From: "-=jd=-"

If you look at how many NEW OFF-TOPIC THREADS are STARTED by both of you, you

win, hands down. We're not talking about replies to existing threads by
either of you. You most certainly initiate, start, originally post, begin
(ummm, how else can I say this so that it permeates that campus-rhetoric-
laden mind of yours) kick-off, commence, bring about, create, do, effect,
embark on, enter on, enter upon, establish, eventuate, generate, impel,
inaugurate, induce, initiate, instigate, institute, introduce, launch, lead,
make, open, originate, produce more (Initial/New) OT threads than N8KDV.

The original poster's (telemon ?) message says "with all the OT threads he
has started". Note the word "started". He didn't say "replied to". He didn't
say "added on", he didn't say "continued"... he said "Started". Now, I will
rightly and correctly be able to call you a bald-faced liar if you want to
openly deny that. Yes, you are *hardly* the paragon of objectivity. For once
it would be nice if you could demonstrate some self-respect and manage to
control your penchant for trying to spin your way out of a hole.

How did you so eloquently put it, "fabricated bull****"? Indeed! LOL!

Well, I missed whatever Telamon had to say. He was blocked months ago.

But, technically, you're still wrong. Since a new thread is began with a new
subject header, Lare still comes out on top. You have to admit that he changes
the subject line in virtually every response. That puts him way over the top!

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't resist
the temptation!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael 'I got a multitude of problems' Bryant wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

If you look at how many NEW OFF-TOPIC THREADS are STARTED by both of you, you

win, hands down. We're not talking about replies to existing threads by
either of you. You most certainly initiate, start, originally post, begin
(ummm, how else can I say this so that it permeates that campus-rhetoric-
laden mind of yours) kick-off, commence, bring about, create, do, effect,
embark on, enter on, enter upon, establish, eventuate, generate, impel,
inaugurate, induce, initiate, instigate, institute, introduce, launch, lead,
make, open, originate, produce more (Initial/New) OT threads than N8KDV.

The original poster's (telemon ?) message says "with all the OT threads he
has started". Note the word "started". He didn't say "replied to". He didn't
say "added on", he didn't say "continued"... he said "Started". Now, I will
rightly and correctly be able to call you a bald-faced liar if you want to
openly deny that. Yes, you are *hardly* the paragon of objectivity. For once
it would be nice if you could demonstrate some self-respect and manage to
control your penchant for trying to spin your way out of a hole.

How did you so eloquently put it, "fabricated bull****"? Indeed! LOL!

Well, I missed whatever Telamon had to say. He was blocked months ago.

But, technically, you're still wrong. Since a new thread is began with a new
subject header, Lare still comes out on top. You have to admit that he changes
the subject line in virtually every response. That puts him way over the top!

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael 'I think I'm right, but most times I'm wrong... I'm a 'tard' Bryant
wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...

You do have a gambling problem...

Michael 'I waste my money on silly bets and drugs' Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...

Here's a tip for ya Fat Boy... I didn't get to make those investments by
making silly bets or by buying drugs...

That's a 'freebie' for you.

Get a clue.

Short Wave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:33:33 -0400, dxAce© wrote:



Michael 'I got a multitude of problems' Bryant wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

If you look at how many NEW OFF-TOPIC THREADS are STARTED by both of you, you

win, hands down. We're not talking about replies to existing threads by
either of you. You most certainly initiate, start, originally post, begin
(ummm, how else can I say this so that it permeates that campus-rhetoric-
laden mind of yours) kick-off, commence, bring about, create, do, effect,
embark on, enter on, enter upon, establish, eventuate, generate, impel,
inaugurate, induce, initiate, instigate, institute, introduce, launch, lead,
make, open, originate, produce more (Initial/New) OT threads than N8KDV.

The original poster's (telemon ?) message says "with all the OT threads he
has started". Note the word "started". He didn't say "replied to". He didn't
say "added on", he didn't say "continued"... he said "Started". Now, I will
rightly and correctly be able to call you a bald-faced liar if you want to
openly deny that. Yes, you are *hardly* the paragon of objectivity. For once
it would be nice if you could demonstrate some self-respect and manage to
control your penchant for trying to spin your way out of a hole.

How did you so eloquently put it, "fabricated bull****"? Indeed! LOL!

Well, I missed whatever Telamon had to say. He was blocked months ago.

But, technically, you're still wrong. Since a new thread is began with a new
subject header, Lare still comes out on top. You have to admit that he changes
the subject line in virtually every response. That puts him way over the top!

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!

The previous message was brought to you by the Village Idiot, Steve Lare. Proving
once again that stupid is as stupid does.

Thanks Fat Boy!

Short Wave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:42:24 -0400, dxAce© wrote:



Michael 'I think I'm right, but most times I'm wrong... I'm a 'tard' Bryant
wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...

You do have a gambling problem...

The previous message was brought to you by the Village Idiot, Steve Lare. Proving
once again that stupid is as stupid does.

Thanks Fat Boy!

Short Wave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:48:39 -0400, dxAce© wrote:



Michael 'I waste my money on silly bets and drugs' Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...

Here's a tip for ya Fat Boy... I didn't get to make those investments by
making silly bets or by buying drugs...

That's a 'freebie' for you.

Get a clue.
The previous message was brought to you by the Village Idiot, Steve Lare. Proving
once again that stupid is as stupid does.

Thanks Fat Boy!

Short Wave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 17:08:19 -0400, dxAce© wrote:



Short Wave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:48:39 -0400, dxAce© wrote:



Michael 'I waste my money on silly bets and drugs' Bryant wrote:

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?dxAce=A9?=

Hey, if you don't like it, killfile me. Here's betting that you can't
resist
the temptation!

Once again, Bryant places a bet! I figure along with his habitual lies,
fabrications and drug use he also has a gambling problem!


Here's another bet that you're too big of a wussy to risk your precious
investments when you might lose...

Here's a tip for ya Fat Boy... I didn't get to make those investments by
making silly bets or by buying drugs...

That's a 'freebie' for you.

Get a clue.
The previous message was brought to you by the Village Idiot, Steve Lare. Proving
once again that stupid is as stupid does.

Thanks Fat Boy!

The previous message was brought to you by the Village Idiot, Steve Lare. Proving
once again that stupid is as stupid does.

Subject: Bryant is really outdoing himself as 'Short Wave'

Yeah, Steve. I've never had any trouble in thinking of ORIGINAL responses to
your juvenile drivel.

Let me assure you: I am not Short Wave.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)