Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lars Janqqvist" wrote in message ... Frightening the yaks, -=jd=- just had to say: It wasn't nearly as difficult as I had anticipated. I finished up with 14 rotors and 15 stators. The meter says 7pF with the plates unmeshed, and 314pF with the plates fully meshed. The trickiest part was patiently (and subtly) straightening the plates after assembly. Cumulative time spent building it was probably 4 hours. After building the first one, you realize that the plates don't have to be perfectly cut - they just have to rotate all the way around without contacting anything. Just as the Cajuns know that "looks don't make it taste good", capacitor plates that aren't cut exquisitely neat don't mean it won't... um... "capacitate"... -=jd=- re uneven plates: The linearity will suffer but unless you're calibrating it to something (tuning dial, antenna load) that shouldn't matter. I don't see anything linear in F vs C for a resonant circuit. In fact, in order to make it anywhere close to linear, one has to go to extremes with the shape of the plates. Dale W4OP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale Parfitt wrote:
I don't see anything linear in F vs C for a resonant circuit. In fact, in order to make it anywhere close to linear, one has to go to extremes with the shape of the plates. That's most likely why they resemble the profile of a snail's shell...a logarithmic spiral of sorts. mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frightening the yaks, Dale Parfitt just had to say:
re uneven plates: The linearity will suffer but unless you're calibrating it to something (tuning dial, antenna load) that shouldn't matter. I don't see anything linear in F vs C for a resonant circuit. In fact, in order to make it anywhere close to linear, one has to go to extremes with the shape of the plates. My bad. Not linear in the sense of d-pF/d-theta = K. But more the idea of no sharp changes for slight adjustment of the rotors. Continuously differentiable, I should have said. But if a linear variable cap *was* desired, the plates shouldn't be all that hard to fabricate. -- To reply, DO NOT remove spam from the return address! *************************** This calls for a careful blend of clever psychology and extreme violence. *************************** |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lars Janqqvist" wrote in message ... Frightening the yaks, Dale Parfitt just had to say: re uneven plates: The linearity will suffer but unless you're calibrating it to something (tuning dial, antenna load) that shouldn't matter. I don't see anything linear in F vs C for a resonant circuit. In fact, in order to make it anywhere close to linear, one has to go to extremes with the shape of the plates. My bad. Not linear in the sense of d-pF/d-theta = K. But more the idea of no sharp changes for slight adjustment of the rotors. Continuously differentiable, I should have said. But if a linear variable cap *was* desired, the plates shouldn't be all that hard to fabricate. You are correct Lars. I seem to recall this in some early tube sets. I was able to make the VFO in a hi end homebrew RX I am building quite linear by making certain the variable cap comprises a relatively small portion of the total tank C- and this using the typical 1/2 round plates. All sorts of games can be played by using combinations of series and parallel capacities along with the variable. An Excel spreadsheet gives quick insight. Also nice to see a bit of differential calculus on the group! Dale W4OP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 11 Nov 2004 02:43:51a, Lars Janqqvist wrote in message : Frightening the yaks, Dale Parfitt just had to say: re uneven plates: The linearity will suffer but unless you're calibrating it to something (tuning dial, antenna load) that shouldn't matter. I don't see anything linear in F vs C for a resonant circuit. In fact, in order to make it anywhere close to linear, one has to go to extremes with the shape of the plates. My bad. Not linear in the sense of d-pF/d-theta = K. But more the idea of no sharp changes for slight adjustment of the rotors. Continuously differentiable, I should have said. But if a linear variable cap *was* desired, the plates shouldn't be all that hard to fabricate. Aluminum roof flashing - it cuts easily with scissors. True, it's fragile outside of the capacitor, but once it's in there, it should be fine. This first set, I cut with painstaking care. The rotors have a 3" radius and the stators are just rectangular. I'm thinking of making a larger one (more plates). I'm only planning to use it in a receive only antenna project. Now, I'm not sure how "perfect" it needs to be; but it it's like any other SWL antenna projects, they have been *extremely* tolerant of non-precision... Thank goodness... Also don't forget variable coaxial style capacitors- although large values can be a pain, this can be an easy to build approach. Dale W4OP |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FT270R Yaesu FV101-Z Cardwell Air Variable Capacitor | Dx | |||
FA: Yaesu FT270R Yaesu FV101-Z Cardwell Air Variable Capacitor | Equipment | |||
FA: Yaesu FT270R Yaesu FV101-Z Cardwell Air Variable Capacitor | Homebrew | |||
Looking for variable capacitor... | Homebrew | |||
Looking for variable capacitor... | Homebrew |