Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www2.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/09/2/?nc=1
NEWINGTON, CT, Jun 9, 2004 --- The National Telecommunications and Information Administration`s comments in the BPL Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) more clearly reveal the political face of an agency eager and determined to sell the technology`s viability, no matter what its own scientists have concluded. The NTIA is the principal White House adviser on telecommunications policy and administers federal government radio spectrum. Its largely scientific Phase 1 report, which clearly established BPL`s interference potential, already is part of the proceeding. The agency`s formal comments, filed June 4, take pains to depict the technology not only as workable but desirable to all--provided that BPL operators and utilities are willing to jump through additional NTIA-recommended hoops. At one point, the NTIA calls BPL ``a win-win proposition,`` claiming that its widespread deployment could lead to a reduction in power line noise. ``Substitution of BPL emissions for the strong, much wider-bandwidth power line noise emissions will broadly reduce risks of interference to radiocommunications,`` the agency asserts. The NTIA says it`s measured power line noise levels that are higher than the proposed BPL emission limits. Existing power line noise poses ``greater local interference risks`` than BPL would. But that prediction came with a qualification: ``This is not to say that NTIA expects there will be a net, nationwide reduction of interference risks; instead, NTIA believes there will be at least partial offsetting of the interference risks posed by BPL.`` The NTIA claims that reduction of strong power line noise ``is a basic technical requirement`` for acceptable BPL performance at the field strength limits the FCC has proposed and the NTIA has endorsed. Widespread BPL deployment, the agency goes on to say, also would provide an improved mechanism for utilities to detect and diagnose electrical grid failures and problems. Nowhere does NTIA acknowledge that power line noise interference to licensed radio services already contravenes FCC Part 15 rules regulating unintentional radiators--the same rules that apply to power line carrier and BPL systems. The ARRL assists the FCC in dealing with hundreds of power line noise complaints from amateurs each year. The agency does come close to recommending a limit on BPL signal power to compensate for variations in power line noise, however. ``Because radio noise on power lines can vary by upwards of 20 dB throughout a day,`` the comments said, ``a rule should require adjustment of BPL signal power to preclude unnecessarily high levels of radiated emissions.`` The NTIA said that while it`s still evaluating the potential of BPL power control to reduce interference risk, ``it is obvious that reducing Access BPL emissions by about 20 dB (a factor of 100) when noise is at relatively low levels will substantially reduce interference risks.`` NTIA Smells a Rat? Addressing BPL`s interference potential is a persistent theme throughout the agency`s remarks, and sometimes its stance verges on the overly defensive. Early on, NTIA raised the specter of coax- munching rodents with an over-the-top example of ``suspected`` versus genuine interference: Poor reception chalked up to BPL could turn out to be a pest-control issue, the agency suggested in a footnote. ``For example, rodents sometimes chew coaxial cables or twin-lead transmission lines and cause significant reductions or complete loss of the desired signal power that should reach the receiver,`` the NTIA said. ``In many other cases, interference is realized but not caused by the suspected device.`` Additional Hoops To reduce interference risks from the technology, the NTIA comments recommend ``several new BPL rule elements`` to augment the FCC`s proposals. ``These rules also help ensure that interference from BPL systems would be eliminated expeditiously with little effort needed on the part of any radio operator,`` the NTIA predicted. Its recommendations, the agency says, shift emphasis away from eliminating interference and toward preventing it--something it says BPL operators have a strong incentive to do. FCC Chairman Michael Powell surfs the `net via a BPL-provided Internet connection in a home in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina. Progress Energy is conducting a BPL field trial in the neighborhood. ``NTIA believes that BPL operators, as the parties responsible for eliminating harmful interference, will voluntarily implement equipment, organizational elements, and installation and operating practices that prevent interference and facilitate interference mitigation,`` the agency`s comments state. ``Market appeal of BPL could quickly evaporate if BPL systems were to endemically cause interference and have to be shut down with operating authorizations swiftly revoked if necessary.`` The NTIA recommends the FCC make its proposed BPL deployment notification requirements retroactive. BPL operators ``should be required to notify of planned deployments at least 30 days in advance of implementation and to consider the coordination data they receive regarding local radio receiver operations in order to prevent interference,`` its comments say. According to the NTIA, such advance notification would give ``local radio receiver operators`` a chance to inform BPL operators of potential interference situations. To make it possible for radio operators to diagnose suspected BPL interference, BPL operators should provide sufficient details of the BPL emission to enable identification using a spectrum analyzer. The NTIA says it`s still considering the idea of a BPL system identifier that a conventional radio receiver could detect. The NTIA also recommends that the FCC apply its more stringent certification, rather than verification, procedures, to authorize BPL systems. ``Because Access BPL systems pose relatively high interference risks, certification rather than verification should be required,`` the NTIA advised. Certification would require independent testing, as opposed to having a BPL operator merely attest that its system complies with FCC rules. Key Phase 2 Study Findings Included As Acting NTIA Administrator Michael Gallagher indicated in May (see ``NTIA Head Tips Hand on Agency`s Additional BPL Findings``), the comments include some key findings of his agency`s pending Phase 2 BPL study, set for release later this year. The Phase 2 study will provide ``additional guidance`` on contending with BPL interference issues, but the NTIA says it doesn`t want the FCC to hold up the proceeding until the report`s release. Its comments urge the Commission to ``promptly adopt effective technical rules`` to enable BPL development and implementation. The FCC has extended the reply comment deadline to June 22 to allow stakeholders time to review the NTIA`s comments. The agency`s Phase 2 study will, among other things, assess interference risks due to aggregation (ie, total emissions from multiple BPL systems) and ionospheric propagation of interfering signals from BPL systems. The NTIA says it`s determined that BPL aggregation and ionospheric propagation ``is not a potential near- term problem.`` The NTIA predicts that hundreds of thousands and ultimately millions of BPL devices could be deployed under the rules the FCC is expected to adopt before ionospheric propagation and aggregate BPL emissions become a serious interference issue. The Phase 2 study also will evaluate the effectiveness of proposed Part 15 measurement techniques. The NTIA`s comments include the study`s recommendation for a ``height-correction factor`` of 5 dB to BPL measurements made at a height of 1 meter. The NTIA has acknowledged that peak field strength from a BPL device can be as much as 20 dB higher than the peak measured at a height of 1 meter under current Part 15 rules. Because the peak does not occur consistently at a particular distance from a BPL device, peak field strength must be determined by tracking the entire power line, the NTIA advises. The NTIA also suggests coordination areas in which a designated authority would coordinate all planned BPL deployment. It also wants to exclude certain specific bands and frequencies and geographical areas to protect critical federal government systems. The agency further proposes that BPL rules provide for prompt response to complaints of suspected interference. Shutting down the system, however, would be a last resort, in the NTIA`s view. The NTIA said its ``refinements`` to the FCC-proposed BPL rules ``will fully alleviate the concerns of all parties`` to the BPL proceeding. It left the door open to further study of various technical issues. ``Moreover, these rules create an environment in which BPL proponents can properly gauge investment risks and fulfill the protection requirements of radio communications,`` the comments conclude. The NTIA`s comments in ET Docket 04-37 are available on the NTIA Web site. For additional information, visit the ``Broadband Over Power Line (BPL) and Amateur Radio``page on the ARRL Web site. To support the League`s efforts in this area, visit the ARRL`s secure BPL Web site. Copyright © 2004, American Radio Relay League, Inc. All Rights Reserved. (via John Norfolk, dxldyahoogroups) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Power Line Noise - Gone | Shortwave | |||
NRD-92/92M/93 Noise Fix 2 | Shortwave | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |