Terrorist is an imprecise term. There is a tactic called Asymmetric
Warfare where an outmuscled adversary uses ''hit and run'' techniques
that frequently involve civilian targets. There is absolutely no
moral difference between that and bombing civilians with
intercontinental bombers or cruise missiles.

All prisoners should be protected. Including Americans.

On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:09:25 -0600, wrote:

Geneva Convention thingy says terrorist have NO! rights.I Agree with
that too.

.......D-Day Larry

David wrote:

Terrorist is an imprecise term. There is a tactic called Asymmetric
Warfare where an outmuscled adversary uses ''hit and run'' techniques
that frequently involve civilian targets. There is absolutely no
moral difference between that and bombing civilians with
intercontinental bombers or cruise missiles.

All prisoners should be protected. Including Americans.

Thanks for including the Americans in there as sort of an afterthought, 'tard
boy.

It's true! You do indeed wake up just plain stupid on a daily basis.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:09:25 -0600, wrote:

Geneva Convention thingy says terrorist have NO! rights.I Agree with
that too.

.......D-Day Larry

beerbarrel wrote:

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:51:45 GMT, David wrote:

Terrorist is an imprecise term. There is a tactic called Asymmetric
Warfare where an outmuscled adversary uses ''hit and run'' techniques
that frequently involve civilian targets. There is absolutely no
moral difference between that and bombing civilians with
intercontinental bombers or cruise missiles.

All prisoners should be protected. Including Americans.

On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:09:25 -0600, wrote:

Geneva Convention thingy says terrorist have NO! rights.I Agree with
that too.

.......D-Day Larry

I'd like to protect one....with a basaball bat!

I'm saving my baseball bat and axe handle for those riots that 'tard boy Rickets
was alluding too in '06.

dxAce
Michigan
USA