Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So campaign finance reform made it harder for non profit groups to put
their own ads up for broadcast so what's anon profit to do? Buy your own radio or TV station and call it free speech. First Air America next it's the NRA. Wonder who is next. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ap/20040416/ap _on_re_us/nra_news -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TELAMON,
"and call it free speech" So... Is Free Speech ONLY for Liberals and the Left ? Or is 'real' FREE Speech {Freedom to Speak} for Everyone ? http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-04-05-ads-facts_x.htm PoliticalMoneyLine - The Democrats and the 527 BackDoor to Soft Money http://www.tray.com/ http://www.tray.com/fecinfo/ Independent Groups outspend Bush in Campaign Advertising [ Liberal Left Wing Democrat Backed Political Action Committies ] http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new...+ advertising * These Propaganda Groups aren't independent at all and are illegally acting as "a shadow party for the Democrats." * In this fight, the Republicans are joined by nonpartisan campaign watchdog groups who also call for federal action to force the independent groups to comply with the stricter new Campaign Finance Rules that apply to political parties, candidates and political action committees. * The Federal Election Commission expects to rule in May on the claim by the Republican Party and nonpartisan watchdog groups that independent groups who obviously back or oppose a candidate must comply with stricter financial rules. * They are so-called "527s," named for the provision in the Internal Revenue Service's tax code that allows them to operate. * Such 527 groups don't have to comply with the donor-disclosure or contribution-limit requirements that the Federal Election Commission imposes on political candidates, parties or political action committees. * The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan watchdog group, says the Democratic-leaning 527 groups have collected huge donations from a number of unions and wealthy individuals who are barred under the new law from giving as much money directly to the party. El Grito - NRA, NRA. NRA ! http://www.mexconnect.com/MEX/austin/grito0996.html gba ~ RHF .. .. = = = Telamon wrote in message = = = ... So campaign finance reform made it harder for non profit groups to put their own ads up for broadcast so what's anon profit to do? Buy your own radio or TV station and call it free speech. First Air America next it's the NRA. Wonder who is next. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=533&e=5&u=/ap/20040416/ap_on_re_us/nra_news .. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Telamon wrote: First Air America next it's the NRA. Wonder who is next. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ap/20040416/ap _on_re_us/nra_news I think this is an apples and oranges thing. AirAmerica is not a non-profit, though I understand they do not expect to make a profit for a while. -- Larry Weil Lake Wobegone, NH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Weil wrote: In article , Telamon wrote: First Air America next it's the NRA. Wonder who is next. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...5&u=/ap/200404 16/ap _on_re_us/nra_news I think this is an apples and oranges thing. AirAmerica is not a non-profit, though I understand they do not expect to make a profit for a while. Who said anything about profitability? The latest and greatest election law reform prevents the soft money campaigning so to get around this political issues groups are buying radio stations to get their word out since they can not just create political ads and buy air time. Air America claims to eventually be a for profit but I think they are lying about it. It's possible that more groups for profit or not may start their own networks and claim free speech instead of political ads. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|