All:
In the radiointel review of this receiver
http://www.radiointel.com/review-kaitoka105.htm

is this passage:

"Using the plug in antenna wire did help the reception some. With a full size
outside wire antenna, overloading and images were present….that is too much
antenna for the 105."

- Question is: How Much overload is present in just regular " Walking Around"
use
with the Kaito KA105 .
My current " Walking Around " SWR is a Jwin JX - M14.. Overloads like crazy

Any comments out there on the Kaito KA105 & overload??

Thanks

Dan

"Diverd4777" wrote...
- Question is: How Much overload is present in just regular " Walking Around"
use
with the Kaito KA105 .
My current " Walking Around " SWR is a Jwin JX - M14.. Overloads like crazy

Any comments out there on the Kaito KA105 & overload??

Thanks

Dan



Hi Dan.

I've never noticed any problems for general use.

In article .net, "Sanjaya"
writes:



"Diverd4777" wrote...
- Question is: How Much overload is present in just regular " Walking
Around"
use
with the Kaito KA105 .
My current " Walking Around " SWR is a Jwin JX - M14.. Overloads like
crazy

Any comments out there on the Kaito KA105 & overload??

Thanks

Dan



Hi Dan.

I've never noticed any problems for general use.


Hi Sanjaya
Good news, Thanks..!

In article ,
Diverd4777 wrote:
All:
In the radiointel review of this receiver
http://www.radiointel.com/review-kaitoka105.htm

is this passage:

"Using the plug in antenna wire did help the reception some. With a full size
outside wire antenna, overloading and images were present….that is too much
antenna for the 105."

- Question is: How Much overload is present in just regular " Walking Around"
use
with the Kaito KA105 .
My current " Walking Around " SWR is a Jwin JX - M14.. Overloads like crazy

Any comments out there on the Kaito KA105 & overload??

Thanks

In strong signal areas it is probably intended that it be used with only
the telescopic whip. Under those conditions I see no evidence of
overloading on SW bands in the RF-congested northeast US.