. I am addicted to prescription pain medication," Mr Limbaugh, said
on his radio show yesterday, explaining that he became addicted after he was
prescribed painkillers after back surgery several years ago.

"Immediately following this broadcast, I am checking myself into a treatment
centre for the next 30 days to once and for all break the hold this highly
addictive medication has on me," Mr Limbaugh said.

The revelation was the latest controversy to engulf the radio personality.
Last week, he resigned as a commentator on American football following an
on-air suggestion that one player was overrated because he was black. The
remarks provoked uproar.

According to press reports Mr Limbaugh was taking two drugs: OxyContin and
hydrocodone. The right-wing icon's plight has illustrated a quiet epidemic
spreading across America, particularly in rural areas, where OxyContin
dependence is so prevalent the powerful painkiller is known as "hillbilly
heroin".
In 2001, Mr Limbaugh signed a nine year radio syndication deal worth well
over $200m (£120m). In part, his career has hinged on denunciation of
liberal attitudes, including tolerance towards drug-addicted celebrities. He
was aware of the irony in his remarks yesterday.

"Over the years athletes and celebrities have emerged from treatment centres
to great fanfare and praise for conquering great demons. They are said to be
great role models and examples for others," the 52-year-old radio host said.

Well, I am no role model. I refuse to let anyone think I am doing something
great here, when there are people you never hear about, who face long odds
and never resort to such escapes. They are the role models. I am no
victim... I take full responsibility for my problem."

(Soames123) wrote in
:

See, that is where the liberals and democrats have set themselves up in a
good way. They are so ethically and sexually depraved and so drug ridden
that no one expects any level of decency from them.

Imagine the ensuing scandal when a democrat revels to a shocked public
that he or she is heterosexual, or that they stopped having sex in the
Whitehouse while important officials were waiting outside, or that they
elected to have a child rather than abort it, or that they actually
attend Religious services.

My my, the litmus test that conservatives must pass in liberal eyes. Any
failure of a liberal is expected, any failure of a conservative must be
excoriated. If a liberal were a serial killer, he'd expect all people to
be serial killers to validate his/her character defect.

In a story by Robert Louis Stevenson, the reason that an individual may
have failings but still rail against evil is represented by the following
quote: "My love of good is damned to barrenness; it may, and let it be!
But I have still my hatred of evil; and from that, to your galling
disappointment, you shall see that I can draw both energy and courage."

Here is the link to the entire story, if you're liberal, you probably
won't understand it, but for the others:
Markheim http://www.classicreader.com/read.ph...6/bookid.1372/

In the liberal world, all things are depraved, liberals actually conspire
to make things even more depraved, and there are few things that liberals
hate more than Righteousness. To reiterate, liberals have no real moral
system, they are brazen adulterers, drug users, homosexuals, etc.
Certainly these traits occur in the conservative world, but in general,
conservatives tend to disparage this type of conduct, even when they have
been personally afflicted by it. You can be a murder and deplore murder,
quite vociferously, most people wouldn't argue about the hypocrisy of a
murderer denouncing murder. But the hypocrisy of a drug user denouncing
drug users is more than liberals can tolerate.

This is also why liberals are so successful politically. For example,
they endorse Women's Rights, but give a "pass go" card to a man that
likely was responsible for molesting women, certainly engaging in
behavior degrading to women. But, since this person stood to politically
support their cause, they were willing to sacrifice the very principles
that they, at least ostensibly, aspire to. They truly have no core
values, the issue is everything, and whatever is necessary to attain the
issue is all that is important. The media does whatever is necessary to
shield the liberal from his/her own hypocrisy while parading around with
every incident of conservative hypocrisy.

When Christ walked the earth, the Apostles at times had egregious
failings, Christ didn't turn them away and look for new messengers.
Concerning Rush, the message is valid, but the messenger is flawed.
Nothing new there!

Dr Artaud




This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many
followers he has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!

See, that is where the liberals and democrats
SNIP


"Over the years athletes and celebrities have emerged from treatment centres
to great fanfare and praise for conquering great demons. They are said to be
great role models and examples for others," the 52-year-old radio host said."

"Dr. Artaud" wrote in message . 3.44...
(Soames123) wrote in
:

See, that is where the liberals and democrats have set themselves up in a
good way. They are so ethically and sexually depraved and so drug ridden
that no one expects any level of decency from them.

Imagine the ensuing scandal when a democrat revels to a shocked public
that he or she is heterosexual, or that they stopped having sex in the
Whitehouse while important officials were waiting outside, or that they
elected to have a child rather than abort it, or that they actually
attend Religious services.

My my, the litmus test that conservatives must pass in liberal eyes. Any
failure of a liberal is expected, any failure of a conservative must be
excoriated. If a liberal were a serial killer, he'd expect all people to
be serial killers to validate his/her character defect.

In a story by Robert Louis Stevenson, the reason that an individual may
have failings but still rail against evil is represented by the following
quote: "My love of good is damned to barrenness; it may, and let it be!
But I have still my hatred of evil; and from that, to your galling
disappointment, you shall see that I can draw both energy and courage."

Here is the link to the entire story, if you're liberal, you probably
won't understand it, but for the others:
Markheim http://www.classicreader.com/read.ph...6/bookid.1372/

In the liberal world, all things are depraved, liberals actually conspire
to make things even more depraved, and there are few things that liberals
hate more than Righteousness. To reiterate, liberals have no real moral
system, they are brazen adulterers, drug users, homosexuals, etc.
Certainly these traits occur in the conservative world, but in general,
conservatives tend to disparage this type of conduct, even when they have
been personally afflicted by it. You can be a murder and deplore murder,
quite vociferously, most people wouldn't argue about the hypocrisy of a
murderer denouncing murder. But the hypocrisy of a drug user denouncing
drug users is more than liberals can tolerate.

