Now WHICH administration likes to outsource jobs Brenda Ann??????

************************************************** *********************

Stop NAFTA fast track
People's Weekly World Editorial
13 September 1997

President Clinton, ever ready to do the bidding of his Wall Street patrons, is
now poised to seek a vast expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). But first, Clinton wants renewal of his authority to negotiate the
NAFTA expansion by way of the so-called "fast track." This mode of legislating,
of dubious constitutionality, permits the President to negotiate the terms of a
trade agreement with other countries and then submit it for a quick up or down
vote to the House and Senate barring any amendments.

Clinton, sometimes called "Slick Willy," likes this method of legislating -
rushing bills through before the people can read the fine print. When he rammed
NAFTA through in 1993 over the angry opposition of the labor movement he gushed
promises that NAFTA would generate millions of new high-paying jobs, etc.

Now, the Clinton administration "concedes that it wildly oversold the benefits"
of NAFTA. That is putting it mildly. Clinton lied and lied again."NAFTA's track
record is dismal," the AFL-CIO declares. "Our trade deficit with Canada and
Mexico has quadrupled from $9 billion in 1993 to $39 billion in 1996. This has
cost American workers 420,000 jobs while increasing downward pressure on wages
and eroding worker's bargaining power."

Out of 225,000 applicants, the U.S. Department of Labor has certified about 127,
000 workers from over 1,000 locations (through May 1997) as having lost their
jobs because of NAFTA.

The AFL-CIO statement warns that the Clinton administration has already informed
Congress that it is ready to scrap labor and environmental standards in the
expanded NAFTA to win renewal of Clinton's fast track authority. It is part of
Clinton's gallop to the right. Every poll shows strong majority opposition to
NAFTA. We should demand that Congress block fast track.


--
Ce message a ete poste via la plateforme Web club-Internet.fr
This message has been posted by the Web platform club-Internet.fr

http://forums.club-internet.fr/

So anything Clinton did is OK because ''Clinton did it''?

On 19 Mar 2004 16:08:15 GMT, Bull Owney
wrote:


Now WHICH administration likes to outsource jobs Brenda Ann??????

************************************************* **********************

Stop NAFTA fast track
People's Weekly World Editorial
13 September 1997

President Clinton, ever ready to do the bidding of his Wall Street patrons, is
now poised to seek a vast expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). But first, Clinton wants renewal of his authority to negotiate the
NAFTA expansion by way of the so-called "fast track." This mode of legislating,
of dubious constitutionality, permits the President to negotiate the terms of a
trade agreement with other countries and then submit it for a quick up or down
vote to the House and Senate barring any amendments.

Clinton, sometimes called "Slick Willy," likes this method of legislating -
rushing bills through before the people can read the fine print. When he rammed
NAFTA through in 1993 over the angry opposition of the labor movement he gushed
promises that NAFTA would generate millions of new high-paying jobs, etc.

Now, the Clinton administration "concedes that it wildly oversold the benefits"
of NAFTA. That is putting it mildly. Clinton lied and lied again."NAFTA's track
record is dismal," the AFL-CIO declares. "Our trade deficit with Canada and
Mexico has quadrupled from $9 billion in 1993 to $39 billion in 1996. This has
cost American workers 420,000 jobs while increasing downward pressure on wages
and eroding worker's bargaining power."

Out of 225,000 applicants, the U.S. Department of Labor has certified about 127,
000 workers from over 1,000 locations (through May 1997) as having lost their
jobs because of NAFTA.

The AFL-CIO statement warns that the Clinton administration has already informed
Congress that it is ready to scrap labor and environmental standards in the
expanded NAFTA to win renewal of Clinton's fast track authority. It is part of
Clinton's gallop to the right. Every poll shows strong majority opposition to
NAFTA. We should demand that Congress block fast track.

DAVID,

''Clinton did it''

now, Now. NOW !

What is "IT" ?

Can We Define "IT" ?

.... and IF We Do Define "IT" - Will We Truly Understand "IT" ?

"IT" Is A Dificult Thing - Isn't "IT" ?

Did Not 'Clinton' Warn Us About "IT" ?

As You Can Now Clearly See "IT" Raises Many Questions )


jftfoi ~ RHF
= Just for the Fun of "IT" !
..
..
= = = David wrote in message
= = = . ..
So anything Clinton did is OK because ''Clinton did it''?

On 19 Mar 2004 16:08:15 GMT, Bull Owney
wrote:


Now WHICH administration likes to outsource jobs Brenda Ann??????

************************************************* **********************

Stop NAFTA fast track
People's Weekly World Editorial
13 September 1997

President Clinton, ever ready to do the bidding of his Wall Street patrons, is
now poised to seek a vast expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). But first, Clinton wants renewal of his authority to negotiate the
NAFTA expansion by way of the so-called "fast track." This mode of legislating,
of dubious constitutionality, permits the President to negotiate the terms of a
trade agreement with other countries and then submit it for a quick up or down
vote to the House and Senate barring any amendments.

Clinton, sometimes called "Slick Willy," likes this method of legislating -
rushing bills through before the people can read the fine print. When he rammed
NAFTA through in 1993 over the angry opposition of the labor movement he gushed
promises that NAFTA would generate millions of new high-paying jobs, etc.

Now, the Clinton administration "concedes that it wildly oversold the benefits"
of NAFTA. That is putting it mildly. Clinton lied and lied again."NAFTA's track
record is dismal," the AFL-CIO declares. "Our trade deficit with Canada and
Mexico has quadrupled from $9 billion in 1993 to $39 billion in 1996. This has
cost American workers 420,000 jobs while increasing downward pressure on wages
and eroding worker's bargaining power."

Out of 225,000 applicants, the U.S. Department of Labor has certified about 127,
000 workers from over 1,000 locations (through May 1997) as having lost their
jobs because of NAFTA.

The AFL-CIO statement warns that the Clinton administration has already informed
Congress that it is ready to scrap labor and environmental standards in the
expanded NAFTA to win renewal of Clinton's fast track authority. It is part of
Clinton's gallop to the right. Every poll shows strong majority opposition to
NAFTA. We should demand that Congress block fast track.