Sir,
You wrote me a note putting me and my ways down the other day. I
answered with a nice long reply expressing my views and the reasons for
my views and I asked you questions that I thought you would answer.

This is the second time I have asked you to answer my reply to your
strong letter of last week, you asked me to email it to you and I did
this but still no reply.

I have considered you a friend over the years and thought you would
take the time to reply. I can understand that my note to you may have
placed you in the corner a little bit BUT you placed me in a corner also.

Please sir, take your time but please answer my questions to the best
of you ability based on your closed mind in regards to Mr. Bush!!

As Always, Your Friend and Supporter,


Burr

On Mon, 10 May 2004 00:21:50 GMT, Burr wrote:

Sir,
You wrote me a note putting me and my ways down the other day. I
answered with a nice long reply expressing my views and the reasons for
my views and I asked you questions that I thought you would answer.

This is the second time I have asked you to answer my reply to your
strong letter of last week, you asked me to email it to you and I did
this but still no reply.

I have considered you a friend over the years and thought you would
take the time to reply. I can understand that my note to you may have
placed you in the corner a little bit BUT you placed me in a corner also.

Please sir, take your time but please answer my questions to the best
of you ability based on your closed mind in regards to Mr. Bush!!

As Always, Your Friend and Supporter,


Burr


Yep...closed mind and open mouth. That's Bryant alright!

Tracy

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote:

snip

Peace, love and understanding,

Peace, love, understanding and BS.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Dear Friend,

You should have been a "Tap Dancer" You have tap-danced all around this
thing with out really say much.

I'm sorry but what was done, was done, because it needed to be done. I
only wish you and many more "Do Righters" had to live in the area before
you passed judgment.

I support what was done, the way it was done and know that it will be
done in the future the same way, Cause that's the way it is done.

Would you have had us beat them to death, would you have had us drug
them tell we blew there mind. Remember, set an example with one and the
rest will fall in line.

War, life and death ain't pretty.


As Always your friend (at times)

Burr

From: Burr

War, life and death ain't pretty.

Burr, please answer the questions I posed in the reply to your earlier post.
One-line cliches just ain't hacking it.

I think the questions were serious. I don't think they danced around what you
said. I was caredful to go paragraphbyparagraph, carefully dissecting what you
said.

Please have enough respect to respond, even if it takes a couple of days.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

On 10 May 2004 12:00:32 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: Burr

War, life and death ain't pretty.

Burr, please answer the questions I posed in the reply to your earlier post.
One-line cliches just ain't hacking it.

I think the questions were serious. I don't think they danced around what you
said. I was caredful to go paragraphbyparagraph, carefully dissecting what you
said.

Please have enough respect to respond, even if it takes a couple of days.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Why do you post non-responses Burr? You are the least substantive
conservative here.

Michael Bryant wrote:
From: Burr


War, life and death ain't pretty.


Burr, please answer the questions I posed in the reply to your earlier post.
One-line cliches just ain't hacking it.

I think the questions were serious. I don't think they danced around what you
said. I was caredful to go paragraphbyparagraph, carefully dissecting what you
said.

Please have enough respect to respond, even if it takes a couple of days.

Morning Michael,
Traveled most of the night then got half a nights sleep BUT, I'll
review you nice reply later today and see what I can say in rebuttal.

Burr

On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:20:57 GMT, Burr wrote:



Michael Bryant wrote:
From: Burr


War, life and death ain't pretty.


Burr, please answer the questions I posed in the reply to your earlier post.
One-line cliches just ain't hacking it.

I think the questions were serious. I don't think they danced around what you
said. I was caredful to go paragraphbyparagraph, carefully dissecting what you
said.

Please have enough respect to respond, even if it takes a couple of days.

Morning Michael,
Traveled most of the night then got half a nights sleep BUT, I'll
review you nice reply later today and see what I can say in rebuttal.

Burr

Burr, thanks to you I've come up with a new term. Dumservative -
with the b left out. It fits you.

Thank you Bill, Thank you very much!

He didn't insult me or nothing did he??

Burr

Bill Everhart wrote:

On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:20:57 GMT, Burr wrote:



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: Burr


War, life and death ain't pretty.


Burr, please answer the questions I posed in the reply to your earlier post.
One-line cliches just ain't hacking it.

I think the questions were serious. I don't think they danced around what you
said. I was caredful to go paragraphbyparagraph, carefully dissecting what you
said.

Please have enough respect to respond, even if it takes a couple of days.


Morning Michael,
Traveled most of the night then got half a nights sleep BUT, I'll
review you nice reply later today and see what I can say in rebuttal.

Burr


Burr, thanks to you I've come up with a new term. Dumservative -
with the b left out. It fits you.