"Leonard Martin" wrote in message
...

These guys twist everything, endlessly dishing out innuendo and
meanness
for their partisan listeners. I don't think a liberal version of
this
will work because liberals are generally better-educated and can see
through bull**** better, and lots of us hate it so much that we dont
even like it when it's on our side!


I was going to make an ill-advised, knee-jerk response to this, but I
realize that you do have a point. If you really think about it,
there's plenty of evidence to support your premise, and the world is
certainly a better place for having all of those highly-educated
liberals out there scanning the universe for bull****. After all,
where would we be without all of those liberals who didn't defend
Clinton until their last breath, or who predicted the bloodbath that
Ho Chi Minh would bring about, or who labeled Stalin a mass murderer,
or who realized that we could bring down the Soviet Union with defense
spending, or who helped elect Jimmy Carter, or whose idea of art is
religious icons dunked in urine, or ..... Well, I gotta give it you,
Leonard, you've helped me see the light.

From: "Stinger"

Very likely,
many people listening to some of the more esoteric or fringe radio hosts
(Gallagher, Reagan, etc.) would not necessarily be the same ones that read
William Buckley or even George Will.

Duh. That was hard to guess. Do you think 15% of conservatives (can) read
Buckley or Will?

Liberals do not have a monopoly on
college graduates.


But, you'd probably blast college teachers (more educated than just college) as
being the vanguard of the commie invasion, right?Remember, you do exactly that
later in your post!

Additionally, I think an easy case could be made that elitist dumbasses such
as yourself

Aren't you the same guy that was lambasting liberals as namecallers because
they lack intellect?! Did you have a lobotomy, yesterday?


must rely on an ever-larger, uneducated (or lower-educated) mass
of people to try to elect your socialist dream teams.

So, do you really want to stick to the ASININE claim that liberals appeal more
to the lower rungs of society than do conservatives? Now, that's boggling!

With the help of
their alliance with teachers unions, the Democratic agenda of late has been
to create a populace as uneducated as possible, convinced that they must be
reliant upon the government.

Oh, I get it. Teachers are against education. They want ignorant students. That
must be why Bush's Secretary of Education calls teachers terrorists.


-- Stinger


Stinger, I've generally respected your posts more than most of the so-called
intellectual conservatives on this NG. But this last one was pure,
unadulterated horse****. I'm sorry to see what a negative effect this NG is
having on you.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

Very likely,
many people listening to some of the more esoteric or fringe radio hosts
(Gallagher, Reagan, etc.) would not necessarily be the same ones that read
William Buckley or even George Will.

Duh. That was hard to guess. Do you think 15% of conservatives (can) read
Buckley or Will?

Liberals do not have a monopoly on
college graduates.


But, you'd probably blast college teachers (more educated than just college) as
being the vanguard of the commie invasion, right?Remember, you do exactly that
later in your post!

Additionally, I think an easy case could be made that elitist dumbasses such
as yourself

Aren't you the same guy that was lambasting liberals as namecallers because
they lack intellect?! Did you have a lobotomy, yesterday?


must rely on an ever-larger, uneducated (or lower-educated) mass
of people to try to elect your socialist dream teams.

So, do you really want to stick to the ASININE claim that liberals appeal more
to the lower rungs of society than do conservatives? Now, that's boggling!

With the help of
their alliance with teachers unions, the Democratic agenda of late has been
to create a populace as uneducated as possible, convinced that they must be
reliant upon the government.

Oh, I get it. Teachers are against education. They want ignorant students. That
must be why Bush's Secretary of Education calls teachers terrorists.

Especially the ones who lie about having a PhD!

From: N8KDV

Especially the ones who lie about having a PhD!

Another thread spammed by N8KDV. Plonk him.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Especially the ones who lie about having a PhD!

Another thread spammed by N8KDV. Plonk him.

You just can't stand the truth can you Fat Boy?

You did lie about having the PhD did you not?

From: N8KDV

You did lie about having the PhD did you not?

Repeating for the slow-reading N8KDV:
I thought I had it, as I had completed all the requirements. A technicality and
the departure of one of the professors sitting on my dissertation committee
kept me from being conferred a PhD. I have explained this before. And I really
have completed the coursework for two PhD's one in Rhetoric & Public Address
and another one in Interpersonal Communication. I know all of that leaves me
far behind your Business Admin degree from Grand Valley State.

There was no deliberate lie on my part.

Now, what was that last of employment, Steve? Why are you so afraid to tell us?
Afraid of being caught?

I also have the result of your investigation back. Should I proceed?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"backscatter" wrote in message
...


There is some truth about conservatives having less education. My area
is about 75% conservative while the number of college educated adults is
much less than 50%. Most of the latter are teachers. The others with a
college education usually leave the area because it doesn't have much to
offer them. This may not be the case in other areas of the country but
it's not unusual either.



I don't know if this is true, but let's restate the idea a little. Let's
say liberals are more likely to live in the theoretical world and
conservatives are more likely to live in the practical world. Practical in
the sense of hands on, working with tools, etc.

For every theory, a counter theory can be assembled using different
assumptions. Of course, many theories can be tossed out on logical grounds,
but many will stand fast until confirmed or disproved by actual facts. In
the theoretical world, very little is really settled.

But in the practical world, poor assumptions are often disproven
immediately. If something doesn't work, it doesn't work. Every one who
works with making things or fixing things knows full well that 90% of new
ideas are crud. Ideas proven by the test of time are highly valued.

Frank Dresser

Michael Bryant schrieb:

I also have the result...

Tell this lowlife being 'N8KDV' to take a bath.
Nothing else.

From: Volker Tonn

Michael Bryant schrieb:

I also have the result...

Tell this lowlife being 'N8KDV' to take a bath.
Nothing else.

We'll give Steve a chance to come clean on his own!




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

You did lie about having the PhD did you not?

Repeating for the slow-reading N8KDV:
I thought I had it, as I had completed all the requirements. A technicality and
the departure of one of the professors sitting on my dissertation committee
kept me from being conferred a PhD. I have explained this before. And I really
have completed the coursework for two PhD's one in Rhetoric & Public Address
and another one in Interpersonal Communication. I know all of that leaves me
far behind your Business Admin degree from Grand Valley State.

But you don't have the PhD do you?

There was no deliberate lie on my part.

There sure was! If the degree has not been conferred then you have no business
claiming to be something you are not!


Now, what was that last of employment, Steve? Why are you so afraid to tell us?
Afraid of being caught?

I'm not afraid of anything Fat Boy! Why? Because I haven't lied!

I also have the result of your investigation back. Should I proceed?

Proceed away Fat Boy! Proceed away!

Just don't get into 'the land of actionable slander'!