"RHF" wrote:

It has been reported that the battle
damage report for his Boat on the
day that he got his Silver Star shows
that there was none.


Where can we find this "report?" The military rarely keeps equipment
maintenence records beyond a year or two, and almost never after the
equipment is "retired." It's 30 years later, which means those records are
likely long gone.

Stewart

In article et,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:

Sure, procedures WERE followed, but
still, they were awarded based upon
Kerry's bogus reports!


Provide some evidence that they were awarded based on reports written by
Kerry, something beyond unsubstantiated personal anecdotes or outright
biased rhetoric. Until then, I'll ignore such bogus claims. By the way, if
you wanted to delete newsgroups, you should have deleted the shortwave
newsgroup, not the two political newsgroups. I post mainly from the
political newsgroups and only rarely visit the shortwave newsgroup.

Let me see if I have this right.

You cross post off topic material to this news group and when someone
edits the Newsgroup header you complain.

You are truly clueless.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"-=jd=-" wrote:

(snip) After all, you still believe (or you've
fooled yourself into believing) that the CBS
docs are authentic. (snip)
(snip) Your mind is made up, just like your
mind is made up that the CBS docs are
authentic!


And why would anyone believe anything you have to say when you so
blantently lie about my earlier comments? Contrary to your claims above,
here is what I actually said in this newsgroup just ten days ago...

"Look, I don't know if the documents
are fake or not. However, the arguments
used so far to suggest they are fake (line
wrap, character spacing, and a few
superscript characters) are far less than
convincing. With only a photocopy
available, chemical analysis of the paper
would probably be useless. And the
person who sent photocopies of military
documents to the press is not likely to
come forward now to point to the original
documents. So, at this point, the
authenticity of the documents may simply
remain an open question." - 9/13/04

Enough said.

Stewart

"Telamon" wrote:

Let me see if I have this right.

You cross post off topic material to
this news group and when someone
edits the Newsgroup header you
complain. (snip)


It wasn't a complaint, simply a passing comment. Regardless, since this
topic was discussed in this newsgroup for several weeks, my message was
relevant to that discussion in this newsgroup. But, if someone truly felt a
need to delete newsgroups, it obviously should have been this newsgroup, not
the political newsgroups (where topics like this truly belong).

Stewart

Dwight Stewart wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:

Let me see if I have this right.

You cross post off topic material to
this news group and when someone
edits the Newsgroup header you
complain. (snip)

It wasn't a complaint, simply a passing comment. Regardless, since this
topic was discussed in this newsgroup for several weeks, my message was
relevant to that discussion in this newsgroup. But, if someone truly felt a
need to delete newsgroups, it obviously should have been this newsgroup, not
the political newsgroups (where topics like this truly belong).

But I did delete rec.radio.shortwave on that post, not the others.

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Dwight Stewart wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:

Let me see if I have this right.

You cross post off topic material to
this news group and when someone
edits the Newsgroup header you
complain. (snip)

It wasn't a complaint, simply a passing comment. Regardless, since this
topic was discussed in this newsgroup for several weeks, my message was
relevant to that discussion in this newsgroup. But, if someone truly felt a
need to delete newsgroups, it obviously should have been this newsgroup, not
the political newsgroups (where topics like this truly belong).

But I did delete rec.radio.shortwave on that post, not the others.

And, I did post it here also, separately. Please try and pay attention. I know it
must be hard for you to do, but please try.

Someday, you too, might be a 'dxace', but first you'll need to learn to pay
attention.

dxAce

In article ,
"-=jd=-" wrote:

On Wed 22 Sep 2004 10:44:31a, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote in message news:jdg4d.10168$mb6.4465
@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:

"-=jd=-" wrote:

(snip) After all, you still believe (or you've
fooled yourself into believing) that the CBS
docs are authentic. (snip)
(snip) Your mind is made up, just like your
mind is made up that the CBS docs are
authentic!


And why would anyone believe anything you have to say when you so
blantently lie about my earlier comments? Contrary to your claims above,
here is what I actually said in this newsgroup just ten days ago...

