Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

By the way, I spoke with the judge today, not a prosecutor... just to keep
you up to speed.

And the story keeps a changing...

Didn't change at all boy, I never ever mentioned who I spoke to... Did I?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

Once again Bryant, your choice, not mine, I've made my choice, and that is
to file for the PPO.

I STRONGLY suggest you consult an attorney. Don't know how much clearer I
can make that. This is my last and final attempt to hammer the facts of the
matter home to you.

Seems pretty simple to me, simply agree with my reasonable request to not
send me any more emails, or, face the consequences of your actions.

We both know that you've faced the consequences of your actions with the law
in the past, this is at least one time when you yourself have a chance to
alter the outcome.

Your choice! I'll accept one more email from you indicating that you will
send me no further emails, and then we'll drop the issue. Pretty simple!


Well, which is it, Steve? Have you made up your mind or are you extending me
another chance to let you back out of this silliness? You're so clearly
distraught that you seem to reach both conclusions in your post.

I am truly sorry to have worked you up into such a frenzy. Please don't have a
heart attack. I really wouldn't have nearly so much fun if your anxiety caused
you to drop over.

I'll play nice if you stop being such a mean bully. Deal?





Mikey

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

By the way, I spoke with the judge today, not a prosecutor... just to keep
you up to speed.

And the story keeps a changing...

Didn't your 'attorney' explain that to you boy? Why on earth would a prosecutor
get involved with issuing a PPO? A prosecutor might indeed become involved if
the guidelines of the PPO were violated, but the issuance of a PPO in and of
itself does not involve a prosecutor, but merely the judge who looks at the
individuals petition to the court for the PPO... and either grants it, or
denies it, based upon the facts presented.

It's obvious to me that you have little or no knowledge of the law, other than
your pot bust!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Once again Bryant, your choice, not mine, I've made my choice, and that is
to file for the PPO.

I STRONGLY suggest you consult an attorney. Don't know how much clearer I
can make that. This is my last and final attempt to hammer the facts of the
matter home to you.

Seems pretty simple to me, simply agree with my reasonable request to not
send me any more emails, or, face the consequences of your actions.

We both know that you've faced the consequences of your actions with the law
in the past, this is at least one time when you yourself have a chance to
alter the outcome.

Your choice! I'll accept one more email from you indicating that you will
send me no further emails, and then we'll drop the issue. Pretty simple!


Well, which is it, Steve? Have you made up your mind or are you extending me
another chance to let you back out of this silliness? You're so clearly
distraught that you seem to reach both conclusions in your post.

I am truly sorry to have worked you up into such a frenzy. Please don't have a
heart attack. I really wouldn't have nearly so much fun if your anxiety caused
you to drop over.

I'll play nice if you stop being such a mean bully. Deal?

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.

That is a reasonable and lawful request.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B



Mikey

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Once again Bryant, your choice, not mine, I've made my choice, and that is
to file for the PPO.

I STRONGLY suggest you consult an attorney. Don't know how much clearer I
can make that. This is my last and final attempt to hammer the facts of the
matter home to you.

Seems pretty simple to me, simply agree with my reasonable request to not
send me any more emails, or, face the consequences of your actions.

We both know that you've faced the consequences of your actions with the law
in the past, this is at least one time when you yourself have a chance to
alter the outcome.

Your choice! I'll accept one more email from you indicating that you will
send me no further emails, and then we'll drop the issue. Pretty simple!


Well, which is it, Steve? Have you made up your mind or are you extending me
another chance to let you back out of this silliness?

Let me back out? Hardly, you are the one who will face the consequences, not me. I
have no reason to back out, should you decline my request. I know perfectly well
where I stand with regards to the law.

You're so clearly
distraught that you seem to reach both conclusions in your post.

I am truly sorry to have worked you up into such a frenzy. Please don't have a
heart attack. I really wouldn't have nearly so much fun if your anxiety caused
you to drop over.

I'll play nice if you stop being such a mean bully. Deal?

Mikey

Mikey thinks I'm kidding... someone should slap him up side the head and
inform
him that I'm not. Maybe his 'attorney' will enlighten him.

What is 'this one' all about Steve? I must have missed something or I haven't
got to the thread where it all started. {?}

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Once again Bryant, your choice, not mine, I've made my choice, and that is
to file for the PPO.

I STRONGLY suggest you consult an attorney. Don't know how much clearer I
can make that. This is my last and final attempt to hammer the facts of the
matter home to you.

Seems pretty simple to me, simply agree with my reasonable request to not
send me any more emails, or, face the consequences of your actions.

We both know that you've faced the consequences of your actions with the law
in the past, this is at least one time when you yourself have a chance to
alter the outcome.

Your choice! I'll accept one more email from you indicating that you will
send me no further emails, and then we'll drop the issue. Pretty simple!


Well, which is it, Steve? Have you made up your mind or are you extending me
another chance to let you back out of this silliness? You're so clearly
distraught that you seem to reach both conclusions in your post.

I am truly sorry to have worked you up into such a frenzy.

No frenzy at all boy, I've simply and repeatedly made a simple request of you.

Please don't have a
heart attack.

No heart attacks here. Quite frankly I relish the thought of you getting
acquainted with the court system again, but that's your choice!

I really wouldn't have nearly so much fun if your anxiety caused
you to drop over.

I'll play nice if you stop being such a mean bully. Deal?

I'm no longer playing. The recess bell rang long ago boy.



Mikey

From: (Dxluver)

What is 'this one' all about Steve? I must have missed something or I
haven't
got to the thread where it all started. {?}

Steve's trying to prove to all of us that he's not all worked up!

From: N8KDV

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll
state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL
ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the
matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.


Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should
enjoy this comedy!

Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in the
first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second?

I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly
functioning!

;-)

Dxluver wrote:

Mikey thinks I'm kidding... someone should slap him up side the head and
inform
him that I'm not. Maybe his 'attorney' will enlighten him.

What is 'this one' all about Steve? I must have missed something or I haven't
got to the thread where it all started. {?}

This all stems from the fact that Bryant likes to send me an email response at the
same time he responds to one of my posts here in rec.radio.shortwave (Reply All).

I have indicated to him in the past that I do not wish to receive emails from him,
and he has declined to comply with my lawful reasonable request. Therefore, as
I've indicated to him, I will file for a PPO (Personal Protection Order) with the
Circuit Court here in Michigan which will order him to cease sending me those
emails.

Bryant seems to think that can't be done, however, I spoke with one of the judges
of the Circuit Court this afternoon and I was told that the sending of the emails
falls under stalking and harassment, and that a PPO can indeed be issued, since I
have requested that he not send them, and yet he continues to do so.

Seems like a reasonable request to me? However, Bryant thinks I'm being a bully by
making that request of him!

As I understand it, once the PPO is issued, Bryant won't even be able to respond
to any of my posts via email or here in rec.radio.shortwave, as the Court (and
myself at that point) would also consider that to be stalking and harassment.

I'm trying to give the boy an out here by simply agreeing to not send me any more
emails, however, he's being a bit hardheaded!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B