In article ,
George Orwell wrote:

Mobil/Exxon posted the largest profit in history, last quarter!


Good, I own stock. Why are you ****ed at success? Loser.

From: nobody

Good, I own stock. Why are you ****ed at success? Loser.

Well, if that's your sense of corporate ethics, don't forget to buy stock in
Halliburton. But, wait, Bush is making them return some of the profits they
made for selling gas at $2.80 a gallon in Baghdad. So, even the mighty "Shrub"
recognizes that there is indeed a line where profits become gouging, right?

At least from the political perspective of an upcoming election...


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: nobody

Good, I own stock. Why are you ****ed at success? Loser.

Well, if that's your sense of corporate ethics, don't forget to buy stock in
Halliburton. But, wait, Bush is making them return some of the profits they
made for selling gas at $2.80 a gallon in Baghdad. So, even the mighty "Shrub"
recognizes that there is indeed a line where profits become gouging, right?

$2.80? Better check your facts. Halliburton's KBR subsidiary charged the Army
between $1.62 and $1.70 per gallon. While the average price in the Middle East
is/was around $.71 per gallon, Halliburton charged that price for 'guaranteed'
delivery. Not to bad considering the logistics of doing so in a war zone.

Could you do better? No? I thought not.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

N8KDV schrieb:



$2.80? Better check your facts. Halliburton's KBR subsidiary charged the Army
between $1.62 and $1.70 per gallon. While the average price in the Middle East
is/was around $.71 per gallon, Halliburton charged that price for 'guaranteed'
delivery. Not to bad considering the logistics of doing so in a war zone.


You're all living in cardrivers heaven....
In europe gasoline 91 octane sells for about US$ 5(!) per gallon. That
is a bit more than 1EUR per litre. At laest it is a want from politics
as there is at least 2/3 of taxes in that selling price. And too bad
they want to go up to 2.50EUR per litre(!) in the next few years :-(((
So 1(!) gallon will cost about US$ 9.50 in near future.....
reminder: 1 gallon is 3.8litre

Volker

Can you imagine the nerve of the guy driving a gasoline tanker in a war
zone!

-- Stinger

"N8KDV" wrote in message
...


Michael Bryant wrote:

From: nobody

Good, I own stock. Why are you ****ed at success? Loser.

Well, if that's your sense of corporate ethics, don't forget to buy
stock in
Halliburton. But, wait, Bush is making them return some of the profits
they
made for selling gas at $2.80 a gallon in Baghdad. So, even the mighty
"Shrub"
recognizes that there is indeed a line where profits become gouging,
right?

$2.80? Better check your facts. Halliburton's KBR subsidiary charged the
Army
between $1.62 and $1.70 per gallon. While the average price in the Middle
East
is/was around $.71 per gallon, Halliburton charged that price for
'guaranteed'
delivery. Not to bad considering the logistics of doing so in a war zone.

Could you do better? No? I thought not.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

Stinger schrieb:

Can you imagine the nerve of the guy driving a gasoline tanker in a war
zone!

No, because he has to have no nerve.... ;-)

odo

Attention to "nobody": Success as you call it is not against the law,
but "financial intercourse" is.

I can see why you bought their stock.

Boycott is a perfect program to get their attention, but it takes more
than a few, it takes millions of Americans to join. I understand that
there are over 300k already involved in just 3 days from an email I
received two days ago. As requested I sent the email I received out to
everyone on my email list.

N8KDV wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: nobody

Good, I own stock. Why are you ****ed at success? Loser.

Well, if that's your sense of corporate ethics, don't forget to buy stock in
Halliburton. But, wait, Bush is making them return some of the profits they
made for selling gas at $2.80 a gallon in Baghdad. So, even the mighty "Shrub"
recognizes that there is indeed a line where profits become gouging, right?

$2.80? Better check your facts. Halliburton's KBR subsidiary charged the Army
between $1.62 and $1.70 per gallon. While the average price in the Middle East
is/was around $.71 per gallon, Halliburton charged that price for 'guaranteed'
delivery. Not to bad considering the logistics of doing so in a war zone.

Could you do better? No? I thought not.

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

In article , wrote:

Attention to "nobody": Success as you call it is not against the law,
but "financial intercourse" is.


Care to cite that law?



I can see why you bought their stock.

Boycott is a perfect program to get their attention, but it takes more
than a few, it takes millions of Americans to join.


Ya could try ****ing up a rope or shoveling **** against the tide too,
you'll have just as much luck. Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

"nobody" wrote in message
...
In article , wrote:

Attention to "nobody": Success as you call it is not against the law,
but "financial intercourse" is.


Care to cite that law?


There are laws (federal and state) against price gouging. These laws were
used to prosecute some vendors in the short term after the 9/11 attacks,
when some stations were selling gasoline for $5 a gallon. They were also
used (and well I remember) during the Arab Oil Embargo in the 70's when gas
stations everywhere raised prices from 30 cents a gallon to in some cases
over $1 a gallon (our stations in Oregon averaged around 79 cents/gallon).
At that time, offenders were made to give out several millions of gallons of
free gasoline (if you weren't around back then, you would never believe the
lines... we could only buy gasoline on alternate days, and the lines were
often 3 to 4 blocks long waiting to get in (and the gas was being rationed,
as we later found, not by the govt., but by the oil companies.. those lines
were nothing compared to the days when the feds required the oil companies
to give away the free gasoline... )

"nobody" wrote in message
...

Yeah, but how does that apply to Exxon-Mobil today. As other posters
have admitted, Exxon-Mobil prices are quite competitive.

Given... but (and not that I'm saying this is the case currently),
competitive doesn't necessarily mean legal. During the aformentioned
embargo, all the oil companys' stations were competitive, but were still
gouging. And all paid the price for it.