UJ wrote:

ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message ...
From: (UJ)

In a genuinely competetive free market situation, this new liberal
network wouldn't last more than a few weeks. However, I suspect that
it is being backed financially by some deep pocketed extremists who
have a socialist agenda that is more important to them than financial
profits.

Is anyone else laughing as hard as I am over this nonsense. Rich socialists
throwing away their money??

Rich socialists have been throwing away their money for years. Ever
heard of the Rockefeller Foundation?

Maybe it is possible that wealthy capitlaists and Americans are tired of the
hate being spread daily on the AM frequencies by the right. I'll try to keep
from labeling them as Nazis, but that makes as much sense as calling Democrats
socialists.

It makes perfect sense to call Democrats socialists.There is a group
in the US Congress called the Progressive Caucus.Here is a list of
their 54 members, overwhelmingly if not entirely comprised of
Democrats:
http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp .
Presidential candidate and Progressive Caucus Co-Chair Dennis Kucinich
is at the top of the list.
So what, you ask? Well, the Progressive Caucus has close ties to the
Democratic Socialists Of America http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html .
As far as I know, there is no organization called the Republican Nazis
Of America, so your Democrat/Socialist = Republican/Nazi comparison is
way off target.

Most of his crap IS off target!

From: (UJ)

Rich socialists have been throwing away their money for years. Ever
heard of the Rockefeller Foundation?


Wow. The Rockefeller's are socialists? Boggling! Call the newspapers.



It makes perfect sense to call Democrats socialists.There is a group
in the US Congress called the Progressive Caucus.Here is a list of
their 54 members, overwhelmingly if not entirely comprised of
Democrats:
http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp .
Presidential candidate and Progressive Caucus Co-Chair Dennis Kucinich
is at the top of the list.
So what, you ask? Well, the Progressive Caucus has close ties to the
Democratic Socialists Of America http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html .
As far as I know, there is no organization called the Republican Nazis
Of America, so your Democrat/Socialist = Republican/Nazi comparison is
way off target.

So, because a small number of Democrats belong to the Democratic Socialists,
all Dems are socialist? Gee, that reasoning seems suspect. And when I check
your dsasa.org site I don't see anyplace where it says that everyone in the
Progressive caucus is under their wing.

I don't mean to be insulting, but you're going to need better evidence than
this specious connection to prove that all Dems should automatically be labeled
socialists.

That rhetoric is ridiculous.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

Of America, so your Democrat/Socialist = Republican/Nazi comparison is
way off target.

Most of his crap IS off target!

Says the King of Off Topic Crap.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Of America, so your Democrat/Socialist = Republican/Nazi comparison is
way off target.

Most of his crap IS off target!

Says the King of Off Topic Crap.

At least I'm not the King of False Claims, Lies and Fabrications!

LOL!

From: N8KDV

Says the King of Off Topic Crap.

At least I'm not the King of False Claims, Lies and Fabrications!


But you are the King of Unproven Accusations. It's part of your "I'm the
toughest asshole in the world" attitude.

But you are of entertainment value!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Says the King of Off Topic Crap.

At least I'm not the King of False Claims, Lies and Fabrications!


But you are the King of Unproven Accusations. It's part of your "I'm the
toughest asshole in the world" attitude.

What is unproven Fat Boy?

You can't document your PhD can you?

Here is an interesting quote:

"...significant insights into Mr. Bryant, who is, incidentally, NOT a
professor of anything. He is not an associate professor. He is simply an
instructor at Weber..."

Generally one with a PhD would not be merely an 'instructor' would they?

Curious...

UJ wrote:


Rich socialists have been throwing away their money for years. Ever
heard of the Rockefeller Foundation?

The taxation structure is set up in such a way that they aren't
'throwing' anything away. This foundation may well be a very lucrative
write off for another branch of the family's business.

They lose nothing with this 'generosity'.


mike

From: N8KDV

Generally one with a PhD would not be merely an 'instructor' would they?

Many PhDs are classified as instructors. It generally denotes someone who is
hired on a renewable basis versus someone on a tenure track timeline. When on
tenure-track, you have to jump through more publication and standing committee
hoops.

In institutions without tenure systems, all teaching employees are called
instructors.

Obviously, you have little understanding of the structure of most universities.

I'm sure we await your info.

BTW, I've decided to do a little more investigation of you. For $25 some of
these web pages claim they investigate anyone. I think the newsgroup might be
really entertained by your background...

Any DUIs you want to admit to?

How long have you been retired? Remember that little battle where you insisted
you had a job, but posted to the NG pretty much 24/7? I know you say you're
retired, now, but then you were claiming specific employment....

Yes, entertainment potential abounds...




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Generally one with a PhD would not be merely an 'instructor' would they?

Many PhDs are classified as instructors. It generally denotes someone who is
hired on a renewable basis versus someone on a tenure track timeline. When on
tenure-track, you have to jump through more publication and standing committee
hoops.

In institutions without tenure systems, all teaching employees are called
instructors.

Obviously, you have little understanding of the structure of most universities.

I'm sure we await your info.

BTW, I've decided to do a little more investigation of you. For $25 some of
these web pages claim they investigate anyone. I think the newsgroup might be
really entertained by your background...

Any DUIs you want to admit to?

How long have you been retired? Remember that little battle where you insisted
you had a job, but posted to the NG pretty much 24/7? I know you say you're
retired, now, but then you were claiming specific employment....

Yes, entertainment potential abounds...

Have fun!

Guess I could blow a few bucks on a private detective myself! It might indeed prove
interesting!, and to be truthful, I was considering that very thing earlier this
evening.

LOL

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Generally one with a PhD would not be merely an 'instructor' would they?

Many PhDs are classified as instructors. It generally denotes someone who is
hired on a renewable basis versus someone on a tenure track timeline. When on
tenure-track, you have to jump through more publication and standing committee
hoops.

In institutions without tenure systems, all teaching employees are called
instructors.

Obviously, you have little understanding of the structure of most universities.

I'm sure we await your info.

BTW, I've decided to do a little more investigation of you. For $25 some of
these web pages claim they investigate anyone. I think the newsgroup might be
really entertained by your background...

Any DUIs you want to admit to?

How long have you been retired? Remember that little battle where you insisted
you had a job, but posted to the NG pretty much 24/7? I know you say you're
retired, now, but then you were claiming specific employment....

Oh by the way, I've never stated I was retired! I did make a joke about retirement
once, but if you'll read that post you'll quickly determine it was a joke.

Oh heck, what was I thinking! I forgot your level of comprehension was low!