"Diverd4777" wrote in message
...
** JuLiE Dxer:
**
** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
** What kind of receivers do you have?
** What kind of Antennas?
** How's Propagation in your neck of the woods ??
** Any interesting catches recently?
** Write any Utilities for receivers ?
**
** JuLiE Dxer:
** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
** Put up or Shut up, and have a nice day.
**
* Is there some odd reason why you are concerned with "JuLIE" and not
* with the other id that's engaged in massive OT bombardment of rrs
* with no shortwave content? Just wonderin'


Exactly... There are way too many off topic postings cluttering up
this group with pure garbage not related to short wave radio. One
reason why they're not channeling their efforts towards the spammers
is that they're part of the group of spammers with all their Identity
shifting.

"JuLiE Dxer" wrote in message
...


"Diverd4777" wrote in message
...
** JuLiE Dxer:
**
** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
** What kind of receivers do you have?
** What kind of Antennas?
** How's Propagation in your neck of the woods ??
** Any interesting catches recently?
** Write any Utilities for receivers ?
**
** JuLiE Dxer:
** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
** Put up or Shut up, and have a nice day.
**
* Is there some odd reason why you are concerned with "JuLIE" and not
* with the other id that's engaged in massive OT bombardment of rrs
* with no shortwave content? Just wonderin'


Exactly... There are way too many off topic postings cluttering up
this group with pure garbage not related to short wave radio. One
reason why they're not channeling their efforts towards the spammers
is that they're part of the group of spammers with all their Identity
shifting.

No you shut up!

-=jd=- schrieb:

.....Will it include the content of broadcasts
heard on the radio?

The contetnt is sometimes useful for IDing a station for some reason.
But _discussing_ on the content is clearly offtopic here. Thanks.

"Brian Edward Hill" wrote in message
...
|
| "JuLiE Dxer" wrote in message
| ...
|
|
| "Diverd4777" wrote in message
| ...
| ** JuLiE Dxer:
| **
| ** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
| ** What kind of receivers do you have?
| ** What kind of Antennas?
| ** How's Propagation in your neck of the woods ??
| ** Any interesting catches recently?
| ** Write any Utilities for receivers ?
| **
| ** JuLiE Dxer:
| ** - Do you post anything about Shortwave?
| ** Put up or Shut up, and have a nice day.
| **
| * Is there some odd reason why you are concerned with "JuLIE" and not
| * with the other id that's engaged in massive OT bombardment of rrs
| * with no shortwave content? Just wonderin'
|
|
| Exactly... There are way too many off topic postings cluttering up
| this group with pure garbage not related to short wave radio. One
| reason why they're not channeling their efforts towards the spammers
| is that they're part of the group of spammers with all their Identity
| shifting.
|
| No you shut up!

Time has come for us to shut *her* up.

Send your complaints to:
if you've had enough of her garbage.

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
| On Sat 06 Nov 2004 12:00:20p, Dan wrote
| in message :
|
| On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 17:51:50 +0100, Volker Tonn
| wrote:
|
|
| -=jd=- schrieb:
|
| .....Will it include the content of broadcasts
| heard on the radio?
|
| The contetnt is sometimes useful for IDing a station for
| some reason. But _discussing_ on the content is clearly
| offtopic here. Thanks.
|
| In your opinion. Thanks.
|
| Dan
|
|
| Here's a snip from a 1996 post pointing to the charter & faq:
| http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/monitoring/introduction/
| (my emphasis added in all-caps)
| ###################
| What is rec.radio.shortwave for?
|
| ...This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio
| monitoring topic can and should be discussed. We are happy to
| hear from posters who listen to any part of the radio or
| microwave spectrum, from DC to daylight. We discuss topics of
| ALMOST ANY KIND, ranging from (but not limited to) SHORTWAVE
| BROADCASTING, DXing small or distant shortwave stations,
| utility and teletype monitoring, military eavesdropping,
| station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters, spectrum
| usage, equipment design and modifications, antennas, receiver
| reviews and recommendations, AND MANY MORE...
| ###################
|
| So, when it gets to the part about topics, what is the *very*
| first item in the example list?:
|
| "...We discuss topics of almost any kind, ranging from (but
| not limited to) shortwave broadcasting..."
|
| And there you have it.
|
| Julie (if that's your *real* name), Mike Terry, Volker Tonn -
| You are all hereby relieved of your net-kopping duties. You
| may lay down your arms & return peacfully to your farms and
| fields; You fought bravely and honorably, but now the war has
| ended.

