Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi folks,
I decided to check out my SW8 a little bit more. I measured the wall wart voltage, and it measured 9.6VDC, so it seemed to be within limits. Just for the heck of it, I checked the ripple voltage with a scope. 4.6V p-p of ripple! I opened up the supply, and discovered that the filter cap had exploded. Just for the record, this isn't a regulated supply; it is merely a transformer, four diodes, and a filter capacitor. I decided to build up my own 10V supply, using a 1000uF cap and a 7810 regulator. I also decided to go with a 3-wire grounded power cord, using single point grounding on the power supply board. Now, all of the buzz on the low end of the MW band is gone, and the sensitivity is much better. Also, the intermittent display backlight problem is gone. Still not quite as sensitive as my other receivers, but not bad. MDS is now down below .1uV, which is pretty ok. Pete |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
Hi folks, I decided to check out my SW8 a little bit more. I measured the wall wart voltage, and it measured 9.6VDC, so it seemed to be within limits. Just for the heck of it, I checked the ripple voltage with a scope. 4.6V p-p of ripple! .. .. Still not quite as sensitive as my other receivers, but not bad. MDS is now down below .1uV, which is pretty ok. Pete Good info Pete. I expected you to get more out of the receiver. My SW8 was a very good radio with a nice mellow sound. It was my favorite receiver for program listening. The filters do seem a little wider than advertised and that may be responsible for the nice sound. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
Hi folks, I decided to check out my SW8 a little bit more. I measured the wall wart voltage, and it measured 9.6VDC, so it seemed to be within limits. Just for the heck of it, I checked the ripple voltage with a scope. 4.6V p-p of ripple! I opened up the supply, and discovered that the filter cap had exploded. Just for the record, this isn't a regulated supply; it is merely a transformer, four diodes, and a filter capacitor. I decided to build up my own 10V supply, using a 1000uF cap and a 7810 regulator. I also decided to go with a 3-wire grounded power cord, using single point grounding on the power supply board. Now, all of the buzz on the low end of the MW band is gone, and the sensitivity is much better. Also, the intermittent display backlight problem is gone. Still not quite as sensitive as my other receivers, but not bad. MDS is now down below .1uV, which is pretty ok. Pete I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree.......................with a 3-wire power cord, MW reception is
improved. I niticed the same characteristic with my Palstar R30. The audio does sound quite good. On another note, I did finish the RF Generator design. This is a DDS based unit that covers from 10kHz to 30MHz, in 1kHz steps. Actually, the final unit will probably tune in finer steps, and it could cover up to 60MHz with this chip (AD9851) . Modulation range will be from 0 to 100%, with a 1kHz tone. Tuning method? Rotary shaft encoder, along with keypad entry. Projected price? I am shooting for the 350 to 400 dollar range. I characterized the prototype over the weekend. 2nd, 3rd, and 4th harmonics measured at -25dBc, -35dBc, and -45dBc respectively. I didn't have the equipment to characterize phase noise, but with this scheme, as used on my DDS, phase noise measured at -124dBc @ 7kHz offset, using an Epson SG636 packaged 30MHz oscillator as a 30MHz reference. Frequency error @ 30MHz was only 3Hz. Stay tuned for further developments. As far at the MW receiver design, all of the RF design is completed....................I am only waiting for the software person to be freed up; when this happens, we can move forward. Right now, I am learning how to use Protel DXP. This is the program that I will be entering the final design information into. A nice program............it does PSpice simulations, microstrip calculations, etc, in addition to the normal schematic capture and board layout functions. Pete "Brian Denley" wrote in message news:d6Jcc.200431$1p.2281442@attbi_s54... Pete KE9OA wrote: Hi folks, I decided to check out my SW8 a little bit more. I measured the wall wart voltage, and it measured 9.6VDC, so it seemed to be within limits. Just for the heck of it, I checked the ripple voltage with a scope. 4.6V p-p of ripple! . . Still not quite as sensitive as my other receivers, but not bad. MDS is now down below .1uV, which is pretty ok. Pete Good info Pete. I expected you to get more out of the receiver. My SW8 was a very good radio with a nice mellow sound. It was my favorite receiver for program listening. The filters do seem a little wider than advertised and that may be responsible for the nice sound. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That sounds like a good thing to do. An improvement you can make to the
standard Drake power supply is to connect .01uF caps across each of the diodes. Also, bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground witha 1uF NP cap. This removes that "flourescent ballast" type of buzzing hash that you may hear on frequencies below 700kHz. If you have the later unit that tunes down to 100kHz (which I wish I had), expect much lower noise performance down there. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... Pete KE9OA wrote: Hi folks, I decided to check out my SW8 a little bit more. I measured the wall wart voltage, and it measured 9.6VDC, so it seemed to be within limits. Just for the heck of it, I checked the ripple voltage with a scope. 4.6V p-p of ripple! I opened up the supply, and discovered that the filter cap had exploded. Just for the record, this isn't a regulated supply; it is merely a transformer, four diodes, and a filter capacitor. I decided to build up my own 10V supply, using a 1000uF cap and a 7810 regulator. I also decided to go with a 3-wire grounded power cord, using single point grounding on the power supply board. Now, all of the buzz on the low end of the MW band is gone, and the sensitivity is much better. Also, the intermittent display backlight problem is gone. Still not quite as sensitive as my other receivers, but not bad. MDS is now down below .1uV, which is pretty ok. Pete I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was just wondering the other day whether I had added those RF bypass
