Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now the modern AM radio's I buy are all crap, esp
car radio's. They can not pull in stations, for nothing. That's why I have a 60,000(original miles from the aunt) 1983 Dodge Omni. Well, that's not why, she gave it to me, but it has an AC Delco radio in it, that has either five or six (I think five) preset push-buttons. But they aren't 'buttons'..they're slants (I call them, real thin.) That is one good AM car receiver. I don't know if it has a tube in it, I wouldn't think. But when you turn it on, the backlight will come on but the sound won't for about five seconds, and it says that in the original radio manual in the glove compartment. The one speaker is directly above it, all I need, a good DXer for a cruise. It has just two knobs, but the on/off/volume knob also has a pull-out attenuator which works like a dream. My suggestion is, if you're truly wanting a good AM radio (I don't do music-so loss of FM isn't a biggie) go to a 'good reputable' junkyard and get you one that is strictly just for the BCB. The one up here where I live, actually two of them,as soon as you walk in they have hundreds that they've pulled and have in a glass cabinet. They don't cost that much either and your problem is solved.;-) ~^Monitoring The Spectrum^~ Hammarlund HQ129X /Heathkit Q Multiplier Hammarlund HQ140X Multiple GE P-780's(GREAT BCB Radios) RCA Victor *Strato- World* RCA Victor RJC77W-K(Walnut Grain) 1942 Zenith Wave Magnet 6G 601M Cathedral/ Ross#2311/Rhapsody-MultiBand DX100/394/*SUPER*398/399/402 OMGS Transistor Eight/Realistic 12-1451 Henry Kloss Model One/Bell+Howell ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Alpha Delta DX Sloper 57ft. 500ft. 12AWG. (non-terminated) 120ft. 12 AWG Sloper 2 Radio Shack Loop Antennas Radio Shack Amplified Antenna 30X30 DiamondLoop(six section 830pf Cap) * Diamond Loop mounted to Lazy Susan TurnTable* *21/2X2ft.FiveSpoked~Penta-Loop~PancakeLoop* |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The AM section in the Cambridge Audio Model T500 tuner is good, and it is a
dual conversion design. The sound of it is nothing to write home about, though. Pete "Mediaguy500" wrote in message ... In many, many applications today where an AM tuner is included (a low-priced stereo reciever is a good example) the AM circuitry is not even as good as the better "pocket" transistor radios of the 1960's. The designer's view is: "Hey, they aren't buying a stereo rceiver to listen to AM, fercryinoutloud!" - and they save some nickles there exactly. That has been my experience also. No matter what modern radios I buy or hear at someone else's house (no matter what the price is) does not do good at picking up AM and in fact, is very poor at picking up AM, while the FM side is good. While the old radios I have seen pick up AM as well as today's radios pick up FM. The FM broadcast band first gained popularity over the AM broadcast band sometime in the mid-1970's to late 1970's). altthough I'm not sure when the manufacturers decided to stop making AM reception on radios any good. The older radios are probably the better bet for good AM reception, in my opinion. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I were a DXer and not a SWLer, I would get a WWII military receiver. Those
were no-frills radios that could just about hear anything that was on the air. And when a band was open, the receiver would sound dead -- except when there was a signal. I know and totally agree with what you said. Do you mean though for a car? If so, where would one find one of these? Would it mount in a car or take some ingenuity? That's kind of the way it is with that old Delco, is it possible it has a tube in it? No volume right away just like my tube receivers here at home. It'll be quiet while I'm driving a straight ten mile stretch along the river slowly turning the knob and then bam- there's a station, or if two are on top of each other, I pull out on the on/off/volume and presto, I have only one station. I love it and will keep it till I die, but if I could find what your talking about, I'd definitely put it in and moves the Delco inside or maybe keep both of them in there. :-D ~^Monitoring The Spectrum^~ Hammarlund HQ129X /Heathkit Q Multiplier Hammarlund HQ140X Multiple GE P-780's(GREAT BCB Radios) RCA Victor *Strato- World* RCA Victor RJC77W-K(Walnut Grain) 1942 Zenith Wave Magnet 6G 601M Cathedral/ Ross#2311/Rhapsody-MultiBand DX100/394/*SUPER*398/399/402 OMGS Transistor Eight/Realistic 12-1451 Henry Kloss Model One/Bell+Howell ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Alpha Delta DX Sloper 57ft. 500ft. 12AWG. (non-terminated) 120ft. 12 AWG Sloper 2 Radio Shack Loop Antennas Radio Shack Amplified Antenna 30X30 DiamondLoop(six section 830pf Cap) * Diamond Loop mounted to Lazy Susan TurnTable* *21/2X2ft.FiveSpoked~Penta-Loop~PancakeLoop* |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few hundred feet of wire hooked to just about any halfway-decent radio
