hello mwb, Hello Mwb. HELLO MWB !

You Post a Message with My Name "RHF" in the Subject Line and
you Act Upset that I Reply. Once Again... H E L L O !

My Daddy used to tell me that Son; Your Mother and I can't be
with You Always; So the Only Advice I have for You is this
simple Question to Ask Yourself: "Am I Doing Right By My Self ?"

MWB - You Are Still In Denial - You are Still Blaming others for
what happen to you. Instead of Taking Personal Responsibility
for you own actions. [Those Evil Republican Code Words.]
The Result is that your are still living (stuck-in) the past.
{Emotionally Tied to the Past.}

What you do not seem to be able to see MWB is that here is "Your
Side of the Story" and "There are the Material Facts" that resulted
in your having to Pay a Fine for your Personal Activities.

MWB - IF you can simply view this as: I got a Traffic Ticket for
XYZ; Paid My Fine and Now Its Time To "Move-On". You would be a
lot better off in your current life. You are simply Mentally
Handicapping Yourself by your current way of Thinking and
dwelling on this past event.

Yes, inspite of your de-criminalized past there is still room
in that Great Tent of Americana for you MWB.

I Am Not Being Morally Superior MWB.
But you seem to think that any one who disagrees with you or
has a different view point then you is acting uppity or
disrespecting you by not agreeing with you.
Be "YOU" MWB -and- I Will Remain "ME" [RHF]

* But when it comes to the Law there are Questions
and the Answers a Yes -or- No [.]

* When It comes to the Law there are No Rights or Wrongs:
There are simply Material Facts from which to Draw a Conclusion.

* The Criminal Justice $ystem has less to do with Crime and
Justice and more to do with the Nature of the $ystem:
Yes - I Do Spell the Word "$ystem" with a Dollar Sign [.]


ir... ~ RHF
= = = I Remain... RHF.
..
..
= = = ojunk (Michael Bryant)
= = = wrote in message ...
From: (Dxluver)

You are saying you were not arrested?

Nope I wasn't arrested. Given a paper citation. The WSU Signpost was a
student-run Newspaper that didn't do a very good job of checking their facts.

But the important question is now that Steve and I seem to be deaccelerating
why are you good Christians trying your best to keep the flames going?

Look this has been discussed repeatedly multiple times. Thanks, RHF, ffor your
URLs I think they showed most people exactly what I was saying.

RHF, you once told me that you weren't into being morally superior and that
your "tent" was big enough for everyone. Live up to your words.

DXLuver, why don't you go back to waiting for the Soviet Union to re-form and
lead us into armageddon.

From: (RHF)

MWB - IF you can simply view this as: I got a Traffic Ticket for
XYZ; Paid My Fine and Now Its Time To "Move-On". You would be a
lot better off in your current life.

Look, old man, that is exactly my view. But people like you and N8KDV trot it
as argument fodder when you can't keep up in an argument. You are the one that
appears to be fixated on it. Stop. I don't want or need your spin.

In terms of Christianity, I consider you a hypocrite. You want to talk love and
inclusiveness while sitting yourself up as the judge, arbitor, and wise old
sage. Baloney. You're just an opionated old man. An one that can't spell or use
grammar very effectively. Look at what you wrote! I have no expectations of
perfect grammar or spelling but reading your posts takes real effort.

In conclusion, I'm not the one dwelling on my past. You and N8KDV do that for
me. And no amount of spin can change.

And I'll let you in on another secret: YOU have no idea what took place in my
past. I'm not ashamed of what I did. I'd do it again, though I'm sure you'll
misinterpret that to fit your homespun homilies.

Waiting for Ozarow to chastise me for not using proper British spelling.

I don't want to plonk you but you seem committed to making me consider that
option. Please just go away.

Bryant

I thought I had lost all respect for Bryant when he began constantly
resorting to rudeness, insults, and name-calling to defend his liberal views
(and called it debate).

Amazingly, he has managed to even lower THAT opinion.

If anything good has come from this, it is that most universities will not
want him as part of their faculty, thus minimizing his influence with young
people.

-- Stinger

"RHF" wrote in message
om...
hello mwb, Hello Mwb. HELLO MWB !

You Post a Message with My Name "RHF" in the Subject Line and
you Act Upset that I Reply. Once Again... H E L L O !

My Daddy used to tell me that Son; Your Mother and I can't be
with You Always; So the Only Advice I have for You is this
simple Question to Ask Yourself: "Am I Doing Right By My Self ?"

MWB - You Are Still In Denial - You are Still Blaming others for
what happen to you. Instead of Taking Personal Responsibility
for you own actions. [Those Evil Republican Code Words.]
The Result is that your are still living (stuck-in) the past.
{Emotionally Tied to the Past.}

What you do not seem to be able to see MWB is that here is "Your
Side of the Story" and "There are the Material Facts" that resulted
in your having to Pay a Fine for your Personal Activities.

MWB - IF you can simply view this as: I got a Traffic Ticket for
XYZ; Paid My Fine and Now Its Time To "Move-On". You would be a
lot better off in your current life. You are simply Mentally
Handicapping Yourself by your current way of Thinking and
dwelling on this past event.

Yes, inspite of your de-criminalized past there is still room
in that Great Tent of Americana for you MWB.

I Am Not Being Morally Superior MWB.
But you seem to think that any one who disagrees with you or
has a different view point then you is acting uppity or
disrespecting you by not agreeing with you.
Be "YOU" MWB -and- I Will Remain "ME" [RHF]

* But when it comes to the Law there are Questions
and the Answers a Yes -or- No [.]

* When It comes to the Law there are No Rights or Wrongs:
There are simply Material Facts from which to Draw a Conclusion.

