Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anyone tell me whether SW receivers like ICF-7600GR or ICF-2010
catch the world above 30 Mhz. As per http://www.dxing.com/above30.htm there are whole lot of exciting stuff there. I will be thankful if you advise whether one could get them on the above class of recievers. Regards, Riz Abbasi |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Riz schrieb:
Can anyone tell me whether SW receivers like ICF-7600GR or ICF-2010 catch the world above 30 Mhz. As per http://www.dxing.com/above30.htm there are whole lot of exciting stuff there. Keep in mind that the higher you get, the less likely long distance reception becomes. Also, the specific usage may vary from country to country. I will be thankful if you advise whether one could get them on the above class of recievers. Both of them are capable of receiving the FM broadcast band from 76 to 108 MHz (to cover both the Japanese and Western FM bands, still omitting the IIRC 66 to 72 MHz OIRT band) with a bandwidth suited for wideband FM and nothing else, and the 2010 covers the air band (108 to 136 MHz) in AM. If you're seriously interested in the world beyond 30 MHz, the best idea would be investing into a decent scanner along with a discone or whatnot. Getting good performance both below and above 30 MHz in the same receiver will cost you a pretty penny - AR5000 and IC-R8500 would be the least expensive receivers matching this discription (though the AOR still is not better than a decent shortwave portable in terms of strong signal handling and such on SW, while the Icom does better there but isn't quite as good on the higher freqs as I remember), with more expensive (and better) gear like the mighty IC-R9000L (now discontinued) and the R&S EB200 (approx. 20000 USD) available. Stephan -- Meine Andere Seite: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 1xP3-500E, 512 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer ![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep in mind that the higher you get, the ess likely long distance
reception becomes. Also, the specific usage may vary from country to country. true. However, occasionally I hear dx from Detroit and Canada on VHF and UHF when listening to my handheld scanner from here in norheast Ohio. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep in mind that the higher you get, the ess likely long distance
reception becomes. Also, the specific usage may vary from country to country. true. However, occasionally I hear dx from Detroit and Canada on VHF and UHF when listening to my handheld scanner from here in norheast Ohio. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|