Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was looking up this info for another individual and as long as I have
it at hand I figured I'd post it here as well. There are 637,404 licensed amateurs in the USA, the licences break down this way: Extra 14.61 % Advanced 12.95 % General 20.84 % Tech Plus 12.16 % Technician 33.85 % Novice 5.59 % No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Where did you get those figures? They seem a little low. Last I read, there were over 730,000 licenses. About 20,000 or so are club, etc licenses. So there are over 700,000 licensed Amateurs in the USA. Doug On Sat, 01 May 2004 16:24:42 -0400, N8KDV wrote: I was looking up this info for another individual and as long as I have it at hand I figured I'd post it here as well. There are 637,404 licensed amateurs in the USA, the licences break down this way: Extra 14.61 % Advanced 12.95 % General 20.84 % Tech Plus 12.16 % Technician 33.85 % Novice 5.59 % No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug wrote: Where did you get those figures? They seem a little low. Last I read, there were over 730,000 licenses. About 20,000 or so are club, etc licenses. So there are over 700,000 licensed Amateurs in the USA. Doug On Sat, 01 May 2004 16:24:42 -0400, N8KDV wrote: I was looking up this info for another individual and as long as I have it at hand I figured I'd post it here as well. There are 637,404 licensed amateurs in the USA, the licences break down this way: Extra 14.61 % Advanced 12.95 % General 20.84 % Tech Plus 12.16 % Technician 33.85 % Novice 5.59 % No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I got those statistics via: http://www.qrz.com/ Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... Doug wrote: No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I think this is in error. Technician Plus licensees are already eligible for a General Class license simply for the asking, since the Technician Plus license (formerly the coded Technician license, was renamed to Technician Plus to differentiate it from the No-Code Technician license, now called simply Technician Class) is/was obtained by taking the written requirements for a General Class license, while retaining the code requirement for only a Novice Class license (5WPM). Under current rules, General Class only requires 5WPM, so the old Technician Plus is basically grandfathered. They have only to show that they had their Technician license before the No-Code Technician licenses began being issued. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Doug wrote: No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I think this is in error. Technician Plus licensees are already eligible for a General Class license simply for the asking, since the Technician Plus license (formerly the coded Technician license, was renamed to Technician Plus to differentiate it from the No-Code Technician license, now called simply Technician Class) is/was obtained by taking the written requirements for a General Class license, while retaining the code requirement for only a Novice Class license (5WPM). Under current rules, General Class only requires 5WPM, so the old Technician Plus is basically grandfathered. They have only to show that they had their Technician license before the No-Code Technician licenses began being issued. I'm not 100% sure of that, as I recall I may have received the part about the license upgrades directly from the FCC, but I don't remember. I'll have to go look it up again. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Doug wrote: No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I think this is in error. Technician Plus licensees are already eligible for a General Class license simply for the asking, since the Technician Plus license (formerly the coded Technician license, was renamed to Technician Plus to differentiate it from the No-Code Technician license, now called simply Technician Class) is/was obtained by taking the written requirements for a General Class license, while retaining the code requirement for only a Novice Class license (5WPM). Under current rules, General Class only requires 5WPM, so the old Technician Plus is basically grandfathered. They have only to show that they had their Technician license before the No-Code Technician licenses began being issued. I'm not 100% sure of that, as I recall I may have received the part about the license upgrades directly from the FCC, but I don't remember. I'll have to go look it up again. Here is some info from ARRL: http://www.arrl.org/news/restructuring/ Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Doug wrote: No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I think this is in error. Technician Plus licensees are already eligible for a General Class license simply for the asking, since the Technician Plus license (formerly the coded Technician license, was renamed to Technician Plus to differentiate it from the No-Code Technician license, now called simply Technician Class) is/was obtained by taking the written requirements for a General Class license, while retaining the code requirement for only a Novice Class license (5WPM). Under current rules, General