This is also why liberals are so successful politically. For example,
they endorse Women's Rights, but give a "pass go" card to a man that
likely was responsible for molesting women, certainly engaging in
behavior degrading to women. But, since this person stood to politically
support their cause, they were willing to sacrifice the very principles
that they, at least ostensibly, aspire to. They truly have no core
values, the issue is everything, and whatever is necessary to attain the
issue is all that is important. The media does whatever is necessary to
shield the liberal from his/her own hypocrisy while parading around with
every incident of conservative hypocrisy.

When Christ walked the earth, the Apostles at times had egregious
failings, Christ didn't turn them away and look for new messengers.
Concerning Rush, the message is valid, but the messenger is flawed.
Nothing new there!

Dr Artaud




This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many
followers he has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!



You do realize Robert Louis Stevenson was a pedophile, don't you?

troika boika

(troika boika) wrote in
om:


I guess it would be asking too much for you to list links to genuine
articles that discuss the particulars of his pedophilic activities? A
good link, not to a bulletin board, but to a site of significance that
authoritatively discusses your claim.

Read my post again, and listen to the parts of hating evil. In true
liberal fashion, you completely ignore all aspects of the post, rather,
you focus on a tiny aspect that germinates in your mind. I have seen this
endlessly with liberals, one way to escape the truth is to find
shortcomings in one aspect of the discussion, then obsess about it,
usually by shouting and not giving the other person a chance to say
anything else.

Refer to Woody Allen

"Woody Allen may be a pervert and a pedophile, but he's also a comedic
genius (you could say the same for me" (sic)

"Like most Woody Allen films, MANHATTAN is a melange of relationships
gone wrong, only here there ... And it does expose Woody's charming
pedophile side so" (sic)

The above 2 sentences are from links easily gleaned by doing a search on
Google for Woody Allen Pedophile. Notice the affectionate way that the
sentences refer to Woody Allen's pedophilic proclivities. Woody is
readily accepted by the liberal community, therefore his perversities are
forgiven, no liberal cares to actually pursue prosecution of him for it.
If a conservative would become involved in such sick activities, the
media would make endless fanfare about it.

This is exactly what I described in my original post. Perverted liberals
are given the green light for their activities since no one expects
better of them anyway. On an odd note, the authorities in Florida are
trying to determine if they can prosecute Rush for his illegal drug
purchases, but routinely allow thousands to go through drug rehab without
the fear of prosecution. If they prosecute Rush, I would suggest that
they examine the databases at the drug rehab centers and prosecute ALL
people that were purchasing drugs illegally.

Martha Stewart is still undergoing scrutiny for her alleged misdoings in
securities, but Hillary received no significant attention for her alleged
misdoings in commodities.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/depart.../2000/vo16no09
_answers.htm

Q. When Hillary Clinton was making a killing in cattle futures what was
the typical profit that the average investor might have legally made in
that market?
- T.E., South Jordan, UT
A. The story of Mrs. Clinton's "investment" in cattle futures made major
news about six years ago. Somehow, though a rookie in the business, she
had turned $1,000 into $100,000. How this had happened was explained
variously as applying what she had read in the Wall Street Journal or, as
she once claimed, "I was lucky."
Only the terminally gullible believe that. One examination revealed the
odds of Hillary's making such a return were 24 chances in a million.
"There is no way that the commodity exchange or a broker would permit a
novice speculator to control $280,000 worth of cattle with a skimpy
investment of $1,000, " noted the New York Post. "Not, that is, unless a
friend, guardian or partner guaranteed her investment."

Martha Stewart: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...sp?ARTICLE_ID=
32924

"They don't care whether she broke laws, they're just delighted to take
her down a peg, or two, or more. How dare she have standards? (Yeah,
she's tough - and?)! How dare she enjoy doing homely tasks? How dare she
encourage women and children and, indeed, all family members to care
about grace and beauty in the home?" (Certainly not a charge to be
leveled at Hillary)


You have helped my to elucidate this issue, your post was greatly
appreciated.

Dr. Artaud


You do realize Robert Louis Stevenson was a pedophile, don't you?

troika boika

"Soames123" wrote in message
...


This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many
followers he
has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!



How can we know what Rush Limbaugh is for or against? He's playing a
character he created. I don't know if Rush really does think drug abuse is
immoral or not. However, in real life, Jack Benny was generous and Harpo
Marx could talk.

Frank Dresser

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:51:32 -0500, Frank Dresser wrote
(in message ):


"Soames123" wrote in message
...


This reminds me so much of Jimmy Sawggart...and look at how many
followers he
has now... I think it's about 27. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!

This reminds me of Jimmy Swaggart. Jimmy S. always preached against
pornography.
Rush Limbaugh was bitterly against drug use. There is a God!!



How can we know what Rush Limbaugh is for or against? He's playing a
character he created. I don't know if Rush really does think drug abuse is
immoral or not. However, in real life, Jack Benny was generous and Harpo
Marx could talk.

Frank Dresser



Not only that but Harpo heard harp decades before most other people.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------
Entropy Maintenance Technician
Tao Chemical Company
--------------------------

http://www.cybercoffee.org/
Vicksburg, Mississippi US