Honorably? By making reference to where I live and the names
of members of my family? By posting one of my email addresses
multiple times to encourage spam? She doesn't understand honor,
and for that reason, I think it's time to encourage Verizon to take
away her posting privileges. "She" is a control freak, and will stop
at nothing to shut people up.

It's time to fight fire with fire. "She" is in way over her head.

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04

-=jd=- schrieb:



The group name is "Rec.Radio.Shortwave", not
"Rec.Radio.Shortwave.Technical-Aspects-Only"...


There are are plenty of groups specialized to talk on political and
other topics. If you want political, geographical or sexual talk go to
the related group(s)!
Newsgroups are related on themes. And rrs is related on _receiving_ not
on _contetnt_ of transmissions. Period.
It's fine to point out what you're actually hearing on shortwave or
other freqs. But if you want to discuss on non receiving related content
make a follow-up to the related group. Thanks.

-=jd=- schrieb:


Please refer to the previous post of mine with reference to
the newsgroup charter for a clearer understanding that
broadcast content is on topic. Thanks much!

A newsgroup with a special topic is to prefer over any other usegroup it
may be a "special part" of.
With other words: Any topic a special newsgroup exists for, is offtopic
everywhere(!) else. This is how newsgroups _basically_ work. Take it.

On 06 Nov 2004 19:42:04 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

On Sat 06 Nov 2004 02:27:54p, Volker Tonn
wrote in message
:



-=jd=- schrieb:



The group name is "Rec.Radio.Shortwave", not
"Rec.Radio.Shortwave.Technical-Aspects-Only"...


There are are plenty of groups specialized to talk on
political and other topics. If you want political,
geographical or sexual talk go to the related group(s)!
Newsgroups are related on themes. And rrs is related on
_receiving_ not on _contetnt_ of transmissions. Period.
It's fine to point out what you're actually hearing on
shortwave or other freqs. But if you want to discuss on non
receiving related content make a follow-up to the related
group. Thanks.


Please refer to the previous post of mine with reference to
the newsgroup charter for a clearer understanding that
broadcast content is on topic. Thanks much!

-=jd=-

Exactly. It's my pleasure to "cross the aisle" and to agree with an
excellent example of a thinking conservative on this issue of content.

Otherwise, this interesting and challenging list could devolve into a
bunch of ******s discussing their rigs.

The self-appointed Wouff-Hongs, like JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome,
are free to ignore the posts that do not meet their needs.

And, oh yeah, keep listening, and 73,

BB

"-=jd=-" wrote:

| I can empathise with your sentiments & it indicates why my
| humor and sarcasm may not have registered...
|
| -=jd=-

(chuckling)

Not a problem, jd. I just had a bit of an epiphany. JuLIE
is a child, or has the mentality of a child, and has no sense of
control over her/his/its environment. Upon re - reading the
aforementioned post, I see just what you're saying.

Too, I notice JuLIE isn't posting here - could her/his/its
verizon.net account have been suspended for TOS violations?

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/04

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
ink.net...

Not a problem, jd. I just had a bit of an epiphany. JuLIE
is a child, or has the mentality of a child, and has no sense of
control over her/his/its environment. Upon re - reading the
aforementioned post, I see just what you're saying.

Too, I notice JuLIE isn't posting here - could her/his/its
verizon.net account have been suspended for TOS violations?


I have assumed she was about 12 all along, I just now realized that she
could be older (hopefully not)