Frank Dresser wrote:
snipped

Hoagland doesn't know the half of it. The entire planet is made out of
Chevy Vegas, which explains why Mars consists of little but rust.

I thought they were Datsun-1200's. I never saw a car disintegrate like
that one. The front shock towers would collapse until the tires were
rubbing on the inside of the wheel wells. If you tried to weld what was
left of the sheet metal, it would vaporize in a puff of smoke. All of
this was because the Japanese experimented with recycled steel by
laminating (compressing) it into new sheet metal. The problem was they
didn't get the trapped air and water out of the layers with the
compressing process. The cars literally rusted from the inside out.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"starman" wrote in message
...


I thought they were Datsun-1200's. I never saw a car disintegrate like
that one. The front shock towers would collapse until the tires were
rubbing on the inside of the wheel wells. If you tried to weld what
was
left of the sheet metal, it would vaporize in a puff of smoke. All of
this was because the Japanese experimented with recycled steel by
laminating (compressing) it into new sheet metal. The problem was they
didn't get the trapped air and water out of the layers with the
compressing process. The cars literally rusted from the inside out.



This radical Datsun 1200 theory conflicts with the now well established
theory of Vega Martiian origins. Let's conider the familiar Martian
monument to the greatest egotistical phoney in the universe. While it
has been long assumed the face at Cydonia is an image of Richard C.
Hoagland, my studies have revealed it is actually a monument to the
father of the Vega, John Z. Delorean. This fact can be confirmed by
anyone who can make out the inscription on the base of the monument --
"There is no ice on the Martian snowcaps".

Frank Dresser

Leonard Martin wrote:

Seriously for a moment. When I heard the first 15 minutes of this nonsense
I was mystified and troubled: I heard Hoagy explaining the technical
aspects of the space shuttle destruction earlier this year, and he was
great. He really seemed to know what he was talking about and he explained
it clearly. How can so intelligent a person make a career of pedalling
nonsense? I can see stupid people doing it, but I think intelligent people
tend to have a natural respect for the truth.
Anyone have any opinions on this human conundrum?

Leonard



In article ,
mail wrote:


On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:16:43 GMT, "Irony Alert"
wrote:



It could be worse, he could think that lighting farts is what causes El
Nino.


Don't give him any ideas.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"Shake it like a polaroid picture."
- Andre 3000 of Outkast




Hoagland is not a scientist, he does not do science.

Hoagland is a performance artist. He does what he does as part of an
act that pays him enough so as to avoid real work.

To the best of my knowledge Hoagland has never held a job in the
traditional sense of the word, I seriously doubt he is employable at all.

\\ The Commentator // wrote:

Hoagland is not a scientist, he does not do science.

Hoagland is a performance artist. He does what he does as part of an
act that pays him enough so as to avoid real work.

To the best of my knowledge Hoagland has never held a job in the
traditional sense of the word, I seriously doubt he is employable at all.

He was a science advisor to Walter Cronkite in the 60's and apparently
the curator of a science museum. I wonder what kind of nonsense he fed
Cronkite in those days?


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"starman" wrote in message
...

He was a science advisor to Walter Cronkite in the 60's and apparently
the curator of a science museum. I wonder what kind of nonsense he fed
Cronkite in those days?



Considering Hoagland's credibility, I wonder if he even met Walter
Cronkite.

Frank Dresser

"Glenn W. Cooper" wrote:

You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away and
over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of
occasions.

GC.

Name one.

"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
"\The Commentator//" wrote in message
...
"Glenn W. Cooper" wrote:

You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away
and
over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of
occasions.

GC.

Name one.

Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him
seriously.

--

The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock

Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.

Irony Alert wrote:

"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
"\The Commentator//" wrote in message
...
"Glenn W. Cooper" wrote:

You're being too hard on Hoagland. Sure, he gets a little carried away
and
over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of
occasions.

GC.

Name one.

Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him
seriously.



There is that, good point.

"Irony Alert" wrote in message
news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54...
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of
occasions.

Name one.

Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him
seriously.


But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if
he had said that no one takes him seriously.

Gazmik wrote:

"Irony Alert" wrote in message
news:HMKMb.37811$Rc4.158683@attbi_s54...
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
over-exuberant at times, but he's also been very RIGHT on a number of
occasions.

Name one.

Hoaxy was right the time I heard him admit that "not everyone" takes him
seriously.


But, he wasn't exactly right when he said that. He would have been right if
he had said that no one takes him seriously.

Not exactly true. There are enough hoagbots out there who manage to
swallow his stories and pay him enough so that he does not have to work.