Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The noise you're picking up is obviously radiated and being picked up by
your antenna and not coming thru the power lead, as you have demonstrated by using a separate battery. If you're using the wind-up antenna, it's picking up every single ounce of stray radiated rf energy from all the noise sources in the vehicle. You don't want the antenna to receive anything until it gets outside of the vehicle, so you need shielded coax from the radio to the antenna on the outside. But given the confines of space, you obviously can't throw out 100' of wire, so you're limited to some sort of vertical whip antenna...a 108" steel whip is about as long as you can practically get - but that's still pretty short for a shortwave antenna. So the way antenna manufacturers get around that is to add a loading coil to make the radio "think" the antenna is longer than it actually is...kinda'/sorta' what a hamstick is. BUT - - you get them on a frequency other than where they're designed and they suck! So to cover the shortwave spectrum, you'ld have to get a BUNCH of hamsticks. I'd opt for a 108" steel whip plus a small antenna tuner at the end of the coax by the radio. Now, back to the noise problem... I just picked up an MFJ-1026 "Noise Canceller" that I've experimented with in the shack for both my ham rig as well as general coverage receiver. I bought it as somewhat of a "crapshoot" figuring that I'd throw something new at the noise and if it worked...fine; if not...it was worth a shot. Few things you gotta' know about this noise canceller...it's not like a noise blanker or DSP. The receiving antenna and a 2nd antenna (to pick up the noise) are each plugged into this unit, then a cable goes from it to your receiver. The way it works is to "mix" the signals from the 2 antennas after it changes the electrical phase of the signal from the noise antenna so it is knocked way down. So it does require another antenna (can simply be a piece of wire) and also quite a bit of a learning curve - - you tune this thing - carefully - you don't simply switch it on and off. But it DOES work (at least, in the shack). My next step will be to try it with my hf mobile rig (the infamous Ford Explorer) - I *think* it should work but just haven't tried yet. If so, it should make a dramatic improvement. More, later... /Carl - W5SU Dallas TX |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carl - w5su writes:
snip I'd opt for a 108" steel whip plus a small antenna tuner at the end of the coax by the radio. Where in te heck are these 108" whips? I would like to get it local instead of waiting for mail but all there seems to be are up to 39" whips for CBs. Now, back to the noise problem... snip Out of curiosity, why doesn't this noise show up on my FM/AM that the truck already has? Is it that the noise and its' harmonics lie in the same band as sw? I really need to break out the old college books and refresh my rf theory. Cheers, -- ~/.signature |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Arduengo wrote:
Carl - w5su writes: snip I'd opt for a 108" steel whip plus a small antenna tuner at the end of the coax by the radio. Where in te heck are these 108" whips? I would like to get it local instead of waiting for mail but all there seems to be are up to 39" whips for CBs. Now, back to the noise problem... snip Out of curiosity, why doesn't this noise show up on my FM/AM that the truck already has? Is it that the noise and its' harmonics lie in the same band as sw? I really need to break out the old college books and refresh my rf theory. Cheers, You've partially answered your own question. Harmonics from the ignition and other electical noise do, indeed, fall within certain spectra. Although these spectra may be quite broad. However, AM/FM broadcast signals are often 10 to 100 times stronger than SW signals, largely masking impulse noise from the vehicle two ways One is simply overwhelming it with signal, the other is the often reduced sensitivity on broadcast bands. If, while listening to your favorite AM station, the carrier drops out, you will likely hear these noises. Even some factory FM receivers will render these noises if tuned to interstation dial positions. SW signals being much lower in amplitude, will not offer the same quieting that a city grade signal will, and will permit some of this impulse noise to be heard. You can experiment with this by tuning between stations. Strong broadcast SW station signals will be less encumbered by vehicle noises, than weaker signals which may be covered up entirely. Good sheilding of the antenna transmission line, as well as effective grounding of the receiver, transmission line and antenna mounts will help reduce much of this noise. Make sure the hood and deck lids are making solid contact with their copper grounding tabs. And ascertain whether the antenna transmission line runs through well shielded areas of the frame, isolated from ignition generated electric fields. My 308 had the antenna cable running through the engine bay right across the ignition cables. But then what do the Italians care about my listening habits. It took quite some effort to re route that cable before my Becker 2340 would render quie3t SW. Once measures were applied, the listening was quite good. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Arduengo wrote in message
Out of curiosity, why doesn't this noise show up on my FM/AM that the truck already has? Is it that the noise and its' harmonics lie in the same band as sw? MW is just as prone to noise as SW if you listen to weaker stations. Maybe more so. The reason you don't notice it on that radio, is it has a properly designed and mounted antenna system. MK |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Arduengo wrote:
Carl - w5su writes: snip I'd opt for a 108" steel whip plus a small antenna tuner at the end of the coax by the radio. Where in te heck are these 108" whips? I would like to get it local instead of waiting for mail but all there seems to be are up to 39" whips for CBs. Now, back to the noise problem... snip Out of curiosity, why doesn't this noise show up on my FM/AM that the truck already has? Is it that the noise and its' harmonics lie in the same band as sw? I really need to break out the old college books and refresh my rf theory. You got a good answer from Peter so I'll just add that the receiver matters too for mobile operation. I don't think you told us what receiver you're using in the truck. I use a Drake-SW8 in my car with the external whip antenna on the roof. The SW8 has a metal case which gives better noise shielding than the plastic case of a portable. The sync' detector is also a plus. I connect the audio from the SW8 to the car's stereo system which makes it a lot easier to hear. If you're really serious about shortwave in the truck consider upgrading your receiver too. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
Peter Maus wrote: (snipped) Hi Peter, how's the bike? Well I hope. Goes in for a tuneup this week. Other than that...seriously fine, quiet and smooth. p mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are there ANY scanners that have a remote face option for vehicle installation? | Scanner | |||
Ham radio as a vehicle scanner | Scanner | |||
Scanners in Vehicles - Crazy Talk | Broadcasting | |||
Vehicle installation options | General | |||
Vehicle installation options | General |