m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

dxAce
Michigan
USA



I caught your last video. Good voice, if a bit effeminate. How'd you get
beerbrain to dress up like a woman? Didn't take too long to convince him,
I'd imagine

http://snipurl.com/byqt

You don't have brains enough to imagine anything at all, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

RHF wrote:
MII,

This Link/URL Says That You Are A : spammer, Spammer. SPAMMER !
.
Hello. You are seeing this Message
because you clicked a "snipped URL" (?)
which we believe may be SPAM.
.
We did not send you this URL, one of the users of our website did.
Please read our FAQ if you are interested in learning more.
If you click yes below to continue, you will be taken to this URL:
http://www.smilep*p.c*m/index.cfm?ac...p age_id=6667
.
Snipped on: 2005-01-12 21:34:32
.
Do you wish to continue? NO ! ~ RHF
.
.


Click on 'continue, It's safe and just stupid enough to pass on...


OR:
http://www.smilepop.com/index.cfm?ac...p age_id=6667

Here is the direct link. It works if you aren't cursed by the Microsoft
'wrapped URL' sickness.

MII - You Keep Promoting This SPAM In The Can . . .
Hey, It Just May Be CanaDuhian Bacon ;-} ~ RHF

Steve,

A lot of people do quite well in life without having a perfect command
of their native language.

Look at George W. Shrub...? He is one of the most inarticulate people
I have ever seen in high public life. Yet you all voted fro him TWICE!
Why?

The truth is that I didn't ever one time all the way through school
and the university receive an "A" in English"

I usually received "C's" and "D's" in grammar. I took two years of
French and two years of Italian in high school and at the university.
I made "A"'s and "B's" in both of them.

As I said earlier I had a 98% in General Chemistry. I made "A's" in
most of my advance math and science course also. I also made "B's" in
my logic classes.

I'm not sure what it was about English that made it so hard for me to
speak on an excellent level.

I even made "A's" in spelling. I won a spelling bee on television in
grade school.


Just the same there is no need for you to show the world what a low
level of logic you have by trying to belittle the messenger instead of
logically debating his message. :-)

That's a very common thing that people do online and it immediately
reveals that although they may speak grammar well, they do not know
how to reason properly.

In other words they are usually nattering nabobs of negativism!

So mote it be


On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:09:29 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
wrote:


"Knowledge" wrote:

| That is the most unhealthiest position to take mentally.

Should read "most unhealthy."

Now...a question: Did you get straight A grades in English?

Thanks,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous

Knowledge wrote:

Steve,

A lot of people do quite well in life without having a perfect command
of their native language.

Look at George W. Shrub...? He is one of the most inarticulate people
I have ever seen in high public life. Yet you all voted fro him TWICE!
Why?

Because he's obviously smarter than you think you are?

Something to think about.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

No Steven,

I'm saying that different crimes should have different punishments
because some are more heinous than others.

What CBS did regardless of whether they were Republican Reporters, or
Democrat reporters is nothing at all compared to the death and
destruction that have been caused by GWB's massive lying and trickery.

My goodness! Even Jose Feliciano can see that.

Isn't that the way it works in your country?

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:08:29 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
wrote:


"Knowledge" wrote:

| No one died in the CBS episode. someone made some mistakes in
| researching information.

So you're saying that death is a prerequisite for considering any topic
meaningful?

Strange criterion, methinks.

73,

Knowledge wrote:

No Steven,

I'm saying that different crimes should have different punishments
because some are more heinous than others.

What CBS did regardless of whether they were Republican Reporters, or
Democrat reporters is nothing at all compared to the death and
destruction that have been caused by GWB's massive lying and trickery.

So you are saying that Dan Rather was not somehow involved in lying and/or
trickery?

You need to wise up, boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

KNOWLEDGE,
..
What 'you' Believe To Be True {The TRUTH} .
..
May NOT Be Readily Apparent To All {Most People} .
..
Remember the in the Middle of Be-Lie-ve is a "Lie" [.]
..
something to think about and reflect on ~ RHF

KNOWLEDGE,
..
If you were all that smart . . . duh, Duh. DUH !
You would not have to attempt to brag about it.
..
Well may be if you were 14 years old and graduated
from Stanford University with a Degree in Advanced
Mathematics in the 1960s. )
..
Or your name was Dr. euGene Scott ;-}
..
Then you would simply sign your posts with a :
* PHD / Doctoral Candidate at _______________
* MD / JD / PDH
* Esquire / Esq.
* CPA / CFP what ever
..
As for me, I have no claim to Fame or Honors and remain simply . . .
..
Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature by Living ~ RHF
[ Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch ]
..

In article .com,
"RHF" wrote:

KNOWLEDGE,
.
If you were all that smart . . . duh, Duh. DUH !
You would not have to attempt to brag about it.
.
Well may be if you were 14 years old and graduated
from Stanford University with a Degree in Advanced
Mathematics in the 1960s. )
.
Or your name was Dr. euGene Scott ;-}
.
Then you would simply sign your posts with a :
* PHD / Doctoral Candidate at _______________
* MD / JD / PDH
* Esquire / Esq.
* CPA / CFP what ever
.
As for me, I have no claim to Fame or Honors and remain simply . . .

Scott is a case in point that advanced academic degrees are no guarantee
that you have your feet on the ground and just look at what he's done
with that fine education.

Now get on the phone and give him all your money.

Dr. Telamon, Ph. D. in the psychology of Usenet news.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California