Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello, Pete!
Well, good news, indeed! YES, sync detection is important. I think my priorities would be as follows: 1. QUIET front - end. No synthesizer noise. 2. GOOD filter(S). If you I can only have one, 6 KHz with tight skirts would be very good. 3. GOOD audio. That doesn't have to be expensive. 4. The aforementioned Synchronous Detection. Reading your words about having a Synch. Detector that "follows the signal down into the noise" makes me grin from ear to ear! I think that, with a quiet front end, my unamplified four - foot loop will do wonders. I am, from time to time, plagued with noise, so I think a part of the design philosophy should be a quiet synthesizer design. That, coupled with a good passive antenna, makes for some really easy listening. I've learned from Mark Connelly and John Doty that signal to noise ratio is everything! VY 73s, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, MN (Posting from work via Google, so this might not show up for a couple of days) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sure will! It will be available to anybody who wants it!
I just talked to my Analog Devices rep about getting ahold of an eval board for the AD607; I already have one for the AD831 high level mixer. I've got some samples of the Philips TEA6810, but I am not sure if that will do anything other than 9 and 10kHz steps, so I may go with the Analog Devices unit for the mixer, along with an Analog Devices PLL. I remember that some of their devices had a pretty quiet phase detector, with a spec around -152dBc. I am still working on the details of the spectrum analyzer portion of the receiver, and I still have to work on the crystal filter.................maybe Temec will have a good off the shelf filter. PTI does have them, but their price for a 8-pole unit is around 150 dollars. PDI, up in Delevan, Wisconsin, might also have something. I think that this will be a cool unit. The reps have been pretty excited about the project, telling me things like "get me one, once it becomes available". This will be a good thing. Pete grumpus wrote in message m... (Stephen M.H. Lawrence) wrote in message . com... Hello, Pete! Well, good news, indeed! YES, sync detection is important. I think my priorities would be as follows: 1. QUIET front - end. No synthesizer noise. 2. GOOD filter(S). If you I can only have one, 6 KHz with tight skirts would be very good. 3. GOOD audio. That doesn't have to be expensive. 4. The aforementioned Synchronous Detection. Reading your words about having a Synch. Detector that "follows the signal down into the noise" makes me grin from ear to ear! I think that, with a quiet front end, my unamplified four - foot loop will do wonders. I am, from time to time, plagued with noise, so I think a part of the design philosophy should be a quiet synthesizer design. That, coupled with a good passive antenna, makes for some really easy listening. I've learned from Mark Connelly and John Doty that signal to noise ratio is everything! VY 73s, Steve Lawrence Burnsville, MN (Posting from work via Google, so this might not show up for a couple of days) Hey Pete, if this project comes to fruition, will it be available to us pilgrims out here in the hinters? Regards, Grumpus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
W7ZOI/K5IRK High Performance RX | Homebrew | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
KE9OA's High Performance MW Receiver | Shortwave | |||
KE9OA's High Performance MW Receiver | Shortwave | |||
High performance MW receiver | Shortwave |