On 06 Feb 2004 05:11:55 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: Telamon lid

You are a loser and a waste of time.

Plonk


So, does two plonks make an unplonk?


It's the only thing he has to offer usenet. Plonk...plonk...plonk...

It's his mom's middle name.

Tracy

From: Tracy Fort

It's the only thing he has to offer usenet. Plonk...plonk...plonk...

It's his mom's middle name.


OK, that's kind of funny... ;-)

"N8KDV" wrote in message
...


tfortee wrote:

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:26:15 -0600, "MnMikew"
wrote:


"Melvin Creep" wrote in message
. com...
At long last our national nightmare is over. I'd like to publicly
thank the Mass. Supreme Court for declaring Wednesday that gays are
entitled to nothing less than marriage and that Vermont-style civil
unions will not suffice. This sets the stage for the nation's first
legally sanctioned same-sex weddings by the spring. "The
dissimilitude
between the terms `civil marriage' and `civil union' is not
innocuous;
it is a considered choice of language that reflects a demonstrable
assigning of same-sex, largely homosexual, couples to second-class
status," the justices wrote. On behalf of the shortwave listening
family I salute this very brave and historic decision. Judge Solomom
himself could not have adjudicated this matter more wisely! Sons of
Massachusetts stand proudly and take a bow - a resounding THANK YOU
echoes throughout our land!
Melvin

As usuall the liberal judges overstep their bounds and go against the
masses.


That's the first thing that you have ever written that has made
sense. The rest was uneducated pointless dribble.

An 'educated' person would've used the word 'drivel', rather than
'dribble'.
But you, being an 'uneducated' person, would not have known that.

Maybe he used to play pro basketball?

DeWayne


Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

snip

Islamics were not 9/11 perpetrators, nor did they/do they condone those
actions.

I hope you're right, but who were those that were dancing and celebrating
after 9/11?


There are those that ask why the vast majority of Islamic people don't do
more to stop the rise of terrorists from their midst... I submit that
barring vigilantism, there is little that the public at large can do about
criminal activity. If there were, then there would be no criminal activity
(or considerably less).

I must admit that I am at a complete loss as to how to go about purging
the
likes of Osama bin Laden from society. I don't think that violence or war
is a solution. This has been demonstrated in Great Britain by the fact
that

War nearly always kills mostly the innocent.

DeWayne

In article ,
ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Telamon lid

You are a loser and a waste of time.

Plonk


So, does two plonks make an unplonk?

Only Bryant logic works that way. Did a little more header reading and
this time I may have him better killed off but it relies on my news
server behaving better than it usually does.

But you will probably keep reposting his crap anyway.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Tracy Fort

It's the only thing he has to offer usenet. Plonk...plonk...plonk...

It's his mom's middle name.


OK, that's kind of funny... ;-)

Funny if you are into infantile humor.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

From: "DeWayne"

I hope you're right, but who were those that were dancing and celebrating
after 9/11?

Well, then I guess the answer is to kill them all. How very Christian.

War nearly always kills mostly the innocent.

Yep, that's probably why that Jesus fellow was so against it.

MWB,

"Yeah, to do anything like "banning" someone
they'd have to be a devout Muslim, right ?"

A 'truly' "Devout" Muslim may NOT in-fact 'ban' anyone:
- They may 'choose to act' by simply Praying for the Offender,
Themselves, and their Community.
- They may also, 'choose to act' in many other non-hostile
and non-violent ways to seek Redress and/or Justice.

However, a Fundamentalist Extremist Islam-O-Nazis would do the
'right thing' and either take "The Offender of the Will of Allah"
to a public square or just outside the town or village and
Publicly Stone Them to Death.

Its called everyday life in an Islamic Republic where Shari'ah
(Islamic Religious Law) and Figh (Civil Law) administered only
by the Islamic {Male} Majority.

It is unfortunate that in many Islamic Societies the 'devout'
Muslims live-in-fear of the 'few' but "Powerful" Islam-O-Nazis.

jm2cw ~ RHF
..
..
= = = ojunk (Michael Bryant)
= = = wrote in message ...
From: (Diverd4777)

Banned From The Planet ??

I recall a Person of German Descent who tried the same thing in the 30's &
40's
..
Luckily he did not succeed.

Yeah, to do anything like "banning" someone
they'd have to be a devout Muslim, right ?

..

"RHF" wrote in message
om...

A 'truly' "Devout" Muslim may NOT in-fact 'ban' anyone:
- They may 'choose to act' by simply Praying for the Offender,
Themselves, and their Community.
- They may also, 'choose to act' in many other non-hostile
and non-violent ways to seek Redress and/or Justice.

However, a Fundamentalist Extremist Islam-O-Nazis would do the
'right thing' and either take "The Offender of the Will of Allah"
to a public square or just outside the town or village and
Publicly Stone Them to Death.

Its called everyday life in an Islamic Republic where Shari'ah
(Islamic Religious Law) and Figh (Civil Law) administered only
by the Islamic {Male} Majority.

It is unfortunate that in many Islamic Societies the 'devout'
Muslims live-in-fear of the 'few' but "Powerful" Islam-O-Nazis.


Much as the Jews of two milennia ago lived in fear of the few but powerful
Sadducees and Pharisees...

From: (RHF)

It is unfortunate that in many Islamic Societies the 'devout'
Muslims live-in-fear of the 'few' but "Powerful" Islam-O-Nazis.

It is unfortunate that in many American localities the "devout" citizens of all
faiths live in fear (not hyphenated) of the 'few' but 'powerful'
Christian-O-Nazis.

Like the ones that try thier 'Christian' best to keep newsgroup flames going.
Remember, you are the one with the tent
big enough for EVERYONE. Or is that everyone except fundamentalist Muslims? And
how do you look at a Muslim and immediately recognize where he/she is devout or
fundamentalist?

Are you indicting all practioners of Shari'ah? Isn't that a pretty healthy
percentage of Muslims?