Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom
IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
this article has serious flaws, becareful not to use it to make a buyinh
gdecision "Mike Terry" wrote in message ... Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Mike Terry"
writes: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? - Probably the one hooked up to an MFJ -1046 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Terry wrote: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ Gee, no Drake receivers? How can it be a definitive test of the 'top' receivers. Tossing the R75 into the mix is an insult! dxAce |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious about your comment, Mike. What do you see as flaws in the
author's observations? It sounds to me like he's just reporting his own findings based upon the strong signal environment he lives in. Jan Alvestad had only circulated his article privately until I urged him to share it with more people via the dxing.info site. I think it is interesting and useful reading, and certainly just one of many viewpoints out there to consider in the purchase of a receiver. In general, I agree with most of his AR7030, R75 and Racal observations as I have a highly-modded R75 and a somewhat modified RA6790GM (a more recent Racal but from the same heritage as Jan's RA1772). I've also owned two AR7030s, and currently have a RX340 in the shack on loan. Nothing in Jan's article strikes me as seriously off-base. Good DXing, Guy Atkins Puyallup, WA USA "mike maghakian" wrote in message ... this article has serious flaws, becareful not to use it to make a buyinh gdecision "Mike Terry" wrote in message ... Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Diverd4777 wrote: In article , "Mike Terry" writes: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? I don't even own one, but if the Drake R8b isn't on that list, it's not a fair comparison, IMO. Tony |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: Mike Terry wrote: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ Gee, no Drake receivers? How can it be a definitive test of the 'top' receivers. Tossing the R75 into the mix is an insult! dxAce No, it isn't. The R-75 is not a Drake R8b, true, but it is an excellent communications receiver. Or to put it another way, if the Drake R8b deserves to be in that mix - and it does (see my post before this one), the R-75 does, too. Unless I misunderstood, and this is one of your "tongue-in-cheek" replies. Tony |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Terry wrote: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ How did the R-75 get in there? Dave |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tony Meloche wrote: dxAce wrote: Mike Terry wrote: Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ Gee, no Drake receivers? How can it be a definitive test of the 'top' receivers. Tossing the R75 into the mix is an insult! dxAce No, it isn't. The R-75 is not a Drake R8b, true, but it is an excellent communications receiver. Or to put it another way, if the Drake R8b deserves to be in that mix - and it does (see my post before this one), the R-75 does, too. Unless I misunderstood, and this is one of your "tongue-in-cheek" replies. I'm getting rather good at that. dxAce |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Terry wrote:
Testing the top receivers: TenTec RX340, AOR AR7030, Racal RA1772 and Icom IC-R75. Which of these fine communications receivers is the best at locations with strong nearby transmitters? Find it out in a new article (PDF) by Jan Alvestad. http://www.dxing.info/ Those four receivers are hardly the only top ones. Does he plan to review some of the other high end receivers? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IARN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS GRADUATE SCHOOL | General | |||
a dipole made of two great sheets of metal? | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
If Ham Radio Were Invented Today (reprise) | Policy | |||
Great mobile scanner antenna - and cheap ! | Scanner |