Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 02:22 PM
Mike Terry
 
Posts: n/a
Default Digital short-wave

Friday, October 22, 2004

Conference on digitalization predicts "world-wide renaissance of radio"
Text of press release by Deutsche Welle on 21 October

"Digital short-wave will revolutionize cross-border broadcasts and will
initiate a world-wide renaissance of radio." This was the opinion of the
director general of Deutsche Welle, Mr Erik Bettermann, during a panel
discussion at Munchner Medientage. Mr Bettermann, the head of the German
international broadcaster - and instigator of the event - was not the only
one to present an optimistic prediction of a "digital global radio"
development: The other panel specialists also emphasized the advantages of
digitalization in the so-called AM range, i.e. short, medium and long-wave.

The discussion was chaired by Peter Senger, director of distribution at
Deutsche Welle and chairman of the Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) Consortium;
and next to Erik Bettermann, BBC representative Mike Cronk, Dan D'Aversa of
RTL Group and Phil Laven of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) were also
participating in the debate.

(Media Network)


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 02:25 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mike Terry wrote:

Friday, October 22, 2004

Conference on digitalization predicts "world-wide renaissance of radio"
Text of press release by Deutsche Welle on 21 October

"Digital short-wave will revolutionize cross-border broadcasts and will
initiate a world-wide renaissance of radio." This was the opinion of the
director general of Deutsche Welle, Mr Erik Bettermann, during a panel
discussion at Munchner Medientage. Mr Bettermann, the head of the German
international broadcaster - and instigator of the event - was not the only
one to present an optimistic prediction of a "digital global radio"
development: The other panel specialists also emphasized the advantages of
digitalization in the so-called AM range, i.e. short, medium and long-wave.

The discussion was chaired by Peter Senger, director of distribution at
Deutsche Welle and chairman of the Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) Consortium;
and next to Erik Bettermann, BBC representative Mike Cronk, Dan D'Aversa of
RTL Group and Phil Laven of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) were also
participating in the debate.

(Media Network)


DRM = QRM

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 02:43 PM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Mike Terry wrote:

Friday, October 22, 2004

Conference on digitalization predicts "world-wide renaissance of
radio" Text of press release by Deutsche Welle on 21 October

"Digital short-wave will revolutionize cross-border broadcasts and
will initiate a world-wide renaissance of radio." This was the
opinion of the director general of Deutsche Welle, Mr Erik
Bettermann, during a panel discussion at Munchner Medientage. Mr
Bettermann, the head of the German international broadcaster - and
instigator of the event - was not the only one to present an
optimistic prediction of a "digital global radio" development: The
other panel specialists also emphasized the advantages of
digitalization in the so-called AM range, i.e. short, medium and
long-wave.

The discussion was chaired by Peter Senger, director of
distribution at Deutsche Welle and chairman of the Digital Radio
Mondiale (DRM) Consortium; and next to Erik Bettermann, BBC
representative Mike Cronk, Dan D'Aversa of RTL Group and Phil Laven
of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) were also participating in
the debate.

(Media Network)


Basically this amounts to repeat lies and hype often enough and they
become true.

DRM = QRM


Yes but DRM does not offer an overall improvement in reception either.
You are just trading some advantages for other detriments because its a
different system and it costs more money. DRM is not even a wash
compared to analog it a step backward. This a good example of clueless
idiots trying to palm it off as something better.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #4   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 02:50 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Telamon wrote:

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Mike Terry wrote:

Friday, October 22, 2004

Conference on digitalization predicts "world-wide renaissance of
radio" Text of press release by Deutsche Welle on 21 October

"Digital short-wave will revolutionize cross-border broadcasts and
will initiate a world-wide renaissance of radio." This was the
opinion of the director general of Deutsche Welle, Mr Erik
Bettermann, during a panel discussion at Munchner Medientage. Mr
Bettermann, the head of the German international broadcaster - and
instigator of the event - was not the only one to present an
optimistic prediction of a "digital global radio" development: The
other panel specialists also emphasized the advantages of
digitalization in the so-called AM range, i.e. short, medium and
long-wave.

The discussion was chaired by Peter Senger, director of
distribution at Deutsche Welle and chairman of the Digital Radio
Mondiale (DRM) Consortium; and next to Erik Bettermann, BBC
representative Mike Cronk, Dan D'Aversa of RTL Group and Phil Laven
of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) were also participating in
the debate.

(Media Network)


Basically this amounts to repeat lies and hype often enough and they
become true.

DRM = QRM


Yes but DRM does not offer an overall improvement in reception either.
You are just trading some advantages for other detriments because its a
different system and it costs more money. DRM is not even a wash
compared to analog it a step backward. This a good example of clueless
idiots trying to palm it off as something better.


Yeah, everytime I encounter it I simply view it as QRM.

Who, and/or what is the biggest backer of DRM?

And Why?

Is this perhaps something akin to BPL? Are there a few $$ to be made?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 03:03 PM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Mike Terry wrote:

Friday, October 22, 2004

Conference on digitalization predicts "world-wide renaissance of
radio" Text of press release by Deutsche Welle on 21 October

"Digital short-wave will revolutionize cross-border broadcasts and
will initiate a world-wide renaissance of radio." This was the
opinion of the director general of Deutsche Welle, Mr Erik
Bettermann, during a panel discussion at Munchner Medientage. Mr
Bettermann, the head of the German international broadcaster - and
instigator of the event - was not the only one to present an
optimistic prediction of a "digital global radio" development: The
other panel specialists also emphasized the advantages of
digitalization in the so-called AM range, i.e. short, medium and
long-wave.

The discussion was chaired by Peter Senger, director of
distribution at Deutsche Welle and chairman of the Digital Radio
Mondiale (DRM) Consortium; and next to Erik Bettermann, BBC
representative Mike Cronk, Dan D'Aversa of RTL Group and Phil Laven
of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) were also participating in
the debate.

(Media Network)


Basically this amounts to repeat lies and hype often enough and they
become true.

DRM = QRM


Yes but DRM does not offer an overall improvement in reception either.
You are just trading some advantages for other detriments because its a
different system and it costs more money. DRM is not even a wash
compared to analog it a step backward. This a good example of clueless
idiots trying to palm it off as something better.


Yeah, everytime I encounter it I simply view it as QRM.

Who, and/or what is the biggest backer of DRM?


http://www.drm.org/indexdeuz.htm

And Why?

Is this perhaps something akin to BPL? Are there a few $$ to be made?


It's now become a group of broadcasters wetting their pants over saved
electrical transmitting costs. Soon they will con the world into
thinking it's better. It's along the lines of Kerry's plans, hot air BS.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 04, 03:33 PM
hwh
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dxAce" schreef in bericht
...
Yeah, everytime I encounter it I simply view it as QRM.

Who, and/or what is the biggest backer of DRM?

And Why?

Is this perhaps something akin to BPL? Are there a few $$ to be made?


But this would also be valid for IBOC.

gr, hwh


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radio revolution: the DRM way Mike Terry Broadcasting 2 December 13th 04 11:17 PM
Radio Revolution, the DRM way Mike Terry Broadcasting 6 December 2nd 04 06:57 PM
Short wave radio still alive through Hurricane Ivan, yahoo and google agree Tim Skelly Cason Shortwave 1 September 29th 04 12:50 AM
A great short wave pirates group on internet Alfred Zoer \(A*L*I\) Shortwave 0 October 13th 03 07:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017