will bring in plenty of DX. That'd look killer while driving. ;-) ~^Monitoring The Spectrum^~ Hammarlund HQ129X /Heathkit Q Multiplier Hammarlund HQ140X Multiple GE P-780's(GREAT BCB Radios) RCA Victor *Strato- World* RCA Victor RJC77W-K(Walnut Grain) 1942 Zenith Wave Magnet 6G 601M Cathedral/ Ross#2311/Rhapsody-MultiBand DX100/394/*SUPER*398/399/402 OMGS Transistor Eight/Realistic 12-1451 Henry Kloss Model One/Bell+Howell ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Alpha Delta DX Sloper 57ft. 500ft. 12AWG. (non-terminated) 120ft. 12 AWG Sloper 2 Radio Shack Loop Antennas Radio Shack Amplified Antenna 30X30 DiamondLoop(six section 830pf Cap) * Diamond Loop mounted to Lazy Susan TurnTable* *21/2X2ft.FiveSpoked~Penta-Loop~PancakeLoop* |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Realistic DX-100 like that. I suppose it was factory
aligned at 455 kHz, but the IF had a double peak. I realigned it to the center frequency of the ceramic ************rest snipped**************** You have one of those Frank? You like? LOL. I love mine. I had two and traded with DXZoner, who used to post in here about a year ago. It was my first 'I thought' real receiver. I think the definition of your 'first' receiver is the one that peaked your curiousity and then you continued in the radio hobby. That's the DX100 for me. Matter of fact, I went in the living room about fifteen minutes ago and turned it on to let it warm up. It's in mint condition, got the box and papers for it. Had a tech buddie of mine get in it with his equipment and he said it was just a tad off. I don't know how much a tad was/is. But I'll measure it with my DX399 hooked to a yo-yo antenna wire from Bil'ls company (that antenna has been everywhere and been put through crap) and match it up to see the exact freq. at it's always dead on. But it has to be on for about a good 45minutes to be stable. How's the drift on yours? When does it even out for you on your piece? ~^Monitoring The Spectrum^~ Hammarlund HQ129X /Heathkit Q Multiplier Hammarlund HQ140X Multiple GE P-780's(GREAT BCB Radios) RCA Victor *Strato- World* RCA Victor RJC77W-K(Walnut Grain) 1942 Zenith Wave Magnet 6G 601M Cathedral/ Ross#2311/Rhapsody-MultiBand DX100/394/*SUPER*398/399/402 OMGS Transistor Eight/Realistic 12-1451 Henry Kloss Model One/Bell+Howell ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Alpha Delta DX Sloper 57ft. 500ft. 12AWG. (non-terminated) 120ft. 12 AWG Sloper 2 Radio Shack Loop Antennas Radio Shack Amplified Antenna 30X30 DiamondLoop(six section 830pf Cap) * Diamond Loop mounted to Lazy Susan TurnTable* *21/2X2ft.FiveSpoked~Penta-Loop~PancakeLoop* |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "GO BEARCATS" wrote in message ... You have one of those Frank? You like? LOL. I love mine. I had two and traded with DXZoner, who used to post in here about a year ago. I've got mixed feelings about it. The sensitivity and selectitivity are OK. The radio rejects power line noise well. It doesn't use much power, and it looks like it would be easy to make an external battery pack for it if I wanted to go portable with it. The image rejection is poor, especially on the top two bands. The stability is OK for AM.. None of the problems are unexpected on an unexpensive radio. In my opinion, the radio's real drawback is it's tuning. The tuning has too much drag and backlash. It feels rubbery. The dial graduations are too coarse. The fine tuning isn't nearly as useful as a real bandspread. I've only seen pictures of the DX-200. It does have a sort of family resembelance to the DX-100. The DX-200 looks to have better dial graduations and a real bandspread. If the 200 is the 100 with better tuning, it's probably a pretty good radio. The DX-100 is a decent radio for AM DXing. I can often hear WLW during the day here in the Chicago area off the internal ferrite antenna. The radio's weaknesses get more troublesome on the higher bands. It was my first 'I thought' real receiver. I think the definition of your 'first' receiver is the one that peaked your curiousity and then you continued in the radio hobby. That's the DX100 for me. Matter of fact, I went in the living room about fifteen minutes ago and turned it on to let it warm up. It's in mint condition, got the box and papers for it. Had a tech buddie of mine get in it with his equipment and he said it was just a tad off. I don't know how much a tad was/is. But I'll measure it with my DX399 hooked to a yo-yo antenna wire from Bil'ls company (that antenna has been everywhere and been put through crap) and match it up to see the exact freq. at it's always dead on. But it has to be on for about a good 45minutes to be stable. How's the drift on yours? When does it even out for you on your piece? Maybe fifteen minutes to half an hour and there's no noticable drift on AM. It never stabilizes enough to be "set and forget" on SSB. It will drift noticably with room temperature changes. Frank Dresser |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My DX-200 is a drifter. Pretty worthless with tinny sound.
