"N8KDV" wrote in message
...


donutbandit wrote:

N8KDV wrote in
:


Subject says it all!


Did they capture him, or one of his many doubles? Latter far more
likely.

It must be pretty horrific to live in your delusional world. Our heartfelt
condolences and sincere wishes that the New Year will be better for you!

Actually, Saddy was positively ID'ed by Tariq Azziz, and also by DNA tests.



"Bush may be a moron of sorts, but he is not stupid"
Eric Alterman

King Pineapple wrote:

Aaron Brown on CNN was very sad. Dan Rather on CBS too.

Interesting how some people see what they want to see. I'm sure you'd
approve of the Fox gang having a "We Got Him" party on the air. It would
certainly be in keeping with their agenda.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"HFguy" wrote in message ...
King Pineapple wrote:

Aaron Brown on CNN was very sad. Dan Rather on CBS too.

Interesting how some people see what they want to see. I'm sure you'd
approve of the Fox gang having a "We Got Him" party on the air. It would
certainly be in keeping with their agenda.
================================================== ========================

Yea like MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC dont have an agenda.
Get real. People "should" be celebrating, this was a bad/evil guy and getting
him alive non the less is a good thing. Its amazing when his 2 kids were
killed, all the above networks whined about them ending up dead. Now
we get the old man alive and their whining about that. No agenda though.


Jeff

DougSlug wrote:
Nope, the ID was confirmed by Tariq Azziz, and by DNA tests. What else can
we laugh at you about?

It's Sadam alright. But nonetheless, do you not think it strange that
Tariq Aziz (sp?) would be held out as a credible source?

--
M2

Jeff Santee wrote:

"HFguy" wrote in message ...
King Pineapple wrote:

Aaron Brown on CNN was very sad. Dan Rather on CBS too.

Interesting how some people see what they want to see. I'm sure you'd
approve of the Fox gang having a "We Got Him" party on the air. It would
certainly be in keeping with their agenda.
================================================== ========================

Yea like MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC dont have an agenda.
Get real. People "should" be celebrating, this was a bad/evil guy and getting
him alive non the less is a good thing. Its amazing when his 2 kids were
killed, all the above networks whined about them ending up dead. Now
we get the old man alive and their whining about that. No agenda though.

Jeff

I don't know what news programs you're watching but I didn't see anyone
"whining" about the capture of Sadaam on the networks you mention above.
It's not the job of a news program to "celebrate" a story.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In article ,
"DougSlug" wrote:

Just in time to include it in the re-election campaign. More likely it is
one of the many Saddam stand-ins....



You enjoy displaying your stupidity, don't you?

No, but they do it anyway.

"HFguy" wrote in message ...
It's not the job of a news program to "celebrate" a story.

In article , Michael Moore
writes:


DougSlug wrote:
Nope, the ID was confirmed by Tariq Azziz, and by DNA tests. What else can
we laugh at you about?

It's Sadam alright. But nonetheless, do you not think it strange that
Tariq Aziz (sp?) would be held out as a credible source?

--
M2

yeah, Ol' Tariq probably had no reason NOT to be honest;
Body language, tatoos on his hands, DNA tests; all him!

NOW when he is interrogated,
we'll find out some very interesting stuff..
Problem is, he should be alive up to & during his trial;
hence the physical to determine his state of health..
- & I wonder what OTHER medical tests they did on him
that they didn't film..

- He did look a bit nervous there...

"Fred Garvin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:17:03 -0500, JJ wrote:

Fred Garvin wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:01:43 -0500, N8KDV wrote:



Subject says it all!



Big ****ing deal, he still breaths air. That's just wrong.

The big pussy didn't even have the decency to kill himself.

It is much more demoralizing to his followers to see him taken alive in
in the humiliating state he was found in than as a dead martyr.


Nonsense. They don't really give a ****. We should have blown his freaking
head
off. Screw that "martyr" nonsense.

You underestimate the eastern importance of martyrdom. Even if the
insurgents do not like Saddam, they would still have used his death as a
(very effective) rallying cry. For us to have shot him, especially without
him putting up any fight, would have shown the insurgents that the infidels
were nothing more than animals, ripe for the slaughter.

In article , Fred Garvin
writes:



Why, yes it does suck. There is no reason to be thrilled that we have him.
He is not going to give us any info. We should have blew his head off.


Vee Haff Vays Of Making Him Talk . . .
( He's noit a tough guy; He'll talk ! ! )