From: N8KDV

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll
state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL
ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the
matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.


Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should
enjoy this comedy!

Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in
the
first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second?

I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly
functioning!

;-)


Ok, Steve, you got me. I don't want the coppers busting down my door. But I
need an answer. You say want an email to back down and then you say you'll got
the big bad judge if I do. You're just so damn trixey. What should I do....

snicker, snicker

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll
state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL
ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the
matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.


Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should
enjoy this comedy!

Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in the
first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second?

Try and read it again boy, I'm sure it will become clear to you!



I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly
functioning!

It's your mind boy, as I said, read it again, it's pretty clear! But let me try
once again. All you have to do to resolve this is send me an email stating that
you will no longer send me emails.

If you do email me after stating that you will not do it again, I will be forced
at that time to take up the matter with the Circuit Court. Clear enough boy?



;-)

On 06 Feb 2004 04:48:25 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: N8KDV

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll
state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL
ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the
matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.


Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should
enjoy this comedy!

Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in
the
first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second?

I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly
functioning!

;-)


Ok, Steve, you got me. I don't want the coppers busting down my door. But I
need an answer. You say want an email to back down and then you say you'll got
the big bad judge if I do. You're just so damn trixey. What should I do....

snicker, snicker
Quit stealing my snickers!

Tracy

From: Tracy Fort

Quit stealing my snickers!

Tracy

You can have them back! Too many nuts... ;-o
Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

You obviously don't read very well Bryant, as I've stated before, and I'll
state
here again, simply send me an email indicating to me that YOU WILL NOT EMAIL
ME
AGAIN, and I will consider the matter closed.

However, if you should email me again I will again be forced to pursue the
matter
with the Circuit Court here in Michigan.


Is anyone else reading this stuff? It's too good to be real. The court should
enjoy this comedy!

Steve, Mr. Maximum Intellect, please explain how I can meet the request in
the
first paragraph without violating the edict established in the second?

I am assuming that you are simply so upset that your mind is not correctly
functioning!

;-)


Ok, Steve, you got me. I don't want the coppers busting down my door. But I
need an answer. You say want an email to back down and then you say you'll got
the big bad judge if I do. You're just so damn trixey. What should I do....

snicker, snicker

You know exactly what I mean boy. Your spelling is starting to suffer! You need
some sleep!

On 06 Feb 2004 04:53:33 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: Tracy Fort

Quit stealing my snickers!

Tracy

You can have them back! Too many nuts... ;-o
Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

You got a problem with nuts?

Tracy

From: Tracy Fort

You got a problem with nuts?

Only rotten ones, like yourself.....

DID HE SIGN A RECEIPT???

N8KDV wrote:

Dxluver wrote:


Mikey thinks I'm kidding... someone should slap him up side the head and
inform
him that I'm not. Maybe his 'attorney' will enlighten him.

What is 'this one' all about Steve? I must have missed something or I haven't
got to the thread where it all started. {?}


This all stems from the fact that Bryant likes to send me an email response at the
same time he responds to one of my posts here in rec.radio.shortwave (Reply All).

I have indicated to him in the past that I do not wish to receive emails from him,
and he has declined to comply with my lawful reasonable request. Therefore, as
I've indicated to him, I will file for a PPO (Personal Protection Order) with the
Circuit Court here in Michigan which will order him to cease sending me those
emails.

Bryant seems to think that can't be done, however, I spoke with one of the judges
of the Circuit Court this afternoon and I was told that the sending of the emails
falls under stalking and harassment, and that a PPO can indeed be issued, since I
have requested that he not send them, and yet he continues to do so.

Seems like a reasonable request to me? However, Bryant thinks I'm being a bully by
making that request of him!

As I understand it, once the PPO is issued, Bryant won't even be able to respond
to any of my posts via email or here in rec.radio.shortwave, as the Court (and
myself at that point) would also consider that to be stalking and harassment.

I'm trying to give the boy an out here by simply agreeing to not send me any more
emails, however, he's being a bit hardheaded!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

On 06 Feb 2004 04:58:26 GMT, ojunk (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: Tracy Fort

You got a problem with nuts?

Only rotten ones, like yourself.....



You should give up those Horses up there in Kentucky and go back to
women. I'm sure the horses would love to see you quit playing with
their peni.....never mind!

Tracy

Just block his Email - done - see I saved everyone a lot of trouble.
I'm good at that. Maybe I should mediate for a living ... naw.

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:39:02 -0500, N8KDV
wrote:



Dxluver wrote:

Mikey thinks I'm kidding... someone should slap him up side the head and
inform
him that I'm not. Maybe his 'attorney' will enlighten him.

What is 'this one' all about Steve? I must have missed something or I haven't
got to the thread where it all started. {?}

This all stems from the fact that Bryant likes to send me an email response at the
same time he responds to one of my posts here in rec.radio.shortwave (Reply All).

I have indicated to him in the past that I do not wish to receive emails from him,
and he has declined to comply with my lawful reasonable request. Therefore, as
I've indicated to him, I will file for a PPO (Personal Protection Order) with the
Circuit Court here in Michigan which will order him to cease sending me those
emails.

Bryant seems to think that can't be done, however, I spoke with one of the judges
of the Circuit Court this afternoon and I was told that the sending of the emails
falls under stalking and harassment, and that a PPO can indeed be issued, since I
have requested that he not send them, and yet he continues to do so.

Seems like a reasonable request to me? However, Bryant thinks I'm being a bully by
making that request of him!

As I understand it, once the PPO is issued, Bryant won't even be able to respond
to any of my posts via email or here in rec.radio.shortwave, as the Court (and
myself at that point) would also consider that to be stalking and harassment.

I'm trying to give the boy an out here by simply agreeing to not send me any more
emails, however, he's being a bit hardheaded!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B