Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T. Early wrote:
Hey, forget the repartee. I haven't even had a 'partee', so it's tough doing the 're' We're all waiting for you to produce more "authentic" pictures of this stuff. Surely one of your loony left websites has been able to "discover" some by now. I have no loony left websites. As far as I know, web sites are apolitical. On a more serious note, I'd like your opinion. For the sake of argument, say there ARE a lot more bits of evidence showing really horrible acts. Do you fell it right or wrong *if* the evidence is covered up or slowed down in release to limit damage to GW in an election year? mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = m II wrote in message
= = = news:HAnKc.43158$2i3.6401@clgrps12... T. Early wrote: Hey, forget the repartee. I haven't even had a 'partee', so it's tough doing the 're' We're all waiting for you to produce more "authentic" pictures of this stuff. Surely one of your loony left websites has been able to "discover" some by now. I have no loony left websites. As far as I know, web sites are apolitical. On a more serious note, I'd like your opinion. For the sake of argument, say there ARE a lot more bits of evidence showing really horrible acts. Do you fell it right or wrong *if* the evidence is covered up or slowed down in release to limit damage to GW in an election year? mike MII, Actually the 'logic' goes just the opposite. Instead of getting all the Bad News out "Now" and putting it in the past. The Liberal Media Elite are slowly letting it out a few photos at a time up to the day of the election; in order to try and influence the outcome of the election day-by-day; week-by-week; month-by-month {against President George "W" Bush} for John 'ff' Kerry and the Democrats. ~ RHF .. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "m II" wrote in message news:HAnKc.43158$2i3.6401@clgrps12... As far as I know, web sites are apolitical. When were you born? Yesterday? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
''Liberal Media Elite''???
Where do you get this ****? On 18 Jul 2004 02:56:38 -0700, (RHF) wrote: The Liberal Media Elite are slowly letting it out a few photos at a time up to the day of the election; in order to try and influence the outcome of the election day-by-day; week-by-week; month-by-month {against President George "W" Bush} for John 'ff' Kerry and the Democrats. ~ RHF . |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CW wrote:
"m II" wrote in message news:HAnKc.43158$2i3.6401@clgrps12... As far as I know, web sites are apolitical. When were you born? Yesterday? I wish I had been. Objects in and of themselves have no political leanings. Their owners/authors may have, though. I should have been more precise, I'm sorry. mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
Actually the 'logic' goes just the opposite. Instead of getting all the Bad News out "Now" and putting it in the past. The Liberal Media Elite are slowly letting it out a few photos at a time up to the day of the election; in order to try and influence the outcome of the election day-by-day; week-by-week; month-by-month {against President George "W" Bush} for John 'ff' Kerry and the Democrats. How is it possible that news/information can be manipulated this way by EITHER side? If it's there, it should be out in it's entirety. Why doesn't the Bush side release everything in one go then, to stop the slow 'leaks' by the opposing camp? News is meant to be heard, not played with for political gain. That may well be why a lot of folks started listening to shortwave to begin with. Even as a kid I thought the truth lay somewhere between what Washington and the Kremlin said...mind you, sometimes they BOTH stretched things beyond belief. mike |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... ''Liberal Media Elite''??? Where do you get this ****? On 18 Jul 2004 02:56:38 -0700, (RHF) wrote: The Liberal Media Elite are slowly letting it out a few photos at a time up to the day of the election; in order to try and influence the outcome of the election day-by-day; week-by-week; month-by-month {against President George "W" Bush} for John 'ff' Kerry and the Democrats. ~ RHF . You're right, David -- you're liberal (hell, you've even mentioned you're a Marxist and an "anarchist" in this group), but you're far too big a dummy to ever be considered elite. -- Stinger |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 04:38:08 GMT, m II
wrote: Did the pumping private have a picture of GW taped to the back of the victim? Many of the US armed forces get erections when they see him. It *is* an erections year. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
Did the pumping private have a picture of GW taped to the back of the victim? Many of the US armed forces get erections when they see him. Much to the chagrin of the Canadian Armed Forces who can't get erections at all. So true. They even had to get a 'lift' to Afghanistan. The Canadian armed forces have been gutted over the years. The income taxes haven't declined in proportion. I'd set the forces at 100,000 and return to a strictly peacekeeping role. Being a running dog for the war mongering Bu****es is no way to conduct one's external affairs. mike |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know anything about Marx (unless you mean Julius Marx). I do
enjoy thinking like an anarchist libertarian from time to time; I was fired from Pacifica for being too right wing. I actually think I am opposed to the prevailing power structure. Therefore, if the Nazis are in charge, I must be a liberal (subject to change). ''1 a singular or plural in construction : the choice part : CREAM the elite of the entertainment world b singular or plural in construction : the best of a class superachievers who dominate the computer elite -- Marilyn Chase c singular or plural in construction : the socially superior part of society how the elite live -- A P World how the F.-speaking elite ... was changing -- Economist d : a group of persons who by virtue of position or education exercise much power or influence members of the ruling elite the intellectual elites of the country e : a member of such an elite -- usually used in plural the elites ..., pursuing their studies in Europe -- Robert Wernick'' --m-w dot com On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:11:40 -0500, "Stinger" wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . ''Liberal Media Elite''??? Where do you get this ****? On 18 Jul 2004 02:56:38 -0700, (RHF) wrote: The Liberal Media Elite are slowly letting it out a few photos at a time up to the day of the election; in order to try and influence the outcome of the election day-by-day; week-by-week; month-by-month {against President George "W" Bush} for John 'ff' Kerry and the Democrats. ~ RHF . You're right, David -- you're liberal (hell, you've even mentioned you're a Marxist and an "anarchist" in this group), but you're far too big a dummy to ever be considered elite. -- Stinger |