Brian Hill wrote:

I also have my doubts.

I'll become his very best friend in the whole world as soon as he
apologizes to Michael Bryant for stalking him at his workplace. Life
will be much nicer then.





mike

m II wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

I also have my doubts.

I'll become his very best friend in the whole world as soon as he
apologizes to Michael Bryant for stalking him at his workplace. Life
will be much nicer then.

Never stalked him at all, 'tard boy.

I invite you to prove that I did.

Put up, or shut up, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"m II" wrote in message
news:i14od.10841$l65.1604@clgrps13...
Brian Hill wrote:

I also have my doubts.

I'll become his very best friend in the whole world as soon as he
apologizes to Michael Bryant for stalking him at his workplace. Life
will be much nicer then.





mike

Actually Bryant was quite aggressive himself. He incites religious and
political riots then cries when people give it back to him just like he
dishes it out. You can't go putting yourself above people you disagree with
then make up lies to back yourself up. Go google his handles and read his
crap. Bryant was caught red handed. Steve may call names and is hard at
times but I've never caught him using a lie to gain leverage.


--
73 and good DXing.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire!
Zumbrota, Southern MN
Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/

EMAIL-
(Hide the $100 to reply!)

"m II" wrote in message
news:GK3od.175295$df2.137970@edtnps89...
Brian Hill wrote:

"JuLiE Dxer"



Your Stupid! You just insulted one of the few nice people that comes
here.
Your one of the few truly mean people I've seen around here. You should
try
to get rid of that f--kin rain cloud and let a little sunshine in. Gee
wiz!

Many confused people exhibit the same behavior. Their own lives are so
shallow that they find it impossible to imagine a better way of living
or thinking. Bitterness against everyone is just one symptom of deep
inner troubles. Now, why this entity should be using a female's name
is beyond me. That is another matter, I'm sure.





mike

Yes I agree and I doubt the female sig as well. I think it's a true troll.
The cunning type that convinces you but has a different agenda altogether.


--
73 and good DXing.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire!
Zumbrota, Southern MN
Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/

EMAIL-
(Hide the $100 to reply!)

B.H.

mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges wrote:

In article ,
JuLiE Dxer wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:28:53 GMT, Heather Davison
wrote:

whoever put up that websight shold be tryed for treason. that is giving
aid and comfort to the enemy. it is treason.


You will notice that most posters to the shortwave newsgroups are
anti-American including the traitors residing within the Earth's
greatest nation's own borders.

Interesting. So now trying to get a different point of view on current
events than the one officially approved by the Bush administration is
treason? I figure it was only a matter of time. Silly me, I thought I
lived in America not North Korea. I wonder when all radios will come
with just a handful of preapproved presets, and TVs will broadcast only
Fox News.

is the web site the truth or not?

Anybody can claim anything on the internet-and apparently have it
accepted as truth.

arf meow arf

cthulu loves you
he loves the little children
with ketchup please



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Ross wrote:

mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges pulled a bright
blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
:

In article ,
"-=jd=-" wrote:

On Sat 20 Nov 2004 09:45:44a, mariposas morgan mair fheal
greykitten tomys des anges wrote in
message
:

In article
,
Heather Davison wrote:

whoever put up that websight shold be tryed for treason.
that is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. it is
treason.

is it the truth?


I don't know about treason, but it *certainly* not the whole
truth, which is arguably just as bad or worse. Where are the

so are you saying we should outlaw any presentation which is only
partially true?

Let's see....

That would put CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox News, CNN, BBC, CBC all off the air.

I guess we would have to rely on Al Jazeera for our news.

Because Al Jazeera is totally false as opposed to only partially false?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

P L O N K !

define -credible source-



One that presents the whole truth that is openly available at

is pbs a credible source?
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t224_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t344_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t347_full.html

the time. (Hope you don't mind my re-adding the parts of my post

get a newsreader that can followe the references line

what would you call treason? in law?


I have not asserted anything is treason. Why do you ask?

then perhaps you should not rush to heathers defense

,
Heather Davison
wrote:

whoever put up that websight shold be tryed for
treason. that is giving aid and comfort to the
enemy. it is treason.

so how do you feel about the truths of powell and cheney
and rumsfield and rice and shrub?

I've already made that clear. Do you think you can recall it

so you accept anything an authority fiugure claims as the truth
or just republican authority figures?
does bbc or pbs or any other news service that shows their lies
mean they are not a credible source?

Nope, I don't have any problem with you and your soul-mate
Dan Blather spreading partial truths. I *DO* have a problem
when you cop an attitude after I expose you for the
propagandist you are. Rant all you want - we'll reserve the
right to continue to (appropriately) reject your invalid
point of view.

Oh, and be sure to snip out the parts of my post that you
simply can't deal with...

and what propaganda is that?


I've already made that clear as well. Do you think you can

when you cop an attitude after I expose you for the
propagandist you are. Rant all you want - we'll reserve the

and what propaganda are you accusing me of?

you were incapable of addressing) In any event, it is painfully
clear that you are wholly incapable of defending your blatatly
invalid point of view - you know, the invalid liberal/leftist
point of view that was resoundingly rejected by the majority of
voters in the most recent election - without lamely resorting to
redundant and insipid questions. Perhaps you should google-up
some debating skills that will allow you to respond to a post
without being forced to snip out the parts that stymie you. Taa-

gosh thats a devastating conclusion
now announce plonk
and ran away secure in your prejudices

arf meow arf

cthulu loves you
he loves the little children
with ketchup please

In article ,
"-=jd=-" wrote:

On Mon 22 Nov 2004 10:15:05p, mariposas morgan mair fheal
greykitten tomys des anges wrote in
message
:

define -credible source-



One that presents the whole truth that is openly available
at

is pbs a credible source?
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t224_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t344_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t347_full.html



Do any of those links show that anyone knowingly and willfully
lied? No.

oh lordy

arf meow arf

cthulu loves you
he loves the little children
with ketchup please