Class only requires 5WPM, so the old Technician Plus is basically grandfathered. They have only to show that they had their Technician license before the No-Code Technician licenses began being issued. I'm not 100% sure of that, as I recall I may have received the part about the license upgrades directly from the FCC, but I don't remember. I'll have to go look it up again. Here is some info from ARRL: http://www.arrl.org/news/restructuring/ Thanks Steve, but that information is dated. I went in on April 18, 2000 and got my General. All I had to do was prove that I was a Tech Plus licensee who had passed the 5WPM code test (which I did, in 1983). Lot of new General's were born on 4/15/00.. The article you posted to was right in one way... they didn't just automatically send out General tickets to every Tech Plus.. you actually had to go to your local VEC and fill out the paperwork, and offer proof of meeting the code requirement. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Doug wrote: No new Novice, Technician Plus, or Advanced Class amateur service operator licenses will be issued. These licenses, however, may be modified or renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will be converted to Technician Class licenses if renewed. Technician Plus class operator licenses will also be converted to Technician Class when modified to show a vanity call sign. I think this is in error. Technician Plus licensees are already eligible for a General Class license simply for the asking, since the Technician Plus license (formerly the coded Technician license, was renamed to Technician Plus to differentiate it from the No-Code Technician license, now called simply Technician Class) is/was obtained by taking the written requirements for a General Class license, while retaining the code requirement for only a Novice Class license (5WPM). Under current rules, General Class only requires 5WPM, so the old Technician Plus is basically grandfathered. They have only to show that they had their Technician license before the No-Code Technician licenses began being issued. I'm not 100% sure of that, as I recall I may have received the part about the license upgrades directly from the FCC, but I don't remember. I'll have to go look it up again. Here is some info from ARRL: http://www.arrl.org/news/restructuring/ Thanks Steve, but that information is dated. I went in on April 18, 2000 and got my General. All I had to do was prove that I was a Tech Plus licensee who had passed the 5WPM code test (which I did, in 1983). Lot of new General's were born on 4/15/00.. The article you posted to was right in one way... they didn't just automatically send out General tickets to every Tech Plus.. you actually had to go to your local VEC and fill out the paperwork, and offer proof of meeting the code requirement. Yep. But let me say this, everyone should have had to pass the 13 WPM code test for General... Even deaf people can, and could, pass the test. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... Thanks Steve, but that information is dated. I went in on April 18, 2000 and got my General. All I had to do was prove that I was a Tech Plus licensee who had passed the 5WPM code test (which I did, in 1983). Lot of new General's were born on 4/15/00.. The article you posted to was right in one way... they didn't just automatically send out General tickets to every Tech Plus.. you actually had to go to your local VEC and fill out the paperwork, and offer proof of meeting the code requirement. Yep. But let me say this, everyone should have had to pass the 13 WPM code test for General... Even deaf people can, and could, pass the test. My problem was/is that I process all languages the same way.. I translate them into English (in my head) before I can 'read' them. This works more or less for Spanish, but really bytes for Korean (two translations, one from the Hangul alphabet to the Latin one, then from Korean into English) and REALLY slows me down on code.. ![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Thanks Steve, but that information is dated. I went in on April 18, 2000 and got my General. All I had to do was prove that I was a Tech Plus licensee who had passed the 5WPM code test (which I did, in 1983). Lot of new General's were born on 4/15/00.. The article you posted to was right in one way... they didn't just automatically send out General tickets to every Tech Plus.. you actually had to go to your local VEC and fill out the paperwork, and offer proof of meeting the code requirement. Yep. But let me say this, everyone should have had to pass the 13 WPM code test for General... Even deaf people can, and could, pass the test. My problem was/is that I process all languages the same way.. I translate them into English (in my head) before I can 'read' them. This works more or less for Spanish, but really bytes for Korean (two translations, one from the Hangul alphabet to the Latin one, then from Korean into English) and REALLY slows me down on code.. ![]() I always had trouble trying to relate everything to the Algonquin language, or it's derivatives... But that never stopped me. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |