Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the best type of transceiver, mobile, handheld, etc. to use for
Amateur Radio Emergency Communications ? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:28:31 -0400, "Jennie"
wrote: What is the best type of transceiver, mobile, handheld, etc. to use for Amateur Radio Emergency Communications ? Thanks Both. You will want one in your vehicle and one in your "go bag" that is fully charged and hopefully has a battery pack that takes "AA" cells of which you will also keep with the radio. Pre-program both units to the frequencies you use in your area and also keep a 'cheat sheet' with same just in case. Also -and this is a BIG also - prior to the emergency you should become a part of the organized response team whether ARES or RACES. If you haven't trained with your peers and the agency(ies) you will be serving your utility as a 'team member' will be little in terms of on-air support. In fact, in regard to RACES if you are not already part of the RACES organization you will not even be acknowledged once RACES Rules are instituted during a disaster and your trying to communicate with them will impair their ability to carry out their mission. However, there are many 'off-air' things that need to be tended to such as rounding up the trained members, handling logistics (emergency responders need water, food, rest accomodations etc). You also need to understand their organizational structure and emergency call-up procedures, this is necessary to be effective for both on-air and off-air support. Not trying to rain on your parade, but emergency comm's is more than just buying a radio and expecting it to be useful during "the big one" (whatever your area's 'big one' may be). Howard |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There really is no "best"..... it all depends on the particular situation
and usage at the time. Generally mobile units have more power, better range and longer lasting power sources (car battery).... but you are tied to a vehicle or must lug a heavy high amp hour battery around...so they are not nearly as mobile. A portable has limited power but this often isn't a factor unless you are far from a repeater. The beauty of a portable is it's ability to pretty much go anywhere. In short you can do things with a mobile you can't acccomplish as surely with a portable.... but under certain circumstances the reverse is also true. I'd have both. Mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Melland wrote:
In short you can do things with a mobile you can't acccomplish as surely with a portable.... but under certain circumstances the reverse is also true. I'd have both. Working "on a budget", I found it acceptable to use a portable and have a linear amp and 5/8-wave antenna on the car. -- Consider http://www.clifto.com/goodguys.html before you vote. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |