Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table
radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results (bear with me, I intend to post these in sections so as not to lose the content to the Cookie Monster): 87.9 88.1 WUBJ Jamestown, NY Public Jazz 10 miles (Repeater of 88.7 WBFO Buffalo) 88.3 88.5 88.7 WBFO Buffalo, NY Public Jazz 58 miles 88.9 WYFG Jamestown, NY Christian 10 miles 89.1 WCID Friendship, NY Christian 57 miles CBLA FM 2 Kitchener-Waterloo CBC radio 97 miles 89.3 WQED Pittsburgh, PA Public Classical 121 miles 89.5 89.7 WNJA Jamestown, NY Public Classical 10 miles (Repeater of 94.5 WNED Buffalo) 89.9 CBC FM 2 Paris, Ontario CBC French Service 97 miles (Parallel to 90.3 CJBC Toronto) 90.1 WPSB Kane, PA Public Classical 37 miles (Part of Penn State's Radio Network) 90.3 CJBC Toronto, Ontario CBC French Service 109 miles (Part of "La Chaine Culterelle") 90.5 CBLA FM 1 Niagra-Crystal Beach, Ontario 70 miles CBC Radio (Parallel to CBC One on 99.1?) 90.7 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() grumpus wrote: Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results (4 part log snipped). Good post, Grumpus. It appears that the radio has excellent sensitivity with a very conventional antenna, and that your maximum distance reception was about 120 miles - that would be top-end for any good FM receiver with a dipole. It also appears that CING, Burlington (Hamilton) is the old CKDS that I used to listen to all day when I was working in Western New York during the summers of 1970, '71 and '72. I would be more interested in how many of those stations past the 90 mile range you were getting in good, listenable stereo. In "the old days", any good, two-channel stereo image at a distance of 100 miles was considered to be top-flight FM DX. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Meloche wrote in message ...
grumpus wrote: Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results I love my Model 88 but have never (with any radio) tried FM DX, even though I have an amplified RS ATV UHF/FM antenna which gives me a GOOD solid lock on locals, no doubt! And the sound of the 88 is really incredible. I got mine for $89 on eBay through an online store called HiFi.com, very good to deal with.... not sure if they are still around. Adam |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Meloche wrote in message ...
grumpus wrote: Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results (4 part log snipped). Good post, Grumpus. It appears that the radio has excellent sensitivity with a very conventional antenna, and that your maximum distance reception was about 120 miles - that would be top-end for any good FM receiver with a dipole. It also appears that CING, Burlington (Hamilton) is the old CKDS that I used to listen to all day when I was working in Western New York during the summers of 1970, '71 and '72. I would be more interested in how many of those stations past the 90 mile range you were getting in good, listenable stereo. In "the old days", any good, two-channel stereo image at a distance of 100 miles was considered to be top-flight FM DX. Tony Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile plus stations in "good, listenable stereo". This exercise was intended more as a DXing demonstration with bare bones equipment in challenging conditions than anything else. Still, one of the presets is set to 99.1 CBLA-FM Toronto CBC Radio One which is 109 miles from my location. Overnight they replay a variety of newscasts from around the world. Very often their signal comes in in stereo, especially during the Winter. I don't think I've even begun to maximize the Model 88's FM performance. For one thing, my ground floor location is bounded on the south by an enormous three story triplex 40' away, and a two story home 6' away on the north. I think if I can get a good Yagi up above the rooftops this radio would really shine. Regards, Grumpus ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
grumpus wrote:
Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile I think you mean 95.3 for CING. It swapped frequencies with CJXY a year or two ago. Neither station is actually "new". 95.3 was CKDS in 1973; 107.9 came into existence as CING in 1976. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote in message ...
grumpus wrote: Hi Tony. Neither the Gale Directory or CING's website indicate a history for this station before 1976 under whatever call letters, but you may well be correct. Bruce Elving's newest FM Atlas shows that CING has migrated to 105.3 and a new station, CJXY, now occupies 107.9. It would be a stretch to say that I get a lot of the 90 mile I think you mean 95.3 for CING. It swapped frequencies with CJXY a year or two ago. Neither station is actually "new". 95.3 was CKDS in 1973; 107.9 came into existence as CING in 1976. You're probably right Doug, I wasn't sure if I remembered CING's new frequency correctly even as I wrote it down...goes to show you don't always fly when you wing it. Regards ![]() Grumpus |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A little station history.
Ontario CING-FM Burlington, Shaw Radio Ltd. 1976 CING-FM began broadcasting on September 23. The station was owned by Burlington Broadcasting Inc. Studios were at 4144 South Service Road. CING operated on 107.9 MHz with 100,000 (50,000 horizontal & 50,000 vertical) watts effective radiated power. Antenna height - 500 feet or 152.4 metres. 1978 September - FM 108 begins playing oldies, on the all-night show. 1980 CING-FM adopts an oldies and nostalgia format as FM 108. 1981 FM 108 began playing The Music of Your Life from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., with oldies through the rest of the day. 1989 March 3 - CING-FM began using the CRN satellite service overnight. 1991 September 1 - CING-FM changed to a dance format, as DANCE 108. 1997 On April 9, the CRTC approved a power decrease for CING-FM, from 50,000 to 26,100 watts, and a relocation of the transmitting facilities to a new site approximately eight kilometres northwest of Burlington and to increase the antenna height. On June 10, the CRTC approved an application by Shaw Radio Ltd., and a group of individual shareholders to purchase Burlington Broadcasting Inc (CING-FM). Later in the year, Shaw acquired 100% of CING-FM. "Tony Meloche" wrote in message ... grumpus wrote: Hi all. This past Spring I put my Cambridge Soundworks Model 88 table radio, designed by the late Henry Kloss, through its paces on the FM broadcast band. For the duration of the test, the radio sat in one place in a ground floor room. The only antenna used was a cheap $2 plastic dipole tacked haphazardly to the wall; it too remained in one place throughout the test. Here are my results (4 part log snipped). Good post, Grumpus. It appears that the radio has excellent sensitivity with a very conventional antenna, and that your maximum distance reception was about 120 miles - that would be top-end for any good FM receiver with a dipole. It also appears that CING, Burlington (Hamilton) is the old CKDS that I used to listen to all day when I was working in Western New York during the summers of 1970, '71 and '72. I would be more interested in how many of those stations past the 90 mile range you were getting in good, listenable stereo. In "the old days", any good, two-channel stereo image at a distance of 100 miles was considered to be top-flight FM DX. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) | Policy |