It does "look" cool though.... "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "GO BEARCATS" wrote in message ... You have one of those Frank? You like? LOL. I love mine. I had two and traded with DXZoner, who used to post in here about a year ago. I've got mixed feelings about it. The sensitivity and selectitivity are OK. The radio rejects power line noise well. It doesn't use much power, and it looks like it would be easy to make an external battery pack for it if I wanted to go portable with it. The image rejection is poor, especially on the top two bands. The stability is OK for AM.. None of the problems are unexpected on an unexpensive radio. In my opinion, the radio's real drawback is it's tuning. The tuning has too much drag and backlash. It feels rubbery. The dial graduations are too coarse. The fine tuning isn't nearly as useful as a real bandspread. I've only seen pictures of the DX-200. It does have a sort of family resembelance to the DX-100. The DX-200 looks to have better dial graduations and a real bandspread. If the 200 is the 100 with better tuning, it's probably a pretty good radio. The DX-100 is a decent radio for AM DXing. I can often hear WLW during the day here in the Chicago area off the internal ferrite antenna. The radio's weaknesses get more troublesome on the higher bands. It was my first 'I thought' real receiver. I think the definition of your 'first' receiver is the one that peaked your curiousity and then you continued in the radio hobby. That's the DX100 for me. Matter of fact, I went in the living room about fifteen minutes ago and turned it on to let it warm up. It's in mint condition, got the box and papers for it. Had a tech buddie of mine get in it with his equipment and he said it was just a tad off. I don't know how much a tad was/is. But I'll measure it with my DX399 hooked to a yo-yo antenna wire from Bil'ls company (that antenna has been everywhere and been put through crap) and match it up to see the exact freq. at it's always dead on. But it has to be on for about a good 45minutes to be stable. How's the drift on yours? When does it even out for you on your piece? Maybe fifteen minutes to half an hour and there's no noticable drift on AM. It never stabilizes enough to be "set and forget" on SSB. It will drift noticably with room temperature changes. Frank Dresser |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Hackett" wrote in message hlink.net... My DX-200 is a drifter. Pretty worthless with tinny sound. The appearant drift of my DX-100 was reduced after I aligned it. The ceramic IF filter didn't peak at exactly 455 kHz. The IF had a dip between two peaks. I was tuning it in on the bigger of the two peaks, but didn't take much drift for it to get detuned. I religned the IF cans to the peak of the ceramic filter, something like 456 kHz. Really very little difference. But after the relignment, I'm sure the bandpass was more symmetrical, and a drift of a few hundred Hz didn't produce so much audio distortion. No doubt the local oscillator was just as drifty as it always had been, but the tuning was a bit less critical. If tuning across a strong station seems to give an unsymerical response on the S-meter, a careful alignment may fix a couple of problems. It does "look" cool though.... And I'm sure making cool looking radios was a big part of the business plan of the Hallidrifters Corporation. Frank Dresser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? | Broadcasting | |||
Sangean, best FM reception: DT-110, DT-200V, or DT-300VW? | Shortwave | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |