Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, folks - I have seen a good of info on Full Wave loops, and as I
have mentioned before, I intend to get one going here soon. I live on a small lot, and a full wave for lower HF freqs can have a pretty lengthy perimeter, several hundred feet - which I do not have room without lots of wiggling and gerrymandering. However, as I understand it, small loop antennas (like Wellbrooks, homebrews for MW and so forth) have the loops folded on top of themselves, allowing a lot of antenna in just a tiny fraction of the area, with multiple small loops making up the length. Could this be done for a horizontal full wave, maybe just a single doubling of the loop, so that you could stick, say, 120 meters' worth of wire on just a 60-meter perimeter? Is there any reason to believe that this would not be a good compromise, or that any special matching might need to be accomplished? Would the wires need to be a minimum or constant space apart? If there are any websites with this info, which so far I haven't been able to find, I would appreciate some pointers toward them. Many thanks, Bruce Jensen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(RHF) wrote in message . com...
= = = (bpnjensen) wrote in message = = = . com... Hi, folks - I have seen a good of info on Full Wave loops, and as I have mentioned before, I intend to get one going here soon. I live on a small lot, and a full wave for lower HF freqs can have a pretty lengthy perimeter, several hundred feet - which I do not have room without lots of wiggling and gerrymandering. However, as I understand it, small loop antennas (like Wellbrooks, homebrews for MW and so forth) have the loops folded on top of themselves, allowing a lot of antenna in just a tiny fraction of the area, with multiple small loops making up the length. Could this be done for a horizontal full wave, maybe just a single doubling of the loop, so that you could stick, say, 120 meters' worth of wire on just a 60-meter perimeter? Is there any reason to believe that this would not be a good compromise, or that any special matching might need to be accomplished? Would the wires need to be a minimum or constant space apart? If there are any websites with this info, which so far I haven't been able to find, I would appreciate some pointers toward them. Many thanks, Bruce Jensen BJ, When considering "Stacked" Two Turn (2X) SkyWave Loop Antennas: [ Try this amount of 'Spacing' between the Loops. ] 160 Meter Band = Two Turns of 254.5 Feet with 62 Inch Spacing - Only 63.6 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 529 Feet. 80 Meter Band = Two Turns of 134 Feet with 31 Inch Spacing - Only 33.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 268 Feet. 40 Meter Band = Two Turns of 70 Feet with 17 Inch Spacing - Only 17.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 141 Feet. iane ~ RHF Fascinating! It also appears, based on this series, that the separation between turns progresses linearly with wavelength. I assume also that this represents a minimum separation. Thanks, RHF - Within the dimensions of my available yard (55' x 60'), I may be able to make this work for a 90-m stacked loop. Drive the neighbors to distrrrrraction, though! Bruce Jensen |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = (bpnjensen) wrote in message
= = = . com... (RHF) wrote in message . com... = = = (bpnjensen) wrote in message = = = . com... Hi, folks - I have seen a good of info on Full Wave loops, and as I have mentioned before, I intend to get one going here soon. I live on a small lot, and a full wave for lower HF freqs can have a pretty lengthy perimeter, several hundred feet - which I do not have room without lots of wiggling and gerrymandering. However, as I understand it, small loop antennas (like Wellbrooks, homebrews for MW and so forth) have the loops folded on top of themselves, allowing a lot of antenna in just a tiny fraction of the area, with multiple small loops making up the length. Could this be done for a horizontal full wave, maybe just a single doubling of the loop, so that you could stick, say, 120 meters' worth of wire on just a 60-meter perimeter? Is there any reason to believe that this would not be a good compromise, or that any special matching might need to be accomplished? Would the wires need to be a minimum or constant space apart? If there are any websites with this info, which so far I haven't been able to find, I would appreciate some pointers toward them. Many thanks, Bruce Jensen BJ, When considering "Stacked" Two Turn (2X) SkyWave Loop Antennas: [ Try this amount of 'Spacing' between the Loops. ] 160 Meter Band = Two Turns of 254.5 Feet with 62 Inch Spacing - Only 63.6 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 529 Feet. 80 Meter Band = Two Turns of 134 Feet with 31 Inch Spacing - Only 33.