caps' when I was doing the power supply mod'. I think I replaced the discrete OEM diodes with a four diode bridge assembly but I may have forgot the caps'. I'll take a look. BTW- I might be able to take a picture of the power supply mod' with a digital camera if you'd like to see how I located the parts in the chassis. Pete KE9OA wrote: That sounds like a good thing to do. An improvement you can make to the standard Drake power supply is to connect .01uF caps across each of the diodes. Also, bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground witha 1uF NP cap. This removes that "flourescent ballast" type of buzzing hash that you may hear on frequencies below 700kHz. If you have the later unit that tunes down to 100kHz (which I wish I had), expect much lower noise performance down there. Pete Starman wrote: I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be good. Another thing...............the 1uF caps that bypass
each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground are even more effective than the .01s across each diode. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... I was just wondering the other day whether I had added those RF bypass caps' when I was doing the power supply mod'. I think I replaced the discrete OEM diodes with a four diode bridge assembly but I may have forgot the caps'. I'll take a look. BTW- I might be able to take a picture of the power supply mod' with a digital camera if you'd like to see how I located the parts in the chassis. Pete KE9OA wrote: That sounds like a good thing to do. An improvement you can make to the standard Drake power supply is to connect .01uF caps across each of the diodes. Also, bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground witha 1uF NP cap. This removes that "flourescent ballast" type of buzzing hash that you may hear on frequencies below 700kHz. If you have the later unit that tunes down to 100kHz (which I wish I had), expect much lower noise performance down there. Pete Starman wrote: I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did you arrive at the 1uF value for the transformer caps?
Pete KE9OA wrote: That would be good. Another thing...............the 1uF caps that bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground are even more effective than the .01s across each diode. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... I was just wondering the other day whether I had added those RF bypass caps' when I was doing the power supply mod'. I think I replaced the discrete OEM diodes with a four diode bridge assembly but I may have forgot the caps'. I'll take a look. BTW- I might be able to take a picture of the power supply mod' with a digital camera if you'd like to see how I located the parts in the chassis. Pete KE9OA wrote: That sounds like a good thing to do. An improvement you can make to the standard Drake power supply is to connect .01uF caps across each of the diodes. Also, bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground witha 1uF NP cap. This removes that "flourescent ballast" type of buzzing hash that you may hear on frequencies below 700kHz. If you have the later unit that tunes down to 100kHz (which I wish I had), expect much lower noise performance down there. Pete Starman wrote: I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was empirecal......................0.1uf quieted things down pretty well
to around 100kHz, 0.47uF was good down to 50kHz, so I took the next step and went to a 1uF. Even down at 10kHz, all you hear is atmospheric noise................no buzzing from the power supply. If you look at the older TenTec linear supplies, you will see .1uF being used, but these supplies were intended to be used with rigs that only tuned down to 1.8MHz. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... How did you arrive at the 1uF value for the transformer caps? Pete KE9OA wrote: That would be good. Another thing...............the 1uF caps that bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground are even more effective than the .01s across each diode. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... I was just wondering the other day whether I had added those RF bypass caps' when I was doing the power supply mod'. I think I replaced the discrete OEM diodes with a four diode bridge assembly but I may have forgot the caps'. I'll take a look. BTW- I might be able to take a picture of the power supply mod' with a digital camera if you'd like to see how I located the parts in the chassis. Pete KE9OA wrote: That sounds like a good thing to do. An improvement you can make to the standard Drake power supply is to connect .01uF caps across each of the diodes. Also, bypass each leg of the power transformer secondary to ground witha 1uF NP cap. This removes that "flourescent ballast" type of buzzing hash that you may hear on frequencies below 700kHz. If you have the later unit that tunes down to 100kHz (which I wish I had), expect much lower noise performance down there. Pete Starman wrote: I got tired of keeping track of the wallwart for my SW8, which doesn't fit in the Drake carry bag. The remedy was to cut open the wall wart and install the parts in the radio. I had to move the battery holder about an inch to one side to make room for the transformer. It was a tight fit. I also added a receptacle on the back which accepts a standard computer power cord. I probably have the only SW8 with an internal AC power supply. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Boatanchors | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew |