Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 05:23 AM
N8KDV
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Frank White wrote:

In article ,
says...



Frank White wrote:

In article ,

says...



Frank White wrote:

snip

How's your credibility, btw?

Pretty damn good as far as I know!

How's yours?

Better than yours, I think.

Much better.

Let's cut to the chase here. You said that my
suggestion (that Duyba may have run into the
Air Forces' HUMAN RELIABIILTY PROGRAM and that's
why his military records are incomplete, leading
to charges he was AWOL) was untrue. And basically
you called me a liar.

I responded by provided cites from - and a URL to -
a newspaper article from a fairly reputable paper
saying exactly the same thing as I had. I also
pointed out that even a cursory search of Google
("human reliablity program' air force) indicated
that the program did exist and did functioned as
outlined in the article.

You shut up at that point. But silence isn't
enough. I need you to either specify why you
said my original statement was untrue so that
I can expand my knowledge on this subject and be
able to reach an informed decision. Or I need a
'Oops' from you.

That's it.

All I want.

I don't get either, that tells me all I need to
know regarding the true state of your credibility.
And whether I regard you as a vauled fellow poster
or a troll.

Your move.


I maintain that my credibility is stellar.


I see.

Your refusal puts the lie to your statement,
I'm afraid.

But at least your true nature is clear, now.

****Wad


Listen to me here real good ****Wad...

You are full of ****!

As soon as you can show me that you have the frickin DX credentials that I
have, someday I might just believe you here in this group.

Until then I'd sneak back into whatever stinkin hole you happen to live in and
wait your ****in turn.

I've probably put in more damn time behind the dial tuning around, and turned
in more damn reports to numerous DX publications over the years than your
sorry ****in ass ever thought of doing, and unless you can prove otherwise I
suggest that YOU take your sorry Troll Ass back under the bridge...

And Fat Boy.. the same message is out to you...


  #32   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 06:14 AM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Lawrence H. Bulk) wrote:

"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...
"Lawrence H. Bulk" wrote in message
om...

Don't you miss the good old days when all you had to do to hear the
communist countries was to tune almost anywhere on the dial and hear
about the "US imperialists and their lackeys and running dogs?"

Now it seems all we get is the "Hallelujah" boys ("Hallelujah, send me
money!").

Lawrence


The communists were evangelists with a different theology.

Frank Dresser


The communist countries were on the air with a political agenda which
could be argued (successfully, by our side, as it has turned out).
(Everyone on the air has some agenda; that's why they're on the air.)
(Even I have an agenda!) The communist broadcasters were nice to the
individual listeners, not only never asking for anything (except for
you to listen), but actually sending you gifts and information (some
of it interesting) about their countries.

The so-called "religious" broadcasters have, in my opinion, a very
evil agenda. They espouse a subject which cannot be argued (no one
ever "wins" a religious argument; look how many have been killed in
the attempt) and constantly ask overtly and covertly for MONEY (which
is used for more broadcasts to ask for more money, ad infinitum). Can
you imagine a "religious broadcaster" sending you anything without
asking for something in return? The amount you are asked to send is
always much more than the value of the trinket he sends you! (They are
masters in the art of making people feel guilty if they don't send
money!) Incidentally, if the broadcaster is successful in fooling
enough gullible people to send him their money, he can manage to live
rather a lavish lifestyle, according to his wishes, whether it be
Mercedes-Benzes, BMW's, or young women at his beck-and-call in his
"compound."

Anyone who thinks he or she can "buy" his/her way into "heaven" (or
that these so-called "holy men" will help them do so) is, in my
opinion, very foolish.

Their "shows" aren't even entertaining!


snip

Oh boy! You are going to have to answer to Frank Dresser for that one.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #33   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 06:46 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lawrence H. Bulk" wrote in message
...

Information and education were really what brought down the
communists. I met some individuals from Czechoslovakia and Hungary
during the "cold war" and while they had some potent arguments for the
merits of their system, their failings, once exposed to them and to
their people, outweighed any advantages their system might have
offered. Once their people really knew about the outside world, they
themselves brought down their governments and their failed system.


OK, you're right about that. The propaganda war was central to the success
of the conatainment strategy. I've no doubt that, had the communists
actually been able to entirely close off and censor their countries, they
could have created their own dark age.

"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the
others."

Were the communists a scourge of mankind? Of course they were
(20,000,000 Russians killed by Stalin, among other atrocities), but
their system at least started out with some noble purpose. It just
worked out exactly the opposite of what its founders envisioned.


Well, the Bolsheviks lost their moral superiority, probably sometime before
they decided to murder the Czar's family. But that's the sort of thing true
believers will do.

The Communists, at least at the start, were every bit as much a bunch of
true believers as the Christians during the Dark Ages or as the fanatic
Muslims are now.

But the real evil of true believer orthodoxy is the limitation of people's
choices. Life is unpredictable, even for people we like to think are
"smart". Let a religion or party choose the one true path, and that path
will certainly end up being wrong. But those in charge of the true path
will never blame their doctrine, they'll blame the people.


(This is a poor point here in this argument, but how many Americans
[native, black, etc.] have been killed with the tacit acceptance of
the government?)


I don't know the number. But influential people dehuminized Blacks and
Indians, and the government followed along. The shame is these people
didn't get Constitutional protection from the get go.



The "religious" broacasters have no noble purpose. Just MONEY.


That depends which religious broadcasters you're talking about. There's a
large number of standard theology evangalists on the radio. I think the
style and content of EWTN's broadcasts are somewhat similiar in character
and tone to the some of the calmer old propaganda broadcasts. The Christian
Scientists run their newspaper and ran thier SW station as part of their
religious mission.

However, guys like Brother Stair get most of the attention. And while I
certainly believe Brother Stair is an old reprobate con-artist, I can't
prove it.



That's hardly unique to religion. Fool/Money/Parted.


But these "religious" broadcasters prey (no pun intended) on it. That
is their sole (again, no pun ...) reason for existence.



But people have the choice! And it's never been easier to do the research.



They are very entertaining!!


Maybe they give you a good laugh but I can tell you that, among other
things, they are ruining the shortwave hobby



They are adding to the hobby. The religious broadcasters do sell radios and
add listeners. The programs may feature a different sort of propaganda, but
none of these programs are forcing any of the old line broadcasters to go
away.


(as well as being
inherently evil).



The extreme religious broadcasters may very well be evil. But, again, we
have plenty of choices. A theocracy, or other government of true believers,
would be far more evil.


I have given shortwave receivers as gifts to four
individuals, three youngsters and one adult. I have shown them how to
use these radios, as much as one can do in an hour or two. After a
month or somewhat more, they all had the same complaint: nothing but
"religious" shows on shortwave. Sure I tell them where to tune, but
the complaint persists. No shortwave converts here. Regardless of what
anyone says or even believes, this ("religious" broadcasts), more than
anything else I can think of, is very damaging to the hobby, in my
opinion.


I doubt more than 5% of the public ever cared for SW radio, and the interest
probably peaked in the prewar, preTV era. Is there any reason to think that
your friends would have any interest in SW, no matter what the programming?
After all, Radio Nederland and the BBC, among others, can still be heard
most of the time.

Shortwave broadcasting has gone through several changes in the US. Ignoring
the spark era, the first broadcast era was centered around several domestic
SW stations, most of which simulcast programming from a local station. The
propaganda era started with WW2 and started decling with the fall of the
Berlin Wall. Now we're in the religious broadcaster era. It seems likely
that the small number of listeners from one era would find another one a
disapointment. For example, a prewar listener who liked hearing local radio
content from across the country might very well find the propaganda
broadcasters annoying. Why not, that's not what got him into the hobby!
And the hobby never had much appeal to most people anyway.



These hucksters are not interested in shortwave, or even,
again in my opinion, in true religious beliefs. They only want MONEY!



Maybe. Let's be glad they can't be theocrats.



Sorry for the diatribe, but I really feel strongly about this. I love
listening to the shortwaves for the fun of it (there is still
something magical about it that the internet can never replace) and
for the information it brings about countries that I shall never have
the opportunity to visit. Are the opinions biased? Certainly they are,
but all human opinions are biased in one way or another. At least
these foreign broadcasts have mostly a decent purpose behind them,
whether or not you believe in their system


The purpose wasn't entirely decent, at least in the case of the communist
propaganda broadcasters. I'm sure they employed decent people, but they
were there to put a pleasant face on a bad system. A system which would put
the world into a Dark Age of orthodoxy every bit as stifleing as the ones
the theocrats cooked up.


(I have no use whatsoever
for Fidel Castro, but look at the record: he has outlasted nine US
presidents [and who knows, he may outlast George W. Bush]. If there
have been any assassination attempts by his own people against him, I
am unaware of them. (Of course they wouldn't make that a headline on
Radio Havana!) You and I don't like him, all the refugees don't
either, but maybe some of his people do!



No doubt, and they can go straight to Walterboro if their current bearded
guru kicks the bucket!


I have just as much contempt for the "religious" broadcasters as I do
for Castro.


Castro's worse. He limits choices to keep himself in power, including the
ultimate limitations of the prision and the firing squad.

Brother Stair says "If you don't believe me, stop listening!!"

Again my apologies. You certainly have every right to believe the way
you do (and you don't need my "permission" to do so).


Nothing to apologize for!