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 268 Feet. 40 Meter Band = Two Turns of 70 Feet with 17 Inch Spacing - Only 17.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 141 Feet. iane ~ RHF Fascinating! It also appears, based on this series, that the separation between turns progresses linearly with wavelength. I assume also that this represents a minimum separation. Thanks, RHF - Within the dimensions of my available yard (55' x 60'), I may be able to make this work for a 90-m stacked loop. Drive the neighbors to distrrrrraction, though! Bruce Jensen BJ, FWIW: 'Rightly or Wrongly' I used the Formula for the Spacing of the "T2FD Antenna" to come up with this amount of spacing between the Turns since it seems to be Frequency 'dependent' with respect to the Lowest Operating Frequency. The Formulas for Calculating T2FD Dimensions are as follows. http://www.hard-core-dx.com/nordicdx.../t2design.html #2. The spacing between radiating wires ("B") is equal to 3000 divided by the lowest desired operating frequency (in kHz) and then multiplied by 3.28. The answer is in feet. Any Rebuttal ? Or does anyone have a Formula for a 'better' "Spacing" Number ? NOTE: If you are going to use your "Stacked" SkyWave Loop Antenna for transmitting try connecting two NE-2 Neon Lights and ten turns of wire. Mount it up near the top of one of your Antenna Supports, about one foot from the Loop Antenna Wire. Have fun 'watching' the neighbors "Watching" the Demon Eyes at Night. iane ~ RHF .. .. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(RHF) wrote: = = = (bpnjensen) wrote in message = = = . com... (RHF) wrote in message . com... = = = (bpnjensen) wrote in message = = = . com... Hi, folks - I have seen a good of info on Full Wave loops, and as I have mentioned before, I intend to get one going here soon. I live on a small lot, and a full wave for lower HF freqs can have a pretty lengthy perimeter, several hundred feet - which I do not have room without lots of wiggling and gerrymandering. However, as I understand it, small loop antennas (like Wellbrooks, homebrews for MW and so forth) have the loops folded on top of themselves, allowing a lot of antenna in just a tiny fraction of the area, with multiple small loops making up the length. Could this be done for a horizontal full wave, maybe just a single doubling of the loop, so that you could stick, say, 120 meters' worth of wire on just a 60-meter perimeter? Is there any reason to believe that this would not be a good compromise, or that any special matching might need to be accomplished? Would the wires need to be a minimum or constant space apart? If there are any websites with this info, which so far I haven't been able to find, I would appreciate some pointers toward them. Many thanks, Bruce Jensen BJ, When considering "Stacked" Two Turn (2X) SkyWave Loop Antennas: [ Try this amount of 'Spacing' between the Loops. ] 160 Meter Band = Two Turns of 254.5 Feet with 62 Inch Spacing - Only 63.6 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 529 Feet. 80 Meter Band = Two Turns of 134 Feet with 31 Inch Spacing - Only 33.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 268 Feet. 40 Meter Band = Two Turns of 70 Feet with 17 Inch Spacing - Only 17.5 Feet per Side with a 2X Total Length of 141 Feet. iane ~ RHF Fascinating! It also appears, based on this series, that the separation between turns progresses linearly with wavelength. I assume also that this represents a minimum separation. Thanks, RHF - Within the dimensions of my available yard (55' x 60'), I may be able to make this work for a 90-m stacked loop. Drive the neighbors to distrrrrraction, though! Bruce Jensen BJ, FWIW: 'Rightly or Wrongly' I used the Formula for the Spacing of the "T2FD Antenna" to come up with this amount of spacing between the Turns since it seems to be Frequency 'dependent' with respect to the Lowest Operating Frequency. The Formulas for Calculating T2FD Dimensions are as follows. http://www.hard-core-dx.com/nordicdx.../t2design.html #2. The spacing between radiating wires ("B") is equal to 3000 divided by the lowest desired operating frequency (in kHz) and then multiplied by 3.28. The answer is in feet. Any Rebuttal ? Or does anyone have a Formula for a 'better' "Spacing" Number ? There is no magic spacing number based on wavelength. You want them a few inches apart to so the wire to wire capacitance is very small. Spacing them farther apart will not help. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large LOT Of NEW Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew |