Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Need a little help here.
I've been using a G5RV for a number of years for my receivers and it does a very good job. But I notice that many folks here seem to prefer a long wire. Is there much difference between a long wire compared to a G5RV or dipole? And if using a long wi wouldn't a long wire need to be electrically matched to the receiver? Or, by using a G5RV, am I essentially using 1/2 of the antenna as a long wire (the center portion of the antenna jack on the receiver so to speak). Is one antenna really that much better than the other? As I said, I've been using a G5RV for quite a long time and I feel I can pick up just about the same things other folks do; so I don't believe changing to a long wire would dramatically improve my reception. But then again, I might be wrong. Any help would be appreciated in understanding the difference between the antennas a bit better -- if there is any. John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
development of the "Desert Ratt" regenerative receiver design | Homebrew | |||
Long wire antenna | Antenna | |||
RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
Balun | Shortwave | |||
Opinions please G5 against long wire against windom? | Antenna |