Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, Anybody here ever try one of these out ? Any good ?
73, Frank |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Halaburak" wrote in message ...
Hi, Anybody here ever try one of these out ? Any good ? 73, Frank Hi Frank, I have the LA350 and it's an excellent antenna, especially if you live in a noisy environment. If you search on "LA350" I'm sure you'll find other posts in the archives. The only drawback to the LA350 is its price. If you buy it along with the optional MW and LW loop elements, you'll probably spend more for it than you would for one of the popular Wellbrook loops. While I've never used a Wellbrook and can't compare it to the LA350, what I read makes me think that it's probably a superior antenna and a better value for the money. It comes in both indoor and outdoor versions. Another advantage of the Wellbrook loops is that they don't require you to adjust any sort of preselector in step with your receiver. The LA350 does require this and you might find it a pain in the behind. There are also loop elements that you have to change from time to time. Steve |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Steve, thanks for the reply. I am familiar with the Wellbrook and have
read a lot of reviews on it, all good ! But I live on a ground floor apartment and I am limited to indoor antennas. "Steve" a écrit dans le message de m... "Frank Halaburak" wrote in message ... Hi, Anybody here ever try one of these out ? Any good ? 73, Frank Hi Frank, I have the LA350 and it's an excellent antenna, especially if you live in a noisy environment. If you search on "LA350" I'm sure you'll find other posts in the archives. The only drawback to the LA350 is its price. If you buy it along with the optional MW and LW loop elements, you'll probably spend more for it than you would for one of the popular Wellbrook loops. While I've never used a Wellbrook and can't compare it to the LA350, what I read makes me think that it's probably a superior antenna and a better value for the money. It comes in both indoor and outdoor versions. Another advantage of the Wellbrook loops is that they don't require you to adjust any sort of preselector in step with your receiver. The LA350 does require this and you might find it a pain in the behind. There are also loop elements that you have to change from time to time. Steve |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Halaburak" wrote in message . ..
Hi Steve, thanks for the reply. I am familiar with the Wellbrook and have read a lot of reviews on it, all good ! But I live on a ground floor apartment and I am limited to indoor antennas. "Steve" a écrit dans le message de m... "Frank Halaburak" wrote in message ... Hi, Anybody here ever try one of these out ? Any good ? 73, Frank Hi Frank, I have the LA350 and it's an excellent antenna, especially if you live in a noisy environment. If you search on "LA350" I'm sure you'll find other posts in the archives. The only drawback to the LA350 is its price. If you buy it along with the optional MW and LW loop elements, you'll probably spend more for it than you would for one of the popular Wellbrook loops. While I've never used a Wellbrook and can't compare it to the LA350, what I read makes me think that it's probably a superior antenna and a better value for the money. It comes in both indoor and outdoor versions. Another advantage of the Wellbrook loops is that they don't require you to adjust any sort of preselector in step with your receiver. The LA350 does require this and you might find it a pain in the behind. There are also loop elements that you have to change from time to time. Steve Well, Wellbrook also makes indoor loops. Perhaps someone can tell you a bit about them? I myself would like to know how they compare to the LA350. Steve |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
it, all good ! But I live on a ground floor apartment and I am limited to
indoor antennas. The Wellbrook performs very well near ground level! From a chap in Belgium - http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/qsl-ala1530.htm The above extensive review should peek your interest. Although I haven't owned this type of loop before I am seriously considering it for my noisy RF environs. I only need to figure out how to get it into and between the attic rafters and mount it on a small rotor. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Tian Li" wrote: it, all good ! But I live on a ground floor apartment and I am limited to indoor antennas. The Wellbrook performs very well near ground level! From a chap in Belgium - http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/qsl-ala1530.htm The above extensive review should peek your interest. Although I haven't owned this type of loop before I am seriously considering it for my noisy RF environs. I only need to figure out how to get it into and between the attic rafters and mount it on a small rotor. Height is not that important to a small loop. It will pick up more long distance signal and even less local noise the higher up it is placed so like most any antenna higher is better. This antenna will work better close to the ground over most types with the exception of an antennas like a Beverage that is designed to work near ground. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought and have been using a Wellbrook ALA330S for the past few weeks.
Andy Ikin, the designer told me that noise pickup is least when mounted at ground level. I have it in the attic now and it has really opened my eyes as too the importance of signal to noise ratio. It does not provide the same high signal levels I get from some other antennas, but it consistently provides the cleanest, clearest signals...it always sounds best, even when signal levels coming out of it are lower than other antennas. It is an excellent antenna and a real "ear opener!" Jay "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Tian Li" wrote: it, all good ! But I live on a ground floor apartment and I am limited to indoor antennas. The Wellbrook performs very well near ground level! From a chap in Belgium - http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/qsl-ala1530.htm The above extensive review should peek your interest. Although I haven't owned this type of loop before I am seriously considering it for my noisy RF environs. I only need to figure out how to get it into and between the attic rafters and mount it on a small rotor. Height is not that important to a small loop. It will pick up more long distance signal and even less local noise the higher up it is placed so like most any antenna higher is better. This antenna will work better close to the ground over most types with the exception of an antennas like a Beverage that is designed to work near ground. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve: I also use the LA 350 in my New York City apartment (Manhattan) -
a worst-case scenario SWL location! Like you, I find it superior to the wires I've tried, which seem to deliver more noise than signal. At times I'm amazed at what the loop captures;. Perhaps it's just propogation over location, but the LA 350 seems to be very happy with my Drake SW8. Cheers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|