"Look, I don't know if the documents
are fake or not. However, the arguments
used so far to suggest they are fake (line
wrap, character spacing, and a few
superscript characters) are far less than
convincing. With only a photocopy
available, chemical analysis of the paper
would probably be useless. And the
person who sent photocopies of military
documents to the press is not likely to
come forward now to point to the original
documents. So, at this point, the
authenticity of the documents may simply
remain an open question." - 9/13/04

Enough said.

Stewart



So after everyone, including CBS and their experts are equivocating on the
doc's authenticity; not to mention that the source of the documents
(Burkett) has been discredited before; and on and on and on...

You're *still* holding out hope? You crack me up! Tell us all again how
you believe the "authenticity of the documents may simply remain an open
question." Tell us all again how Adm Route's investigation of Kerry's
medals extended below the formal request and was not limited only to the
procedure once the formal request was made.

If you still believe, or are holding out the tiniest shred of hope that
the "authenticity of the (CBS) documents may simply remain an open
question" even after Dan Rather has caved, why should we expect you to put
two and two together in this case? No, really - why *should* we expect you
to put two and two together in this case?

Didn't you hear the Blather - Burkett interview where Burkett stated
that he deliberately mislead Blather on the documents and that they are
fake? No doubt at all after that interview.

Let the investigations begin and lead... all the way to the Kerry
campaign.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"-=jd=-" wrote:

So after everyone, including CBS and
their experts are equivocating on the
doc's authenticity; not to mention that
the source of the documents (Burkett)
has been discredited before; and on
and on and on...
You're *still* holding out hope? You
crack me up! Tell us all again how
you believe the "authenticity of the
documents may simply remain an open
question." (snip)


Stop trying to fraudulently twist my words. You only discredit yourself
when you do so. The quote you use above was written eleven days ago, before
the additional evidence came out to cast doubt on the document's
authenticity. I've said nothing since about the authenticity of those
documents.

Stewart

= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = nk.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

So after everyone, including CBS and
their experts are equivocating on the
doc's authenticity; not to mention that
the source of the documents (Burkett)
has been discredited before; and on
and on and on...
You're *still* holding out hope? You
crack me up! Tell us all again how
you believe the "authenticity of the
documents may simply remain an open
question." (snip)

Stop trying to fraudulently twist my words. You only discredit
yourself when you do so. The quote you use above was written
eleven days ago, before the additional evidence came out to
cast doubt on the document's authenticity. I've said nothing
since about the authenticity of those documents.

Stewart

DS,

Everytime you "Post" you keep the LIES of Rather-Gate Alive.

- This puts Rather-Gate on Page One as a HeadLine above the fold.

- Keeps John 'ff' Kerry below the fold or on page #2.

The 'only' person who can Actually and Factually VERIFY these
Documents is Dead [.]

Point-of-Fact: The alleged 'author' of these questionable
documents Lt. Colonel Jerry B. Killian is Dead [.]

However the Trail-of-Evidence is Clear: The "KERRY" Connection !
John 'ff' Kerry Campaign Joe Lockhart Bill Burkett Dan Rather-Gate

UNDERSTAND: Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} still claim that
the FACTS are True and 'only' that the Documents are ?questionable?

THEREFO Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} feel they do not
need to "Apologize" to the Killian Family and to President Bush
and his Family.

REALITY: Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} are worng, Wrong. WRONG !

WHY WON'T CBS AND DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO THE KILLIAN FAMILY ?

WHY WON'T CBS AND DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO PRESIDENT BUSH AN HIS FAMILY ?

~ RHF
..

"-=jd=-" wrote:

(snip) So, in the face of mounting evidence
decidedly to the contrary, do you *still*
hold out hope that "the authenticity of the
documents may simply remain an open
question."?


I don't know, JD. Other than our recent messages, I haven't even thought
the documents in more than a week. Since it's old news, I haven't been
paying any attention. I'm a busy person who simply doesn't have time to
follow every little thing that is going on. So, if Rather said the documents
are in doubt, as you say he did, that is more than fine by me.

Stewart