Lawrence


Frank Dresser


  #34   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 12:28 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FW - Speaking of Credibility - Your are Incredibility )

Most of the sources on the internet relate back to the Spokane
Spokesman-Review as the primary source of this Incredibility
INFERENCE and INNUENDO with 'relation' to the "Human Reliability
Program" and its application to personal that would have access
to Nuclear Weapons.
http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian...es/000811.html

PLEASE NOTE: All these sources clearly state that there is
NO Documentation {NO Evidence} related to George "W" Bush
and the "Human Reliability Program".
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/break...e=200431401040

The BIG LIE - These so called 'reporters' then go on to IMPLY that
this must be part of a Cover-Up and that in-fact George "W" Bush
must have moved from Texas to Alabama and then went AWOL
to 'avoid' the "Human Reliability Program".

ACTUALLY {A Little Known Fact} : As an F-102 Delta Dagger
Jet "Interceptor" Pilot George "W" Bush
http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/AC/airc...fo/closeup.jpg
Was use to fly routine Air Defense Missions that employed the
use of 'conventional' Rockets and Air-to-Air Missiles to intercept
and knock out of the sky Russian Bombers.
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/resea...ghter/f102.htm
NOTE: The F-102 was NOT equipped with Canons {Guns}.
http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/AC/airc.../info/info.htm

RECORDS: Records do show Bush had a ‘‘secret" security clearance
for Cold War fighter-interceptor missions which routinely carried
Conventional Warheads and Weapons (Non nuclear weapons).
While the type of aircraft that GW Bush flew was 'capable' of
Carrying Nuclear-Tipped Missiles. That was NOT their mission [.]
http://www.strategic-air-command.com...delta_dart.htm

TBL: Non Sequitur = Nuclear Weapons = "Human Reliability Program"
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/f-102.htm

Hello FW - To use your own words: oops, Oops. OOPS !

FW - Nice Try... but you are just trying to Blow Smoke on "4-20" Day.


FW a 'short wave' Good Bye to you ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (Frank White) wrote in message
= = = ...
In article ,
says...

Frank White wrote:


snip

How's your credibility, btw?


Pretty damn good as far as I know!

How's yours?


Better than yours, I think.

Much better.

Let's cut to the chase here. You said that my
suggestion (that Duyba may have run into the
Air Forces' HUMAN RELIABIILTY PROGRAM and that's
why his military records are incomplete, leading
to charges he was AWOL) was untrue. And basically
you called me a liar.

I responded by provided cites from - and a URL to -
a newspaper article from a fairly reputable paper
saying exactly the same thing as I had. I also
pointed out that even a cursory search of Google
("human reliablity program' air force) indicated
that the program did exist and did functioned as
outlined in the article.

You shut up at that point. But silence isn't
enough. I need you to either specify why you
said my original statement was untrue so that
I can expand my knowledge on this subject and be
able to reach an informed decision. Or I need a
'Oops' from you.

That's it.

All I want.

I don't get either, that tells me all I need to
know regarding the true state of your credibility.
And whether I regard you as a vauled fellow poster
or a troll.

Your move.

FW

PS: Shortwave

..
  #38   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 03:43 PM
Lawrence H. Bulk
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Frank,

Well at least we've had an interesting discussion, agreeing on some
points and disagreeing on others. That's what makes the world go
around and as long as no one holds a gun to the other's head, telling
him he must believe "his way," everything is fine.

I, like most people, always hated the communists (and all other
totalitarian regimes) and I believe that the "religious broadcasters,"
while they do not actually hold a gun to your head, use an unarguable
agenda which they use to further themselves and themselves only. (As I
said, there are certainly some legitimate religious broadcasters.)
Plus I still feel they are ruining the hobby. (Sure they sell radios;
big deal. It's just another profit-making venture for them. The more
people who listen to their broadcasts, the more money they can get!)
"Brother" Stair appears to be an obvious "wacko" and sexual pervert.
By the way, DO NOT go to church; if you do, you are definitely and
positively under the influence of Satan. As the "church age" is over,
you should not support your church in any way. Harold Camping says so.
By the way, Harold would like you to send him some money.

I really feel that these people and others like them who constitute
the "now-mainstream" SW "religious" broadcasters are inherently evil.
This is my opinion.

I'm afraid that you and I are going to have to "agree to disagree" on
that point.

However, as I said, it certainly has been interesting. You are
obviously a very reasoned and thoughtful person. We need more (many
more) like you.

Lawrence

P.S. I never actually read Mao's "Little Red Book."
  #39   Report Post  
Old April 21st 04, 10:15 PM
Bill Pike
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have Marx's "The Communist Manifesto" and "Das Kapital";

Ah, "Das Kapital", the 2nd best selling book in history.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FREE! "THE CB EPROM DATA BOOK" OF FREQ. MODS Lou Franklin CB 0 July 1st 04 04:42 AM
FREE! "THE CB EPROM DATA BOOK" OF FREQ. MODS Lou Franklin CB 0 May 25th 04 05:57 AM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 08:48 PM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 08:48 PM
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics Hania Lux Shortwave 0 October 18th 03 01:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017