* The Criminal Justice $ystem has less to do with Crime and
Justice and more to do with the Nature of the $ystem:
Yes - I Do Spell the Word "$ystem" with a Dollar Sign [.]


ir... ~ RHF
= = = I Remain... RHF.
.
.
= = = ojunk (Michael Bryant)
= = = wrote in message
...
From: (Dxluver)

You are saying you were not arrested?

Nope I wasn't arrested. Given a paper citation. The WSU Signpost was a
student-run Newspaper that didn't do a very good job of checking their
facts.

But the important question is now that Steve and I seem to be
deaccelerating
why are you good Christians trying your best to keep the flames going?

Look this has been discussed repeatedly multiple times. Thanks, RHF,
ffor your
URLs I think they showed most people exactly what I was saying.

RHF, you once told me that you weren't into being morally superior and
that
your "tent" was big enough for everyone. Live up to your words.

DXLuver, why don't you go back to waiting for the Soviet Union to
re-form and
lead us into armageddon.

MWB - You Would Honor Me With A "PLONK" ~ RHF
{ And Please NO More Posting To My Private eMail Box. }
..
..
= = = ojunk (Michael Bryant)
= = = wrote in message ...
From: (RHF)

MWB - IF you can simply view this as: I got a Traffic Ticket for
XYZ; Paid My Fine and Now Its Time To "Move-On". You would be a
lot better off in your current life.

Look, old man, that is exactly my view. But people like you and N8KDV trot it
as argument fodder when you can't keep up in an argument. You are the one that
appears to be fixated on it. Stop. I don't want or need your spin.

In terms of Christianity, I consider you a hypocrite. You want to talk love and
inclusiveness while sitting yourself up as the judge, arbitor, and wise old
sage. Baloney. You're just an opionated old man. An one that can't spell or use
grammar very effectively. Look at what you wrote! I have no expectations of
perfect grammar or spelling but reading your posts takes real effort.

In conclusion, I'm not the one dwelling on my past. You and N8KDV do that for
me. And no amount of spin can change.

And I'll let you in on another secret: YOU have no idea what took place in my
past. I'm not ashamed of what I did. I'd do it again, though I'm sure you'll
misinterpret that to fit your homespun homilies.

Waiting for Ozarow to chastise me for not using proper British spelling.

I don't want to plonk you but you seem committed to making me consider that
option. Please just go away.

Bryant

..

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:39:09 +0000, Michael Bryant wrote:



Waiting for Ozarow to chastise me for not using proper British spelling.

Bryant,

I chimed in on that other thread about your spelling and
grammar because you were being a bit arrogant and I thought
it was funny that you did it in a non-literate sentence.
For what it's worth, in this thread which seems to have started over a lot
of bull**** piling on about your past (I'm not even sure, I can't
even read most of the crap in the thread), I'm on
your side - it is totally assholish and hypocritical to
bring any of that stuff up. There are a lot of things you say
that I don't like, and I certainly don't like the way you
say it, but all the stuff these guys are writing about what happened
back then is beneath contempt.

Oz

In article ,
N8KDV wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (Dxluver)

You are saying you were not arrested?

Nope I wasn't arrested. Given a paper citation. The WSU Signpost
was a student-run Newspaper that didn't do a very good job of
checking their facts.

You said that the news articles were near "word for word" identical in
all three papers. That would make all three sources equally wrong.

Perhaps someone should call the authorities in Utah to see whether
they would consider you to have been arrested?

But the important question is now that Steve and I seem to be
deaccelerating why are you good Christians trying your best to keep
the flames going?

You never had to *accelerate* at all Bryant! All you had to do was
comply with my *reasonable and lawful request* to stop sending me
emails, and indicate to me that you would comply with that request!
It was just that simple!

Why do you now choose to bring *religion* into the matter? Is that a
*debate* tactic?


Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm




--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Larry Ozarow wrote:

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:39:09 +0000, Michael Bryant wrote:



Waiting for Ozarow to chastise me for not using proper British spelling.

Bryant,

I chimed in on that other thread about your spelling and grammar
because you were being a bit arrogant and I thought it was funny that
you did it in a non-literate sentence. For what it's worth, in this
thread which seems to have started over a lot of bull**** piling on
about your past (I'm not even sure, I can't even read most of the
crap in the thread), I'm on your side - it is totally assholish and
hypocritical to bring any of that stuff up. There are a lot of
things you say that I don't like, and I certainly don't like the way
you say it, but all the stuff these guys are writing about what
happened back then is beneath contempt.


I'm on Mike¹s side too. Let's start a fan club.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

From: "Stinger"

I thought I had lost all respect for Bryant when he began constantly
resorting to rudeness, insults, and name-calling to defend his liberal views
(and called it debate).

I have called anything that transpires in this NG "debate."


Amazingly, he has managed to even lower THAT opinion.

Given the politcal expressions emanating from you, I am delighted to be held in
low opinion by you!



If anything good has come from this, it is that most universities will not
want him as part of their faculty, thus minimizing his influence with young
people.


Too late. But you don't have to worry. It's easy to figure out that you'll
never see the inside of a university.... ;-)

Bryant

MWB - You Would Honor Me With A "PLONK" ~ RHF
{ And Please NO More Posting To My Private eMail Box. }

Then stop responding to my posts with your eye poetry. And no one can post to
your current address, right? Another "staged" complaint.

No plonk for you, RHF. Thanks for helping me understand the hidden objective
behind your verbal spewing.

Michael Bryant wrote:

MWB - You Would Honor Me With A "PLONK" ~ RHF
{ And Please NO More Posting To My Private eMail Box. }

Then stop responding to my posts with your eye poetry. And no one can post to
your current address, right? Another "staged" complaint.

Well Bryant, YOU can't post to his address if he makes a request that you do not
do so.

We've been down this road already have we not?

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm